Impact and Outcomes of Pretreatment Total Serum Testosterone on Localized Prostate Cancer Patients

Purpose. To investigate how pretreatment testosterone levels correlate with progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival in a propensity-adjusted localized prostate cancer population. Methods. Men diagnosed with clinical NCCN-risk stratified very-low, low, intermediate,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brittni M. Usera, Polly Creveling, Jonathan D. Tward
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:Prostate Cancer
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8357452
id doaj-f99f897f963444639fdb8904e2d4fa60
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f99f897f963444639fdb8904e2d4fa602020-11-25T02:00:20ZengHindawi LimitedProstate Cancer2090-31112090-312X2020-01-01202010.1155/2020/83574528357452Impact and Outcomes of Pretreatment Total Serum Testosterone on Localized Prostate Cancer PatientsBrittni M. Usera0Polly Creveling1Jonathan D. Tward2Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USACancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USAPurpose. To investigate how pretreatment testosterone levels correlate with progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival in a propensity-adjusted localized prostate cancer population. Methods. Men diagnosed with clinical NCCN-risk stratified very-low, low, intermediate, high, and/or very-high risk prostate cancer who had a baseline total serum testosterone level≥100 ng/dl measured within the 100 days preceding the first definitive therapy were identified from our prospectively gathered institutional database. Cohorts below (100–239 ng/dl), within (240–593 ng/dl), or above (594 + ng/dl) one standard deviation from the mean testosterone level (416 ng/dl) were used for comparison. Progression-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival were evaluated. A separate cohort of men not receiving ADT was used to evaluate testosterone recovery after various treatment modalities (surgery, external beam radiation, brachytherapy, or combined EBRT + Brachy). Results. There was no statistically significant difference between the low, average, and high testosterone cohorts for PFS, MFS, or OS. In men not using ADT, there were no statistically significant changes in testosterone levels 1 year after therapy, regardless of therapy type. Conclusion. In men with serum testosterone levels >=100 ng/dl at diagnosis, baseline testosterone does not impact PFS, MFS, or OS. Recovery of testosterone back to baseline is expected for men undergoing either surgery, external beam or brachytherapy, or combined modality radiation when not using ADT.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8357452
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brittni M. Usera
Polly Creveling
Jonathan D. Tward
spellingShingle Brittni M. Usera
Polly Creveling
Jonathan D. Tward
Impact and Outcomes of Pretreatment Total Serum Testosterone on Localized Prostate Cancer Patients
Prostate Cancer
author_facet Brittni M. Usera
Polly Creveling
Jonathan D. Tward
author_sort Brittni M. Usera
title Impact and Outcomes of Pretreatment Total Serum Testosterone on Localized Prostate Cancer Patients
title_short Impact and Outcomes of Pretreatment Total Serum Testosterone on Localized Prostate Cancer Patients
title_full Impact and Outcomes of Pretreatment Total Serum Testosterone on Localized Prostate Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Impact and Outcomes of Pretreatment Total Serum Testosterone on Localized Prostate Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Impact and Outcomes of Pretreatment Total Serum Testosterone on Localized Prostate Cancer Patients
title_sort impact and outcomes of pretreatment total serum testosterone on localized prostate cancer patients
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Prostate Cancer
issn 2090-3111
2090-312X
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Purpose. To investigate how pretreatment testosterone levels correlate with progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival in a propensity-adjusted localized prostate cancer population. Methods. Men diagnosed with clinical NCCN-risk stratified very-low, low, intermediate, high, and/or very-high risk prostate cancer who had a baseline total serum testosterone level≥100 ng/dl measured within the 100 days preceding the first definitive therapy were identified from our prospectively gathered institutional database. Cohorts below (100–239 ng/dl), within (240–593 ng/dl), or above (594 + ng/dl) one standard deviation from the mean testosterone level (416 ng/dl) were used for comparison. Progression-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival were evaluated. A separate cohort of men not receiving ADT was used to evaluate testosterone recovery after various treatment modalities (surgery, external beam radiation, brachytherapy, or combined EBRT + Brachy). Results. There was no statistically significant difference between the low, average, and high testosterone cohorts for PFS, MFS, or OS. In men not using ADT, there were no statistically significant changes in testosterone levels 1 year after therapy, regardless of therapy type. Conclusion. In men with serum testosterone levels >=100 ng/dl at diagnosis, baseline testosterone does not impact PFS, MFS, or OS. Recovery of testosterone back to baseline is expected for men undergoing either surgery, external beam or brachytherapy, or combined modality radiation when not using ADT.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8357452
work_keys_str_mv AT brittnimusera impactandoutcomesofpretreatmenttotalserumtestosteroneonlocalizedprostatecancerpatients
AT pollycreveling impactandoutcomesofpretreatmenttotalserumtestosteroneonlocalizedprostatecancerpatients
AT jonathandtward impactandoutcomesofpretreatmenttotalserumtestosteroneonlocalizedprostatecancerpatients
_version_ 1715602757430280192