Quality of Life in Professional, Semiprofessional, and Amateur Athletes

The purpose of this study is to investigate the Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index (QLI) and its domains in Brazilian athletes. The sample comprised 219 athletes from six sports, and included 127 men and 92 women, with mean age of 23.1 years (±5.2). All participants were associated with a spor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ana Lúcia Padrão dos Santos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2013-07-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013497723
id doaj-f9320ab5d76040c98598acb5f6973f3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f9320ab5d76040c98598acb5f6973f3a2020-11-25T03:03:15ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402013-07-01310.1177/215824401349772310.1177_2158244013497723Quality of Life in Professional, Semiprofessional, and Amateur AthletesAna Lúcia Padrão dos Santos0University of São Paulo, BrazilThe purpose of this study is to investigate the Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index (QLI) and its domains in Brazilian athletes. The sample comprised 219 athletes from six sports, and included 127 men and 92 women, with mean age of 23.1 years (±5.2). All participants were associated with a sports organization and participated in official competitions at the professional, semiprofessional, and amateur levels, and completed a self-report demographics survey and the QLI during one testing session. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests were utilized to compare differences between competitive levels and gender, respectively. Significant differences were reported between professional and amateur athletes for the socioeconomic ( p = .016; professional: 17.2, amateur: 15.1) and psychological/spiritual ( p = .011; professional: 24.3, amateur: 21.9) domains and between genders on the family domain ( p = .027; male: 21.8, female: 20.2). These findings suggest that professional athletes are more satisfied from a socioeconomic and psychological/spiritual perspective when compared with the amateur group. In addition, the results suggest that family issues are more satisfying and/or have less importance for males than for females. This study provides further insights into the quality of life of athletes and suggests differences based on competition levels and gender. Future studies are needed to further our understanding of the quality of life in athletes.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013497723
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Lúcia Padrão dos Santos
spellingShingle Ana Lúcia Padrão dos Santos
Quality of Life in Professional, Semiprofessional, and Amateur Athletes
SAGE Open
author_facet Ana Lúcia Padrão dos Santos
author_sort Ana Lúcia Padrão dos Santos
title Quality of Life in Professional, Semiprofessional, and Amateur Athletes
title_short Quality of Life in Professional, Semiprofessional, and Amateur Athletes
title_full Quality of Life in Professional, Semiprofessional, and Amateur Athletes
title_fullStr Quality of Life in Professional, Semiprofessional, and Amateur Athletes
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Life in Professional, Semiprofessional, and Amateur Athletes
title_sort quality of life in professional, semiprofessional, and amateur athletes
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2013-07-01
description The purpose of this study is to investigate the Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index (QLI) and its domains in Brazilian athletes. The sample comprised 219 athletes from six sports, and included 127 men and 92 women, with mean age of 23.1 years (±5.2). All participants were associated with a sports organization and participated in official competitions at the professional, semiprofessional, and amateur levels, and completed a self-report demographics survey and the QLI during one testing session. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests were utilized to compare differences between competitive levels and gender, respectively. Significant differences were reported between professional and amateur athletes for the socioeconomic ( p = .016; professional: 17.2, amateur: 15.1) and psychological/spiritual ( p = .011; professional: 24.3, amateur: 21.9) domains and between genders on the family domain ( p = .027; male: 21.8, female: 20.2). These findings suggest that professional athletes are more satisfied from a socioeconomic and psychological/spiritual perspective when compared with the amateur group. In addition, the results suggest that family issues are more satisfying and/or have less importance for males than for females. This study provides further insights into the quality of life of athletes and suggests differences based on competition levels and gender. Future studies are needed to further our understanding of the quality of life in athletes.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013497723
work_keys_str_mv AT analuciapadraodossantos qualityoflifeinprofessionalsemiprofessionalandamateurathletes
_version_ 1724686757156356096