Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG

Magneto-/Electro-encephalography (M/EEG) commonly uses (fast) Fourier transformation to compute power spectral density (PSD). However, the resulting PSD plot lacks temporal information, making interpretation sometimes equivocal. For example, consider two different PSDs: a central parietal EEG PSD wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nattapong Thammasan, Makoto Miyakoshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
EEG
MEG
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/24/7040
id doaj-f99ecebeb6634d6cb3ff834c41388f74
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f99ecebeb6634d6cb3ff834c41388f742020-12-10T00:00:58ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-12-01207040704010.3390/s20247040Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEGNattapong Thammasan0Makoto Miyakoshi1Human Media Interaction, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The NetherlandsSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USAMagneto-/Electro-encephalography (M/EEG) commonly uses (fast) Fourier transformation to compute power spectral density (PSD). However, the resulting PSD plot lacks temporal information, making interpretation sometimes equivocal. For example, consider two different PSDs: a central parietal EEG PSD with twin peaks at 10 Hz and 20 Hz and a central parietal PSD with twin peaks at 10 Hz and 50 Hz. We can assume the first PSD shows a mu rhythm and the second harmonic; however, the latter PSD likely shows an alpha peak and an independent line noise. Without prior knowledge, however, the PSD alone cannot distinguish between the two cases. To address this limitation of PSD, we propose using <i>cross-frequency power–power coupling</i> (PPC) as a post-processing of independent component (IC) analysis (ICA) to distinguish brain components from muscle and environmental artifact sources. We conclude that post-ICA PPC analysis could serve as a new data-driven EEG classifier in M/EEG studies. For the reader’s convenience, we offer a brief literature overview on the disparate use of PPC. The proposed cross-frequency <i>power–power coupling analysis toolbox</i> (PowPowCAT) is a free, open-source toolbox, which works as an EEGLAB extension.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/24/7040EEGMEGfourier transformcross-frequency couplingcomodulogramcomodugram
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nattapong Thammasan
Makoto Miyakoshi
spellingShingle Nattapong Thammasan
Makoto Miyakoshi
Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG
Sensors
EEG
MEG
fourier transform
cross-frequency coupling
comodulogram
comodugram
author_facet Nattapong Thammasan
Makoto Miyakoshi
author_sort Nattapong Thammasan
title Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG
title_short Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG
title_full Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG
title_fullStr Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG
title_full_unstemmed Cross-Frequency Power-Power Coupling Analysis: A Useful Cross-Frequency Measure to Classify ICA-Decomposed EEG
title_sort cross-frequency power-power coupling analysis: a useful cross-frequency measure to classify ica-decomposed eeg
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Magneto-/Electro-encephalography (M/EEG) commonly uses (fast) Fourier transformation to compute power spectral density (PSD). However, the resulting PSD plot lacks temporal information, making interpretation sometimes equivocal. For example, consider two different PSDs: a central parietal EEG PSD with twin peaks at 10 Hz and 20 Hz and a central parietal PSD with twin peaks at 10 Hz and 50 Hz. We can assume the first PSD shows a mu rhythm and the second harmonic; however, the latter PSD likely shows an alpha peak and an independent line noise. Without prior knowledge, however, the PSD alone cannot distinguish between the two cases. To address this limitation of PSD, we propose using <i>cross-frequency power–power coupling</i> (PPC) as a post-processing of independent component (IC) analysis (ICA) to distinguish brain components from muscle and environmental artifact sources. We conclude that post-ICA PPC analysis could serve as a new data-driven EEG classifier in M/EEG studies. For the reader’s convenience, we offer a brief literature overview on the disparate use of PPC. The proposed cross-frequency <i>power–power coupling analysis toolbox</i> (PowPowCAT) is a free, open-source toolbox, which works as an EEGLAB extension.
topic EEG
MEG
fourier transform
cross-frequency coupling
comodulogram
comodugram
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/24/7040
work_keys_str_mv AT nattapongthammasan crossfrequencypowerpowercouplinganalysisausefulcrossfrequencymeasuretoclassifyicadecomposedeeg
AT makotomiyakoshi crossfrequencypowerpowercouplinganalysisausefulcrossfrequencymeasuretoclassifyicadecomposedeeg
_version_ 1724387921865211904