How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves
Abstract Testing oneself (i.e., doing retrieval practice) is an effective way to study. We attempted to make learners choose to test themselves more often. In Experiment 1, participants were asked how they wanted to study and were given four options: retrieval with no hint (e.g., idea: ______), a tw...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Cognitive Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41235-019-0187-y |
id |
doaj-f954dffe48ab416790ae745b497f11a9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f954dffe48ab416790ae745b497f11a92020-11-25T03:31:14ZengSpringerOpenCognitive Research2365-74642019-09-014111610.1186/s41235-019-0187-yHow to activate students’ natural desire to test themselvesKalif E. Vaughn0Nate Kornell1Northern Kentucky UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Williams CollegeAbstract Testing oneself (i.e., doing retrieval practice) is an effective way to study. We attempted to make learners choose to test themselves more often. In Experiment 1, participants were asked how they wanted to study and were given four options: retrieval with no hint (e.g., idea: ______), a two-letter hint (e.g., idea: s____r), a four-letter hint (e.g., idea: se__er), or a presentation trial (e.g., idea: seeker). They tested themselves on the majority of trials. In Experiment 2, when the hint options were removed, they chose restudy rather than pure test on the majority of trials. These findings show that people prefer self-testing over restudy as long as they can get the answer right on the test. However, we would not recommend hints if they impaired learning compared to pure testing. Experiment 3 showed that this was not the case; the three retrieval conditions from Experiment 1 led to equivalent amounts of learning, and all three outperformed the pure presentation condition. We used different materials in Experiment 4 and found that the hints made retrieval slightly less beneficial when the hints made it possible to guess the answers without thinking back to the study phase (e.g., whip: pu__sh). In summary, hints catalyzed people’s intuitive desire to self-test, without any downside for learning, thus making their self-regulated study more enjoyable and effective.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41235-019-0187-ySelf-testingHintsMemory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kalif E. Vaughn Nate Kornell |
spellingShingle |
Kalif E. Vaughn Nate Kornell How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves Cognitive Research Self-testing Hints Memory |
author_facet |
Kalif E. Vaughn Nate Kornell |
author_sort |
Kalif E. Vaughn |
title |
How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves |
title_short |
How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves |
title_full |
How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves |
title_fullStr |
How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves |
title_full_unstemmed |
How to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves |
title_sort |
how to activate students’ natural desire to test themselves |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Cognitive Research |
issn |
2365-7464 |
publishDate |
2019-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Testing oneself (i.e., doing retrieval practice) is an effective way to study. We attempted to make learners choose to test themselves more often. In Experiment 1, participants were asked how they wanted to study and were given four options: retrieval with no hint (e.g., idea: ______), a two-letter hint (e.g., idea: s____r), a four-letter hint (e.g., idea: se__er), or a presentation trial (e.g., idea: seeker). They tested themselves on the majority of trials. In Experiment 2, when the hint options were removed, they chose restudy rather than pure test on the majority of trials. These findings show that people prefer self-testing over restudy as long as they can get the answer right on the test. However, we would not recommend hints if they impaired learning compared to pure testing. Experiment 3 showed that this was not the case; the three retrieval conditions from Experiment 1 led to equivalent amounts of learning, and all three outperformed the pure presentation condition. We used different materials in Experiment 4 and found that the hints made retrieval slightly less beneficial when the hints made it possible to guess the answers without thinking back to the study phase (e.g., whip: pu__sh). In summary, hints catalyzed people’s intuitive desire to self-test, without any downside for learning, thus making their self-regulated study more enjoyable and effective. |
topic |
Self-testing Hints Memory |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41235-019-0187-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kalifevaughn howtoactivatestudentsnaturaldesiretotestthemselves AT natekornell howtoactivatestudentsnaturaldesiretotestthemselves |
_version_ |
1724572753713954816 |