Decentralisation Versus Territorial Inequality: A Comparative Review of English City Region Policy Discourse

The most recent English attempts at decentralisation take the shape of the city region devolution policy agenda. Decentralisation claims to empower localities and address regional growth imbalances, while creating a variety of new temporary and selective fiscal and geographic arrangements in policy-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carina Schneider, Clémentine Cottineau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-08-01
Series:Urban Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/3/3/90
id doaj-f9488ccc5959405198da0ab5cc4edc4e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f9488ccc5959405198da0ab5cc4edc4e2020-11-24T22:12:41ZengMDPI AGUrban Science2413-88512019-08-01339010.3390/urbansci3030090urbansci3030090Decentralisation Versus Territorial Inequality: A Comparative Review of English City Region Policy DiscourseCarina Schneider0Clémentine Cottineau1Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London WC1H 0NN, UKCentre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, London W1T4TJ, UKThe most recent English attempts at decentralisation take the shape of the city region devolution policy agenda. Decentralisation claims to empower localities and address regional growth imbalances, while creating a variety of new temporary and selective fiscal and geographic arrangements in policy-making that have the potential to create the opposite effect. This paper focuses on the relationship between decentralisation and territorial inequalities through the analysis of strategic discourse of six ‘devolved authorities’. A quantitative, qualitative, and comparative approach to this question complements the traditional insights obtained from in-depth case study analysis using actors’ interviews. It focuses on city regions’ official discourse of self-conceptualisation and marketization, and thereby highlights the wider policy and regional theory context of their production to frame the structural factors impacting the rewriting of city regional space. By doing so, we find a number of issues with the current decentralisation approach in competing priorities between localities, an over-reliance on agglomeration economies and urban competition, potential mismatches in scales of policy decision-making and delivery, and challenges regarding inequalities in a post-Brexit England.https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/3/3/90decentralisationcity regionEnglanddiscourse analysisterritorial inequality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carina Schneider
Clémentine Cottineau
spellingShingle Carina Schneider
Clémentine Cottineau
Decentralisation Versus Territorial Inequality: A Comparative Review of English City Region Policy Discourse
Urban Science
decentralisation
city region
England
discourse analysis
territorial inequality
author_facet Carina Schneider
Clémentine Cottineau
author_sort Carina Schneider
title Decentralisation Versus Territorial Inequality: A Comparative Review of English City Region Policy Discourse
title_short Decentralisation Versus Territorial Inequality: A Comparative Review of English City Region Policy Discourse
title_full Decentralisation Versus Territorial Inequality: A Comparative Review of English City Region Policy Discourse
title_fullStr Decentralisation Versus Territorial Inequality: A Comparative Review of English City Region Policy Discourse
title_full_unstemmed Decentralisation Versus Territorial Inequality: A Comparative Review of English City Region Policy Discourse
title_sort decentralisation versus territorial inequality: a comparative review of english city region policy discourse
publisher MDPI AG
series Urban Science
issn 2413-8851
publishDate 2019-08-01
description The most recent English attempts at decentralisation take the shape of the city region devolution policy agenda. Decentralisation claims to empower localities and address regional growth imbalances, while creating a variety of new temporary and selective fiscal and geographic arrangements in policy-making that have the potential to create the opposite effect. This paper focuses on the relationship between decentralisation and territorial inequalities through the analysis of strategic discourse of six ‘devolved authorities’. A quantitative, qualitative, and comparative approach to this question complements the traditional insights obtained from in-depth case study analysis using actors’ interviews. It focuses on city regions’ official discourse of self-conceptualisation and marketization, and thereby highlights the wider policy and regional theory context of their production to frame the structural factors impacting the rewriting of city regional space. By doing so, we find a number of issues with the current decentralisation approach in competing priorities between localities, an over-reliance on agglomeration economies and urban competition, potential mismatches in scales of policy decision-making and delivery, and challenges regarding inequalities in a post-Brexit England.
topic decentralisation
city region
England
discourse analysis
territorial inequality
url https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/3/3/90
work_keys_str_mv AT carinaschneider decentralisationversusterritorialinequalityacomparativereviewofenglishcityregionpolicydiscourse
AT clementinecottineau decentralisationversusterritorialinequalityacomparativereviewofenglishcityregionpolicydiscourse
_version_ 1725802786642198528