How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves

Abstract Testing oneself (i.e., doing retrieval practice) is an effective way to study. We attempted to make learners choose to test themselves more often. In Experiment 1, participants were asked how they wanted to study and were given four options: retrieval with no hint (e.g., idea: ______), a tw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kalif E. Vaughn, Nate Kornell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-09-01
Series:Cognitive Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41235-019-0187-y
id doaj-f954dffe48ab416790ae745b497f11a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f954dffe48ab416790ae745b497f11a92020-11-25T03:31:14ZengSpringerOpenCognitive Research2365-74642019-09-014111610.1186/s41235-019-0187-yHow to activate students’ natural desire to test themselvesKalif E. Vaughn0Nate Kornell1Northern Kentucky UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Williams CollegeAbstract Testing oneself (i.e., doing retrieval practice) is an effective way to study. We attempted to make learners choose to test themselves more often. In Experiment 1, participants were asked how they wanted to study and were given four options: retrieval with no hint (e.g., idea: ______), a two-letter hint (e.g., idea: s____r), a four-letter hint (e.g., idea: se__er), or a presentation trial (e.g., idea: seeker). They tested themselves on the majority of trials. In Experiment 2, when the hint options were removed, they chose restudy rather than pure test on the majority of trials. These findings show that people prefer self-testing over restudy as long as they can get the answer right on the test. However, we would not recommend hints if they impaired learning compared to pure testing. Experiment 3 showed that this was not the case; the three retrieval conditions from Experiment 1 led to equivalent amounts of learning, and all three outperformed the pure presentation condition. We used different materials in Experiment 4 and found that the hints made retrieval slightly less beneficial when the hints made it possible to guess the answers without thinking back to the study phase (e.g., whip: pu__sh). In summary, hints catalyzed people’s intuitive desire to self-test, without any downside for learning, thus making their self-regulated study more enjoyable and effective.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41235-019-0187-ySelf-testingHintsMemory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kalif E. Vaughn
Nate Kornell
spellingShingle Kalif E. Vaughn
Nate Kornell
How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves
Cognitive Research
Self-testing
Hints
Memory
author_facet Kalif E. Vaughn
Nate Kornell
author_sort Kalif E. Vaughn
title How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves
title_short How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves
title_full How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves
title_fullStr How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves
title_full_unstemmed How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves
title_sort how to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves
publisher SpringerOpen
series Cognitive Research
issn 2365-7464
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Abstract Testing oneself (i.e., doing retrieval practice) is an effective way to study. We attempted to make learners choose to test themselves more often. In Experiment 1, participants were asked how they wanted to study and were given four options: retrieval with no hint (e.g., idea: ______), a two-letter hint (e.g., idea: s____r), a four-letter hint (e.g., idea: se__er), or a presentation trial (e.g., idea: seeker). They tested themselves on the majority of trials. In Experiment 2, when the hint options were removed, they chose restudy rather than pure test on the majority of trials. These findings show that people prefer self-testing over restudy as long as they can get the answer right on the test. However, we would not recommend hints if they impaired learning compared to pure testing. Experiment 3 showed that this was not the case; the three retrieval conditions from Experiment 1 led to equivalent amounts of learning, and all three outperformed the pure presentation condition. We used different materials in Experiment 4 and found that the hints made retrieval slightly less beneficial when the hints made it possible to guess the answers without thinking back to the study phase (e.g., whip: pu__sh). In summary, hints catalyzed people’s intuitive desire to self-test, without any downside for learning, thus making their self-regulated study more enjoyable and effective.
topic Self-testing
Hints
Memory
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41235-019-0187-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kalifevaughn howtoactivatestudentsnaturaldesiretotestthemselves
AT natekornell howtoactivatestudentsnaturaldesiretotestthemselves
_version_ 1724572753713954816