Patching and Suppression in Amblyopia: One Mechanism or Two?

PurposeTo determine if benefits from occlusion therapy are due to decreased suppression from the fellow eye in children with amblyopia.MethodsTen newly diagnosed amblyopes (7.2 ± 1.4 years old), two with strabismus and eight with anisometropia, participated. Patients were first given a 2-month perio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yiya Chen, Zhifen He, Yu Mao, Hao Chen, Jiawei Zhou, Robert F. Hess
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2019.01364/full
Description
Summary:PurposeTo determine if benefits from occlusion therapy are due to decreased suppression from the fellow eye in children with amblyopia.MethodsTen newly diagnosed amblyopes (7.2 ± 1.4 years old), two with strabismus and eight with anisometropia, participated. Patients were first given a 2-month period of refractive adaptation, followed by occlusion therapy (i.e., patching their fellow eye with an opaque patch for 4 h/day). Visual acuity of the amblyopic eye and interocular suppression were measured before and after 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 months of occlusion therapy. We quantified interocular suppression with a binocular phase combination task.ResultsVisual acuity (in logMAR) improved from 0.50 ± 0.22 (mean ± SD) to 0.33 ± 0.20 for patients who finished a short-term (2 months) occlusion (A1–A10), from 0.53 ± 0.20 to 0.32 ± 0.22 for patients who finished a medium-term (4 months) occlusion (A1–A9), and from 0.48 ± 0.19 to 0.22 ± 0.10 for patients who finished a long-term (6 months) occlusion (A1–A8). Although their visual acuity significantly improved, their degree of suppression, which was abnormal in all cases, did not change consistently. This was true in all durations of occlusion therapy.ConclusionReduced suppression from the fixing eye might not be result from occlusion therapy.
ISSN:1662-453X