Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales
This article’s objective consists in questioning the concepts used by researchers in the social sciences so as to understand radicalisation processes described as Islamic. If certain university disciplines like geopolitics or psychology propose global explanations on the subject of radicalisation, s...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Université Catholique de Louvain
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/rsa/4449 |
id |
doaj-f8fa95ecedbd43e0b183b6bef4ef2c0f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f8fa95ecedbd43e0b183b6bef4ef2c0f2021-07-08T16:31:35ZengUniversité Catholique de LouvainRecherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques1782-15922033-74852020-12-0151216318110.4000/rsa.4449Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences socialesÉric MarlièreThis article’s objective consists in questioning the concepts used by researchers in the social sciences so as to understand radicalisation processes described as Islamic. If certain university disciplines like geopolitics or psychology propose global explanations on the subject of radicalisation, sociologists appear to be more reserved or, in any case, more moderate as to the analyses to bring to the phenomenon. For that matter, the very concept of radicalisation is provoking debate within the discipline. Indeed, the various approaches in sociology remain too compartmentalised to permit a consensual analysis of jihadism to emerge. Hence the task here is one of proposing an inventory of some of the concepts mobilized in the social sciences on urban revolts in order to take a step back from the overarching interpretations of the phenomenon. Thus the concepts exposed here may not only clarify certain aspects of this complex object in analysing the paths of jihadists more closely, but also demonstrate complementarity with a view to enriching our knowledge of a controversial phenomenon.http://journals.openedition.org/rsa/4449radicalisationfrustrationdenied subjectivitymoral economypolitical commitment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Éric Marlière |
spellingShingle |
Éric Marlière Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques radicalisation frustration denied subjectivity moral economy political commitment |
author_facet |
Éric Marlière |
author_sort |
Éric Marlière |
title |
Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales |
title_short |
Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales |
title_full |
Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales |
title_fullStr |
Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales |
title_sort |
analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales |
publisher |
Université Catholique de Louvain |
series |
Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques |
issn |
1782-1592 2033-7485 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
This article’s objective consists in questioning the concepts used by researchers in the social sciences so as to understand radicalisation processes described as Islamic. If certain university disciplines like geopolitics or psychology propose global explanations on the subject of radicalisation, sociologists appear to be more reserved or, in any case, more moderate as to the analyses to bring to the phenomenon. For that matter, the very concept of radicalisation is provoking debate within the discipline. Indeed, the various approaches in sociology remain too compartmentalised to permit a consensual analysis of jihadism to emerge. Hence the task here is one of proposing an inventory of some of the concepts mobilized in the social sciences on urban revolts in order to take a step back from the overarching interpretations of the phenomenon. Thus the concepts exposed here may not only clarify certain aspects of this complex object in analysing the paths of jihadists more closely, but also demonstrate complementarity with a view to enriching our knowledge of a controversial phenomenon. |
topic |
radicalisation frustration denied subjectivity moral economy political commitment |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/rsa/4449 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ericmarliere analyserlephenomenecontroversederadicalisationdanslessciencessociales |
_version_ |
1721313272699813888 |