Evaluation of WRF-SFIRE performance with field observations from the FireFlux experiment

This study uses in situ measurements collected during the FireFlux field experiment to evaluate and improve the performance of the coupled atmosphere–fire model WRF-SFIRE. The simulation by WRF-SFIRE of the experimental burn shows that WRF-SFIRE is capable of providing realistic head-fire rate of sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. K. Kochanski, M. A. Jenkins, J. Mandel, J. D. Beezley, C. B. Clements, S. Krueger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013-08-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/1109/2013/gmd-6-1109-2013.pdf
id doaj-f93fda2e4363423ab698b6336d341897
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f93fda2e4363423ab698b6336d3418972020-11-24T20:44:47ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032013-08-01641109112610.5194/gmd-6-1109-2013Evaluation of WRF-SFIRE performance with field observations from the FireFlux experimentA. K. KochanskiM. A. JenkinsJ. MandelJ. D. BeezleyC. B. ClementsS. KruegerThis study uses in situ measurements collected during the FireFlux field experiment to evaluate and improve the performance of the coupled atmosphere–fire model WRF-SFIRE. The simulation by WRF-SFIRE of the experimental burn shows that WRF-SFIRE is capable of providing realistic head-fire rate of spread and vertical temperature structure of the fire plume, and fire-induced surface flow and vertical velocities within the plume up to 10 m above ground level. The simulation captured the changes in wind speed and direction before, during, and after fire front passage, along with the arrival times of wind speed, temperature, and updraft maxima, at the two instrumented flux towers used in FireFlux. The model overestimated vertical wind speeds and underestimated horizontal wind speeds measured at tower heights above 10 m. It is hypothesized that the limited model spatial resolution led to overestimates of the fire front depth, heat release rate, and updraft speed. However, on the whole, WRF-SFIRE simulated fire plume behavior that is consistent with FireFlux observations. The study suggests optimal experimental pre-planning, design, and execution strategies for future field campaigns that are intended to evaluate and develop further coupled atmosphere–fire models.http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/1109/2013/gmd-6-1109-2013.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. K. Kochanski
M. A. Jenkins
J. Mandel
J. D. Beezley
C. B. Clements
S. Krueger
spellingShingle A. K. Kochanski
M. A. Jenkins
J. Mandel
J. D. Beezley
C. B. Clements
S. Krueger
Evaluation of WRF-SFIRE performance with field observations from the FireFlux experiment
Geoscientific Model Development
author_facet A. K. Kochanski
M. A. Jenkins
J. Mandel
J. D. Beezley
C. B. Clements
S. Krueger
author_sort A. K. Kochanski
title Evaluation of WRF-SFIRE performance with field observations from the FireFlux experiment
title_short Evaluation of WRF-SFIRE performance with field observations from the FireFlux experiment
title_full Evaluation of WRF-SFIRE performance with field observations from the FireFlux experiment
title_fullStr Evaluation of WRF-SFIRE performance with field observations from the FireFlux experiment
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of WRF-SFIRE performance with field observations from the FireFlux experiment
title_sort evaluation of wrf-sfire performance with field observations from the fireflux experiment
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Geoscientific Model Development
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
publishDate 2013-08-01
description This study uses in situ measurements collected during the FireFlux field experiment to evaluate and improve the performance of the coupled atmosphere–fire model WRF-SFIRE. The simulation by WRF-SFIRE of the experimental burn shows that WRF-SFIRE is capable of providing realistic head-fire rate of spread and vertical temperature structure of the fire plume, and fire-induced surface flow and vertical velocities within the plume up to 10 m above ground level. The simulation captured the changes in wind speed and direction before, during, and after fire front passage, along with the arrival times of wind speed, temperature, and updraft maxima, at the two instrumented flux towers used in FireFlux. The model overestimated vertical wind speeds and underestimated horizontal wind speeds measured at tower heights above 10 m. It is hypothesized that the limited model spatial resolution led to overestimates of the fire front depth, heat release rate, and updraft speed. However, on the whole, WRF-SFIRE simulated fire plume behavior that is consistent with FireFlux observations. The study suggests optimal experimental pre-planning, design, and execution strategies for future field campaigns that are intended to evaluate and develop further coupled atmosphere–fire models.
url http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/6/1109/2013/gmd-6-1109-2013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT akkochanski evaluationofwrfsfireperformancewithfieldobservationsfromthefirefluxexperiment
AT majenkins evaluationofwrfsfireperformancewithfieldobservationsfromthefirefluxexperiment
AT jmandel evaluationofwrfsfireperformancewithfieldobservationsfromthefirefluxexperiment
AT jdbeezley evaluationofwrfsfireperformancewithfieldobservationsfromthefirefluxexperiment
AT cbclements evaluationofwrfsfireperformancewithfieldobservationsfromthefirefluxexperiment
AT skrueger evaluationofwrfsfireperformancewithfieldobservationsfromthefirefluxexperiment
_version_ 1716816653946191872