Examination of Strength Modeling Reliability of Physical Tests on Structural Concrete Columns

Comparisons and analyses of strengths from selected computational procedures were undertaken of more than 500 physical tests of rectangular, tied, structural concrete columns reported in the published literature. The computational procedures compared with the physical tests and with each other inclu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sher Ali Mirza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2011-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/428367
id doaj-f902bbce34cb411e831d7eafaeebf82c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f902bbce34cb411e831d7eafaeebf82c2020-11-25T00:06:15ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80861687-80942011-01-01201110.1155/2011/428367428367Examination of Strength Modeling Reliability of Physical Tests on Structural Concrete ColumnsSher Ali Mirza0Civil Engineering, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 5E1, CanadaComparisons and analyses of strengths from selected computational procedures were undertaken of more than 500 physical tests of rectangular, tied, structural concrete columns reported in the published literature. The computational procedures compared with the physical tests and with each other include a commercially available nonlinear finite element modeling software and the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Standard A23.3-04. The requirements of the American Concrete Institute (ACI) 318-08 are very similar to those of the CSA A23.3-04, and hence, strength comparisons and analyses reported here are also applicable to ACI 318-08. The physical tests used for comparison were conducted on columns that were braced and pinned at both ends and were constructed using normal-density concrete with a compressive strength between approximately 17 and 57 MPa. The columns were subjected to short-term loads producing pure axial force, axial force combined with symmetrical single-curvature bending, or pure bending. Major variables included the concrete strength, the end eccentricity ratio, the slenderness ratio, the longitudinal reinforcing steel index for reinforced concrete or the structural steel index for composite columns, and the transverse reinforcement (tie/hoop) volumetric ratio. The study provides an examination of the reliability of the computational methods examined.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/428367
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sher Ali Mirza
spellingShingle Sher Ali Mirza
Examination of Strength Modeling Reliability of Physical Tests on Structural Concrete Columns
Advances in Civil Engineering
author_facet Sher Ali Mirza
author_sort Sher Ali Mirza
title Examination of Strength Modeling Reliability of Physical Tests on Structural Concrete Columns
title_short Examination of Strength Modeling Reliability of Physical Tests on Structural Concrete Columns
title_full Examination of Strength Modeling Reliability of Physical Tests on Structural Concrete Columns
title_fullStr Examination of Strength Modeling Reliability of Physical Tests on Structural Concrete Columns
title_full_unstemmed Examination of Strength Modeling Reliability of Physical Tests on Structural Concrete Columns
title_sort examination of strength modeling reliability of physical tests on structural concrete columns
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Civil Engineering
issn 1687-8086
1687-8094
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Comparisons and analyses of strengths from selected computational procedures were undertaken of more than 500 physical tests of rectangular, tied, structural concrete columns reported in the published literature. The computational procedures compared with the physical tests and with each other include a commercially available nonlinear finite element modeling software and the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Standard A23.3-04. The requirements of the American Concrete Institute (ACI) 318-08 are very similar to those of the CSA A23.3-04, and hence, strength comparisons and analyses reported here are also applicable to ACI 318-08. The physical tests used for comparison were conducted on columns that were braced and pinned at both ends and were constructed using normal-density concrete with a compressive strength between approximately 17 and 57 MPa. The columns were subjected to short-term loads producing pure axial force, axial force combined with symmetrical single-curvature bending, or pure bending. Major variables included the concrete strength, the end eccentricity ratio, the slenderness ratio, the longitudinal reinforcing steel index for reinforced concrete or the structural steel index for composite columns, and the transverse reinforcement (tie/hoop) volumetric ratio. The study provides an examination of the reliability of the computational methods examined.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/428367
work_keys_str_mv AT sheralimirza examinationofstrengthmodelingreliabilityofphysicaltestsonstructuralconcretecolumns
_version_ 1725423271853162496