Self-Reported Recovery from 2-Week 12-Hour Shift Work Schedules: A 14-Day Follow-Up
Background: Recovery from fatigue is important in maintaining night workers' health. This study compared the course of self-reported recovery after 2-week 12-hour schedules consisting of either night shifts or swing shifts (i.e., 7 night shifts followed by 7 day shifts) to such schedules consis...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2015-09-01
|
Series: | Safety and Health at Work |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791115000591 |
id |
doaj-f97dc66817f14e39893a4604943fab92 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f97dc66817f14e39893a4604943fab922020-11-24T22:49:37ZengElsevierSafety and Health at Work2093-79112015-09-016324024810.1016/j.shaw.2015.07.003Self-Reported Recovery from 2-Week 12-Hour Shift Work Schedules: A 14-Day Follow-UpSuzanne L. Merkus0Kari Anne Holte1Maaike A. Huysmans2Peter M. van de Ven3Willem van Mechelen4Allard J. van der Beek5Work and Safety Research Group, International Research Institute of Stavanger, Stavanger, NorwayWork and Safety Research Group, International Research Institute of Stavanger, Stavanger, NorwayDepartment of Public and Occupational Health and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Public and Occupational Health and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Public and Occupational Health and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsBackground: Recovery from fatigue is important in maintaining night workers' health. This study compared the course of self-reported recovery after 2-week 12-hour schedules consisting of either night shifts or swing shifts (i.e., 7 night shifts followed by 7 day shifts) to such schedules consisting of only day work. Methods: Sixty-one male offshore employees—20 night workers, 16 swing shift workers, and 25 day workers—rated six questions on fatigue (sleep quality, feeling rested, physical and mental fatigue, and energy levels; scale 1–11) for 14 days after an offshore tour. After the two night-work schedules, differences on the 1st day (main effects) and differences during the follow-up (interaction effects) were compared to day work with generalized estimating equations analysis. Results: After adjustment for confounders, significant main effects were found for sleep quality for night workers (1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.89) and swing shift workers (1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.94) when compared to day workers; their interaction terms were not statistically significant. For the remaining fatigue outcomes, no statistically significant main or interaction effects were found. Conclusion: After 2-week 12-hour night and swing shifts, only the course for sleep quality differed from that of day work. Sleep quality was poorer for night and swing shift workers on the 1st day off and remained poorer for the 14-day follow-up. This showed that while working at night had no effect on feeling rested, tiredness, and energy levels, it had a relatively long-lasting effect on sleep quality.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791115000591fatiguelong working hoursnight workoffshore workersrecovery after work |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Suzanne L. Merkus Kari Anne Holte Maaike A. Huysmans Peter M. van de Ven Willem van Mechelen Allard J. van der Beek |
spellingShingle |
Suzanne L. Merkus Kari Anne Holte Maaike A. Huysmans Peter M. van de Ven Willem van Mechelen Allard J. van der Beek Self-Reported Recovery from 2-Week 12-Hour Shift Work Schedules: A 14-Day Follow-Up Safety and Health at Work fatigue long working hours night work offshore workers recovery after work |
author_facet |
Suzanne L. Merkus Kari Anne Holte Maaike A. Huysmans Peter M. van de Ven Willem van Mechelen Allard J. van der Beek |
author_sort |
Suzanne L. Merkus |
title |
Self-Reported Recovery from 2-Week 12-Hour Shift Work Schedules: A 14-Day Follow-Up |
title_short |
Self-Reported Recovery from 2-Week 12-Hour Shift Work Schedules: A 14-Day Follow-Up |
title_full |
Self-Reported Recovery from 2-Week 12-Hour Shift Work Schedules: A 14-Day Follow-Up |
title_fullStr |
Self-Reported Recovery from 2-Week 12-Hour Shift Work Schedules: A 14-Day Follow-Up |
title_full_unstemmed |
Self-Reported Recovery from 2-Week 12-Hour Shift Work Schedules: A 14-Day Follow-Up |
title_sort |
self-reported recovery from 2-week 12-hour shift work schedules: a 14-day follow-up |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Safety and Health at Work |
issn |
2093-7911 |
publishDate |
2015-09-01 |
description |
Background: Recovery from fatigue is important in maintaining night workers' health. This study compared the course of self-reported recovery after 2-week 12-hour schedules consisting of either night shifts or swing shifts (i.e., 7 night shifts followed by 7 day shifts) to such schedules consisting of only day work.
Methods: Sixty-one male offshore employees—20 night workers, 16 swing shift workers, and 25 day workers—rated six questions on fatigue (sleep quality, feeling rested, physical and mental fatigue, and energy levels; scale 1–11) for 14 days after an offshore tour. After the two night-work schedules, differences on the 1st day (main effects) and differences during the follow-up (interaction effects) were compared to day work with generalized estimating equations analysis.
Results: After adjustment for confounders, significant main effects were found for sleep quality for night workers (1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.89) and swing shift workers (1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.94) when compared to day workers; their interaction terms were not statistically significant. For the remaining fatigue outcomes, no statistically significant main or interaction effects were found.
Conclusion: After 2-week 12-hour night and swing shifts, only the course for sleep quality differed from that of day work. Sleep quality was poorer for night and swing shift workers on the 1st day off and remained poorer for the 14-day follow-up. This showed that while working at night had no effect on feeling rested, tiredness, and energy levels, it had a relatively long-lasting effect on sleep quality. |
topic |
fatigue long working hours night work offshore workers recovery after work |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791115000591 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT suzannelmerkus selfreportedrecoveryfrom2week12hourshiftworkschedulesa14dayfollowup AT karianneholte selfreportedrecoveryfrom2week12hourshiftworkschedulesa14dayfollowup AT maaikeahuysmans selfreportedrecoveryfrom2week12hourshiftworkschedulesa14dayfollowup AT petermvandeven selfreportedrecoveryfrom2week12hourshiftworkschedulesa14dayfollowup AT willemvanmechelen selfreportedrecoveryfrom2week12hourshiftworkschedulesa14dayfollowup AT allardjvanderbeek selfreportedrecoveryfrom2week12hourshiftworkschedulesa14dayfollowup |
_version_ |
1725675601098964992 |