Superior design solutions of section sizes in steel buildings for different lateral frame systems and column shapes

Superior design solutions of section sizes in steel buildings for different lateral frame systems and column shapes

Abstract Superior design solutions of 7‐story steel buildings are obtained by the multiple start local search (MSLS) method, minimizing the steel volume for three types of structural systems: a space‐frame system with rectangular hollow structural section (HSS) columns (SFS), perimeter‐frame system...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiro Takagi, Ruka Obana, Makoto Ohsaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-10-01
Series:Japan Architectural Review
Subjects:
lateral frame location
multiple start local search
response history analysis
steel structure
ultimate lateral strength
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/2475-8876.12156
id doaj-f98cab53957f4ff2928334ce7d70df77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f98cab53957f4ff2928334ce7d70df772021-05-02T22:02:36ZengWileyJapan Architectural Review2475-88762020-10-013444545810.1002/2475-8876.12156Superior design solutions of section sizes in steel buildings for different lateral frame systems and column shapesJiro Takagi0Ruka Obana1Makoto Ohsaki2Graduate School of Urban Environmental Sciences Tokyo Metropolitan University Hachioji‐shi, Tokyo JapanDepartment of Architecture and Architectural Engineering Tokyo Metropolitan University Hachioji‐shi, Tokyo JapanDepartment of Architecture and Architectural Engineering Kyoto University Kyoto JapanAbstract Superior design solutions of 7‐story steel buildings are obtained by the multiple start local search (MSLS) method, minimizing the steel volume for three types of structural systems: a space‐frame system with rectangular hollow structural section (HSS) columns (SFS), perimeter‐frame system (PFS) with I‐shaped columns (PFSH), and a PFS with rectangular HSS columns (PFSB). Most beam‐to‐column connections are moment connections in SFS, whereas they are limited in PFS. In terms of steel volume, PFSH is advantageous for moment‐frame buildings, and SFS and PFSB are suitable for braced frames with uniform column spacings. SFS is disadvantageous for mixed‐, moment‐, and braced‐frame buildings.https://doi.org/10.1002/2475-8876.12156lateral frame locationmultiple start local searchresponse history analysissteel structureultimate lateral strength
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jiro Takagi
Ruka Obana
Makoto Ohsaki
spellingShingle Jiro Takagi
Ruka Obana
Makoto Ohsaki
Superior design solutions of section sizes in steel buildings for different lateral frame systems and column shapes
Japan Architectural Review
lateral frame location
multiple start local search
response history analysis
steel structure
ultimate lateral strength
author_facet Jiro Takagi
Ruka Obana
Makoto Ohsaki
author_sort Jiro Takagi
title Superior design solutions of section sizes in steel buildings for different lateral frame systems and column shapes
title_short Superior design solutions of section sizes in steel buildings for different lateral frame systems and column shapes
title_full Superior design solutions of section sizes in steel buildings for different lateral frame systems and column shapes
title_fullStr Superior design solutions of section sizes in steel buildings for different lateral frame systems and column shapes
title_full_unstemmed Superior design solutions of section sizes in steel buildings for different lateral frame systems and column shapes
title_sort superior design solutions of section sizes in steel buildings for different lateral frame systems and column shapes
publisher Wiley
series Japan Architectural Review
issn 2475-8876
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Abstract Superior design solutions of 7‐story steel buildings are obtained by the multiple start local search (MSLS) method, minimizing the steel volume for three types of structural systems: a space‐frame system with rectangular hollow structural section (HSS) columns (SFS), perimeter‐frame system (PFS) with I‐shaped columns (PFSH), and a PFS with rectangular HSS columns (PFSB). Most beam‐to‐column connections are moment connections in SFS, whereas they are limited in PFS. In terms of steel volume, PFSH is advantageous for moment‐frame buildings, and SFS and PFSB are suitable for braced frames with uniform column spacings. SFS is disadvantageous for mixed‐, moment‐, and braced‐frame buildings.
topic lateral frame location
multiple start local search
response history analysis
steel structure
ultimate lateral strength
url https://doi.org/10.1002/2475-8876.12156
work_keys_str_mv AT jirotakagi superiordesignsolutionsofsectionsizesinsteelbuildingsfordifferentlateralframesystemsandcolumnshapes
AT rukaobana superiordesignsolutionsofsectionsizesinsteelbuildingsfordifferentlateralframesystemsandcolumnshapes
AT makotoohsaki superiordesignsolutionsofsectionsizesinsteelbuildingsfordifferentlateralframesystemsandcolumnshapes
_version_ 1721487157939404800

Similar Items