Sensor and Video: Two Complementary Approaches for Evaluation of Dairy Cow Behavior after Calving Sensor Attachment

Studies evaluating calving sensors provided evidence that attaching the sensor to the tail may lead to changes in the cows’ behavior. Two different calving sensors were attached to 18 cows, all of which were equipped with a rumen bolus to record their activity. Two methodological approaches were app...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johanna Pfeiffer, Olivia Spykman, Markus Gandorfer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/7/1917
id doaj-f926a7db7a3541f0af33916d1949643b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f926a7db7a3541f0af33916d1949643b2021-07-23T13:27:09ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-06-01111917191710.3390/ani11071917Sensor and Video: Two Complementary Approaches for Evaluation of Dairy Cow Behavior after Calving Sensor AttachmentJohanna Pfeiffer0Olivia Spykman1Markus Gandorfer2Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Animal Husbandry, 94099 Ruhstorf an der Rott, GermanyBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Animal Husbandry, 94099 Ruhstorf an der Rott, GermanyBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Animal Husbandry, 94099 Ruhstorf an der Rott, GermanyStudies evaluating calving sensors provided evidence that attaching the sensor to the tail may lead to changes in the cows’ behavior. Two different calving sensors were attached to 18 cows, all of which were equipped with a rumen bolus to record their activity. Two methodological approaches were applied to detect potential behavioral changes: analysis of homogeneity of variance in cow activity (5 days pre-sensor and 24 h post-sensor) and analysis of video-recorded behavior (12 h pre- and post-sensor, respectively) in a subgroup. The average results across the sample showed no significant changes in the variability of activity and no statistically significant mean differences in most visually analyzed behaviors, namely walking, eating, drinking, social interaction, tail raising, rubbing the tail, and the number of standing and lying bouts after calving sensor attachment. In addition to considering mean values across all cows, individual cow investigations revealed an increased number of time slots showing a significant increase in the variability of activity and an increased frequency of tail raising and rubbing the tail on objects after calving sensor attachment in some cows, which should be investigated in more detail on a larger scale.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/7/1917activityBrown–Forsythe testdigitalvariancevideo
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Johanna Pfeiffer
Olivia Spykman
Markus Gandorfer
spellingShingle Johanna Pfeiffer
Olivia Spykman
Markus Gandorfer
Sensor and Video: Two Complementary Approaches for Evaluation of Dairy Cow Behavior after Calving Sensor Attachment
Animals
activity
Brown–Forsythe test
digital
variance
video
author_facet Johanna Pfeiffer
Olivia Spykman
Markus Gandorfer
author_sort Johanna Pfeiffer
title Sensor and Video: Two Complementary Approaches for Evaluation of Dairy Cow Behavior after Calving Sensor Attachment
title_short Sensor and Video: Two Complementary Approaches for Evaluation of Dairy Cow Behavior after Calving Sensor Attachment
title_full Sensor and Video: Two Complementary Approaches for Evaluation of Dairy Cow Behavior after Calving Sensor Attachment
title_fullStr Sensor and Video: Two Complementary Approaches for Evaluation of Dairy Cow Behavior after Calving Sensor Attachment
title_full_unstemmed Sensor and Video: Two Complementary Approaches for Evaluation of Dairy Cow Behavior after Calving Sensor Attachment
title_sort sensor and video: two complementary approaches for evaluation of dairy cow behavior after calving sensor attachment
publisher MDPI AG
series Animals
issn 2076-2615
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Studies evaluating calving sensors provided evidence that attaching the sensor to the tail may lead to changes in the cows’ behavior. Two different calving sensors were attached to 18 cows, all of which were equipped with a rumen bolus to record their activity. Two methodological approaches were applied to detect potential behavioral changes: analysis of homogeneity of variance in cow activity (5 days pre-sensor and 24 h post-sensor) and analysis of video-recorded behavior (12 h pre- and post-sensor, respectively) in a subgroup. The average results across the sample showed no significant changes in the variability of activity and no statistically significant mean differences in most visually analyzed behaviors, namely walking, eating, drinking, social interaction, tail raising, rubbing the tail, and the number of standing and lying bouts after calving sensor attachment. In addition to considering mean values across all cows, individual cow investigations revealed an increased number of time slots showing a significant increase in the variability of activity and an increased frequency of tail raising and rubbing the tail on objects after calving sensor attachment in some cows, which should be investigated in more detail on a larger scale.
topic activity
Brown–Forsythe test
digital
variance
video
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/7/1917
work_keys_str_mv AT johannapfeiffer sensorandvideotwocomplementaryapproachesforevaluationofdairycowbehavioraftercalvingsensorattachment
AT oliviaspykman sensorandvideotwocomplementaryapproachesforevaluationofdairycowbehavioraftercalvingsensorattachment
AT markusgandorfer sensorandvideotwocomplementaryapproachesforevaluationofdairycowbehavioraftercalvingsensorattachment
_version_ 1721289972650082304