Senate Voting On the Strategic Defense Initiative: The Impact of the 1991 Gulf War

This paper examines the effects of the success of the Patriot missile system in the 1991 Gulf War on Senate roll call votes for the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Previous studies have shown that both Party Identification (PID) and Ideology have had a significant effect on senators' votes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James F. Pasley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lindenwood University 2012-04-01
Series:Journal of International and Global Studies
Online Access:http://www.lindenwood.edu/jigs/docs/volume3Issue2/essays/66-74.pdf
id doaj-f94f77b2330047018baa45b8a679c740
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f94f77b2330047018baa45b8a679c7402020-11-25T01:23:54ZengLindenwood UniversityJournal of International and Global Studies2158-06692012-04-01326674Senate Voting On the Strategic Defense Initiative: The Impact of the 1991 Gulf War James F. PasleyThis paper examines the effects of the success of the Patriot missile system in the 1991 Gulf War on Senate roll call votes for the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Previous studies have shown that both Party Identification (PID) and Ideology have had a significant effect on senators' votes on defense weapons systems. Using Logit regression techniques, this paper examines whether PID and Ideology, both of which are central to political identity, remained significant factors in three Senate votes on SDI; this paper is unique compare to previous studies of such matters in that it adds two additional explanatory variables to existing models: (1) the extent to which each state might benefit from SDI and (2) whether or not the senator from each state was up for re-election in 1992 It is hypothesized that the findings will suggest that external factors played a role in the SDI Senate votes in question. Specifically, it is hypothesized that the effects of the Gulf War Patriot missile successes led to greater legislative support (compared to support levels from previous years) for the Strategic Defense Initiative among Democrats, those senators whose states would benefit from SDI funding, and those senators seeking re-election.http://www.lindenwood.edu/jigs/docs/volume3Issue2/essays/66-74.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James F. Pasley
spellingShingle James F. Pasley
Senate Voting On the Strategic Defense Initiative: The Impact of the 1991 Gulf War
Journal of International and Global Studies
author_facet James F. Pasley
author_sort James F. Pasley
title Senate Voting On the Strategic Defense Initiative: The Impact of the 1991 Gulf War
title_short Senate Voting On the Strategic Defense Initiative: The Impact of the 1991 Gulf War
title_full Senate Voting On the Strategic Defense Initiative: The Impact of the 1991 Gulf War
title_fullStr Senate Voting On the Strategic Defense Initiative: The Impact of the 1991 Gulf War
title_full_unstemmed Senate Voting On the Strategic Defense Initiative: The Impact of the 1991 Gulf War
title_sort senate voting on the strategic defense initiative: the impact of the 1991 gulf war
publisher Lindenwood University
series Journal of International and Global Studies
issn 2158-0669
publishDate 2012-04-01
description This paper examines the effects of the success of the Patriot missile system in the 1991 Gulf War on Senate roll call votes for the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Previous studies have shown that both Party Identification (PID) and Ideology have had a significant effect on senators' votes on defense weapons systems. Using Logit regression techniques, this paper examines whether PID and Ideology, both of which are central to political identity, remained significant factors in three Senate votes on SDI; this paper is unique compare to previous studies of such matters in that it adds two additional explanatory variables to existing models: (1) the extent to which each state might benefit from SDI and (2) whether or not the senator from each state was up for re-election in 1992 It is hypothesized that the findings will suggest that external factors played a role in the SDI Senate votes in question. Specifically, it is hypothesized that the effects of the Gulf War Patriot missile successes led to greater legislative support (compared to support levels from previous years) for the Strategic Defense Initiative among Democrats, those senators whose states would benefit from SDI funding, and those senators seeking re-election.
url http://www.lindenwood.edu/jigs/docs/volume3Issue2/essays/66-74.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesfpasley senatevotingonthestrategicdefenseinitiativetheimpactofthe1991gulfwar
_version_ 1725120201518743552