Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG
Magneto-/Electro-encephalography (M/EEG) commonly uses (fast) Fourier transformation to compute power spectral density (PSD). However, the resulting PSD plot lacks temporal information, making interpretation sometimes equivocal. For example, consider two different PSDs: a central parietal EEG PSD wi...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/24/7040 |
id |
doaj-f99ecebeb6634d6cb3ff834c41388f74 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f99ecebeb6634d6cb3ff834c41388f742020-12-10T00:00:58ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-12-01207040704010.3390/s20247040Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEGNattapong Thammasan0Makoto Miyakoshi1Human Media Interaction, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The NetherlandsSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USAMagneto-/Electro-encephalography (M/EEG) commonly uses (fast) Fourier transformation to compute power spectral density (PSD). However, the resulting PSD plot lacks temporal information, making interpretation sometimes equivocal. For example, consider two different PSDs: a central parietal EEG PSD with twin peaks at 10 Hz and 20 Hz and a central parietal PSD with twin peaks at 10 Hz and 50 Hz. We can assume the first PSD shows a mu rhythm and the second harmonic; however, the latter PSD likely shows an alpha peak and an independent line noise. Without prior knowledge, however, the PSD alone cannot distinguish between the two cases. To address this limitation of PSD, we propose using <i>cross-frequency power–power coupling</i> (PPC) as a post-processing of independent component (IC) analysis (ICA) to distinguish brain components from muscle and environmental artifact sources. We conclude that post-ICA PPC analysis could serve as a new data-driven EEG classifier in M/EEG studies. For the reader’s convenience, we offer a brief literature overview on the disparate use of PPC. The proposed cross-frequency <i>power–power coupling analysis toolbox</i> (PowPowCAT) is a free, open-source toolbox, which works as an EEGLAB extension.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/24/7040EEGMEGfourier transformcross-frequency couplingcomodulogramcomodugram |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nattapong Thammasan Makoto Miyakoshi |
spellingShingle |
Nattapong Thammasan Makoto Miyakoshi Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG Sensors EEG MEG fourier transform cross-frequency coupling comodulogram comodugram |
author_facet |
Nattapong Thammasan Makoto Miyakoshi |
author_sort |
Nattapong Thammasan |
title |
Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG |
title_short |
Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG |
title_full |
Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG |
title_fullStr |
Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG |
title_sort |
cross-frequency power-power coupling analysis: a useful cross-frequency measure to classify ica-decomposed eeg |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sensors |
issn |
1424-8220 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Magneto-/Electro-encephalography (M/EEG) commonly uses (fast) Fourier transformation to compute power spectral density (PSD). However, the resulting PSD plot lacks temporal information, making interpretation sometimes equivocal. For example, consider two different PSDs: a central parietal EEG PSD with twin peaks at 10 Hz and 20 Hz and a central parietal PSD with twin peaks at 10 Hz and 50 Hz. We can assume the first PSD shows a mu rhythm and the second harmonic; however, the latter PSD likely shows an alpha peak and an independent line noise. Without prior knowledge, however, the PSD alone cannot distinguish between the two cases. To address this limitation of PSD, we propose using <i>cross-frequency power–power coupling</i> (PPC) as a post-processing of independent component (IC) analysis (ICA) to distinguish brain components from muscle and environmental artifact sources. We conclude that post-ICA PPC analysis could serve as a new data-driven EEG classifier in M/EEG studies. For the reader’s convenience, we offer a brief literature overview on the disparate use of PPC. The proposed cross-frequency <i>power–power coupling analysis toolbox</i> (PowPowCAT) is a free, open-source toolbox, which works as an EEGLAB extension. |
topic |
EEG MEG fourier transform cross-frequency coupling comodulogram comodugram |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/24/7040 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nattapongthammasan crossfrequencypowerpowercouplinganalysisausefulcrossfrequencymeasuretoclassifyicadecomposedeeg AT makotomiyakoshi crossfrequencypowerpowercouplinganalysisausefulcrossfrequencymeasuretoclassifyicadecomposedeeg |
_version_ |
1724387921865211904 |