Does the Circular Economy Grow the Pie? The Case of Rebound Effects From Smartphone Reuse

The environmental benefits of the circular economy (CE) are often taken for granted. There are, however, reasons to believe that rebound effects may counteract such benefits by increasing overall consumption or “growing the pie.” In this study, we focus on two main rebound mechanisms: (1) imperfect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tamar Makov, David Font Vivanco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Energy Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00039/full
id doaj-f8e0c667bd5e41a1892cbc74fa40dc4d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f8e0c667bd5e41a1892cbc74fa40dc4d2020-11-24T22:01:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Energy Research2296-598X2018-05-01610.3389/fenrg.2018.00039368568Does the Circular Economy Grow the Pie? The Case of Rebound Effects From Smartphone ReuseTamar Makov0David Font Vivanco1School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United StatesUCL Institute for Sustainable Resources, University College London, London, United KingdomThe environmental benefits of the circular economy (CE) are often taken for granted. There are, however, reasons to believe that rebound effects may counteract such benefits by increasing overall consumption or “growing the pie.” In this study, we focus on two main rebound mechanisms: (1) imperfect substitution between “re-circulated” (recycled, reused, etc.) and new products and (2) re-spending due to economic savings. We use the case study of smartphone reuse in the US to quantify, for the first time, rebound effects from reuse. Using a combination of life cycle assessment, sales statistics, consumer surveying, consumer demand modeling, and environmentally-extended input-output analysis, we quantify the magnitude of this rebound effect for life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. We find a rebound effect of 29% on average, with a range of 27–46% for specific smartphone models. Moreover, when exploring how rebound might play out in other regions and under different consumer behavior patterns, we find that rebound effects could be higher than 100% (backfire effect). In other words, we estimate that about one third, and potentially the entirety, of emission savings resulting from smartphone reuse could be lost due to the rebound effect. Our results thus suggest that there are grounds to challenge the premise that CE strategies, and reuse in particular, always reduce environmental burdens.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00039/fullrebound effectcircular economyreusesmartphoneslife cycle assessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tamar Makov
David Font Vivanco
spellingShingle Tamar Makov
David Font Vivanco
Does the Circular Economy Grow the Pie? The Case of Rebound Effects From Smartphone Reuse
Frontiers in Energy Research
rebound effect
circular economy
reuse
smartphones
life cycle assessment
author_facet Tamar Makov
David Font Vivanco
author_sort Tamar Makov
title Does the Circular Economy Grow the Pie? The Case of Rebound Effects From Smartphone Reuse
title_short Does the Circular Economy Grow the Pie? The Case of Rebound Effects From Smartphone Reuse
title_full Does the Circular Economy Grow the Pie? The Case of Rebound Effects From Smartphone Reuse
title_fullStr Does the Circular Economy Grow the Pie? The Case of Rebound Effects From Smartphone Reuse
title_full_unstemmed Does the Circular Economy Grow the Pie? The Case of Rebound Effects From Smartphone Reuse
title_sort does the circular economy grow the pie? the case of rebound effects from smartphone reuse
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Energy Research
issn 2296-598X
publishDate 2018-05-01
description The environmental benefits of the circular economy (CE) are often taken for granted. There are, however, reasons to believe that rebound effects may counteract such benefits by increasing overall consumption or “growing the pie.” In this study, we focus on two main rebound mechanisms: (1) imperfect substitution between “re-circulated” (recycled, reused, etc.) and new products and (2) re-spending due to economic savings. We use the case study of smartphone reuse in the US to quantify, for the first time, rebound effects from reuse. Using a combination of life cycle assessment, sales statistics, consumer surveying, consumer demand modeling, and environmentally-extended input-output analysis, we quantify the magnitude of this rebound effect for life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. We find a rebound effect of 29% on average, with a range of 27–46% for specific smartphone models. Moreover, when exploring how rebound might play out in other regions and under different consumer behavior patterns, we find that rebound effects could be higher than 100% (backfire effect). In other words, we estimate that about one third, and potentially the entirety, of emission savings resulting from smartphone reuse could be lost due to the rebound effect. Our results thus suggest that there are grounds to challenge the premise that CE strategies, and reuse in particular, always reduce environmental burdens.
topic rebound effect
circular economy
reuse
smartphones
life cycle assessment
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00039/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tamarmakov doesthecirculareconomygrowthepiethecaseofreboundeffectsfromsmartphonereuse
AT davidfontvivanco doesthecirculareconomygrowthepiethecaseofreboundeffectsfromsmartphonereuse
_version_ 1725839077896355840