Communication barriers in therapist – patient – caregiver relationship
The success or failure of a therapeutic approach, medical or psychological, are influenced by many factors. Among them we can mention the patient’s insufficient knowledge about the disease, preconceptions of patient or caregiver’s fear of stigmatization, the issue regarding duration and side effe...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Publishing House
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Romanian Journal of Military Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revistamedicinamilitara.ro/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2014-34-full.52-57.pdf |
Summary: | The success or failure of a therapeutic approach, medical or psychological, are influenced
by many factors. Among them we can mention the patient’s insufficient knowledge about the
disease, preconceptions of patient or caregiver’s fear of stigmatization, the issue regarding
duration and side effects of treatment, cost of medicines and so on. Last but not least, the
therapist’s ability to communicate accordingly to the beneficiaries’ comprehension and barriers
encountered in the communication between actors directly involved in the therapeutic process
(patient caregiver, psychologist, and doctor) can change the opportunity to obtain a suitable
therapeutic benefit yet from beginning.
Materials and methods: In order to assess the concordance between the messages sent by doctors
and how they are received by patients and caregivers, we have applied a different questionnaire
for the three categories of respondents mentioned above. These three distinct sets of questions
were completed during 100 psychiatric consultations, in ambulatory regimen.
Results: Comparative analysis of the questionnaire results has shown major differences between
the information that doctors thought they had sent and what was actually received by patients
and caregivers. Paradoxically, the more medical explanations were elaborated and detailed, the
less volume of adequate information was taken home by beneficiaries.
Conclusions: It is necessary for each of us to have a self-assessment of how we communicate with
patients and which is the real benefit that we offer through our words. It is also mandatory to
adapt the „language of medicine” to the common people understanding abilities (without medical
training).
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1222-5126 2501-2312 |