Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales

This article’s objective consists in questioning the concepts used by researchers in the social sciences so as to understand radicalisation processes described as Islamic. If certain university disciplines like geopolitics or psychology propose global explanations on the subject of radicalisation, s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Éric Marlière
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université Catholique de Louvain 2020-12-01
Series:Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/rsa/4449
id doaj-f8fa95ecedbd43e0b183b6bef4ef2c0f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f8fa95ecedbd43e0b183b6bef4ef2c0f2021-07-08T16:31:35ZengUniversité Catholique de LouvainRecherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques1782-15922033-74852020-12-0151216318110.4000/rsa.4449Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences socialesÉric MarlièreThis article’s objective consists in questioning the concepts used by researchers in the social sciences so as to understand radicalisation processes described as Islamic. If certain university disciplines like geopolitics or psychology propose global explanations on the subject of radicalisation, sociologists appear to be more reserved or, in any case, more moderate as to the analyses to bring to the phenomenon. For that matter, the very concept of radicalisation is provoking debate within the discipline. Indeed, the various approaches in sociology remain too compartmentalised to permit a consensual analysis of jihadism to emerge. Hence the task here is one of proposing an inventory of some of the concepts mobilized in the social sciences on urban revolts in order to take a step back from the overarching interpretations of the phenomenon. Thus the concepts expo­sed here may not only clarify certain aspects of this complex object in analysing the paths of jihadists more closely, but also demonstrate complementarity with a view to enriching our knowledge of a controversial phenomenon.http://journals.openedition.org/rsa/4449radicalisationfrustrationdenied subjectivitymoral economypolitical commitment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Éric Marlière
spellingShingle Éric Marlière
Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales
Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques
radicalisation
frustration
denied subjectivity
moral economy
political commitment
author_facet Éric Marlière
author_sort Éric Marlière
title Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales
title_short Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales
title_full Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales
title_fullStr Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales
title_full_unstemmed Analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales
title_sort analyser le phénomène controversé de “radicalisation” dans les sciences sociales
publisher Université Catholique de Louvain
series Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques
issn 1782-1592
2033-7485
publishDate 2020-12-01
description This article’s objective consists in questioning the concepts used by researchers in the social sciences so as to understand radicalisation processes described as Islamic. If certain university disciplines like geopolitics or psychology propose global explanations on the subject of radicalisation, sociologists appear to be more reserved or, in any case, more moderate as to the analyses to bring to the phenomenon. For that matter, the very concept of radicalisation is provoking debate within the discipline. Indeed, the various approaches in sociology remain too compartmentalised to permit a consensual analysis of jihadism to emerge. Hence the task here is one of proposing an inventory of some of the concepts mobilized in the social sciences on urban revolts in order to take a step back from the overarching interpretations of the phenomenon. Thus the concepts expo­sed here may not only clarify certain aspects of this complex object in analysing the paths of jihadists more closely, but also demonstrate complementarity with a view to enriching our knowledge of a controversial phenomenon.
topic radicalisation
frustration
denied subjectivity
moral economy
political commitment
url http://journals.openedition.org/rsa/4449
work_keys_str_mv AT ericmarliere analyserlephenomenecontroversederadicalisationdanslessciencessociales
_version_ 1721313272699813888