Thinking as Drawing – Reflections on a Drawing that No Longer Exists

Architects use graphic representation to invent architectural objects. As it is not the architect who builds the architectural objects, that work is done by others, it is through confrontation with the object’s representation, and not through confrontation with the construction thereof, that such ob...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Teresa Belo Rodeia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Athens Institute for Education and Research 2019-10-01
Series:Athens Journal of Architecture
Online Access:https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2019-5-4-3-Rodeia.pdf
id doaj-f96fa794262842e28b8147a89c640ca5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f96fa794262842e28b8147a89c640ca52020-11-25T04:10:33ZengAthens Institute for Education and ResearchAthens Journal of Architecture2407-94722407-94722019-10-0154367390https://doi.org/10.30958/aja.5-4-3Thinking as Drawing – Reflections on a Drawing that No Longer ExistsTeresa Belo Rodeia0Assistant Professor/Research Fellow, Lusíada University, Lisbon/CITAD, Lusíada University, Lisbon, PortugalArchitects use graphic representation to invent architectural objects. As it is not the architect who builds the architectural objects, that work is done by others, it is through confrontation with the object’s representation, and not through confrontation with the construction thereof, that such objects are created. One could accept, perhaps it is even desirable, that the drawing is a translation of the thought, returning it to the creator in a new form; but one would also have to acknowledge that the drawing never reveals itself to be an exact record of the thought process. Nevertheless, it is through the drawing that thought becomes understandable, so any lack of correspondence between thought and its representation must be regarded as something more than a deficiency. It is also important to consider the drawing to be more than just a reflection of the thought one wishes to develop further. In contemporary architectural design practice the drawing no longer enjoys the hegemony that a certain nostalgic idealisation of the work of the architect would confer upon it, but the relationship between the drawing and the design thought process remains closely knit, in that the creation of architectural objects continues to be dependent on representation thereof. Using a specific design process as an example – the Gallo House (1968-1970), in São Pedro de Moel, Portugal, by Manuel Mendes Tainha – in which the drawing was a decisive presence, this paper seeks to study the relations between thought and representation beyond the general notion of a certain subordination of the representation to the thought that brings it about. It is through the drawing that the thought can be realised, for it then to be confronted with the drawing.https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2019-5-4-3-Rodeia.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Teresa Belo Rodeia
spellingShingle Teresa Belo Rodeia
Thinking as Drawing – Reflections on a Drawing that No Longer Exists
Athens Journal of Architecture
author_facet Teresa Belo Rodeia
author_sort Teresa Belo Rodeia
title Thinking as Drawing – Reflections on a Drawing that No Longer Exists
title_short Thinking as Drawing – Reflections on a Drawing that No Longer Exists
title_full Thinking as Drawing – Reflections on a Drawing that No Longer Exists
title_fullStr Thinking as Drawing – Reflections on a Drawing that No Longer Exists
title_full_unstemmed Thinking as Drawing – Reflections on a Drawing that No Longer Exists
title_sort thinking as drawing – reflections on a drawing that no longer exists
publisher Athens Institute for Education and Research
series Athens Journal of Architecture
issn 2407-9472
2407-9472
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Architects use graphic representation to invent architectural objects. As it is not the architect who builds the architectural objects, that work is done by others, it is through confrontation with the object’s representation, and not through confrontation with the construction thereof, that such objects are created. One could accept, perhaps it is even desirable, that the drawing is a translation of the thought, returning it to the creator in a new form; but one would also have to acknowledge that the drawing never reveals itself to be an exact record of the thought process. Nevertheless, it is through the drawing that thought becomes understandable, so any lack of correspondence between thought and its representation must be regarded as something more than a deficiency. It is also important to consider the drawing to be more than just a reflection of the thought one wishes to develop further. In contemporary architectural design practice the drawing no longer enjoys the hegemony that a certain nostalgic idealisation of the work of the architect would confer upon it, but the relationship between the drawing and the design thought process remains closely knit, in that the creation of architectural objects continues to be dependent on representation thereof. Using a specific design process as an example – the Gallo House (1968-1970), in São Pedro de Moel, Portugal, by Manuel Mendes Tainha – in which the drawing was a decisive presence, this paper seeks to study the relations between thought and representation beyond the general notion of a certain subordination of the representation to the thought that brings it about. It is through the drawing that the thought can be realised, for it then to be confronted with the drawing.
url https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2019-5-4-3-Rodeia.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT teresabelorodeia thinkingasdrawingreflectionsonadrawingthatnolongerexists
_version_ 1724420136059797504