Qualitative factors shaping MS patients’ experiences of infusible disease-modifying drugs: a critical incident technique analysis

Objective To explore factors shaping the experiences of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with infusible disease-modifying drugs in a hospital setting.Design and settings The critical incident technique served as a framework for collecting and analysing patients’ qualitative accou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helle Hvilsted Nielsen, Jakob Schäfer, Janni Lisander Larsen, Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/8/e037701.full
id doaj-f8df4cc343d54649bedb691d148e1965
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f8df4cc343d54649bedb691d148e19652021-05-28T12:31:34ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-08-0110810.1136/bmjopen-2020-037701Qualitative factors shaping MS patients’ experiences of infusible disease-modifying drugs: a critical incident technique analysisHelle Hvilsted Nielsen0Jakob Schäfer1Janni Lisander Larsen2Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen3Department of Neurobiology Research, Odense University Hospital, Odense, DenmarkDepartment of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, DenmarkResearch Department, PharmaRelations Aps, Virum, DenmarkDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Aarhus, DenmarkObjective To explore factors shaping the experiences of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with infusible disease-modifying drugs in a hospital setting.Design and settings The critical incident technique served as a framework for collecting and analysing patients’ qualitative account practices involving infusible disease-modifying drugs. Data were collected through semistructured interviews and one single-case study. Participants were recruited from all five regions in Denmark. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify and interpret factors shaping patients’ infusion journey over time.Participants Twenty-two patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis receiving infusion with disease-modifying drugs (natalizumab, alemtuzumab and ocrelizumab).Results Four time scenarios—preinfusion, day of infusion, long-term infusion and switch of infusion—associated with the infusion of disease-modifying drugs were analysed to reveal how different factors could both positively and negatively affect patient experience. Time taken to make the treatment decision was affected by participants’ subjective perceptions of their disease activity; this may have set off a treatment dilemma in the event of a pressing need for treatment. Planning and routine made infusion practices manageable, but external and internal surroundings, including infusion room ambience and the quality of relationships with healthcare professionals and fellow patients, affected patients’ cognitive state and well-being irrespective of the infusion regimen. Switching the infusion regimen can reactivate worries akin to the preinfusion scenario.Conclusion This study provides novel insight into the positive and negative factors that shape patients’ experience of infusion care practices. From a patient’s perspective, an infusion practice is not a solitary event in time but includes planning and routine which become an integral part of their multiple sclerosis management. The quality of space and the ambience of the infusion room, combined with the relationship with healthcare professionals and fellow patients, can be a significant source of knowledge and support people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in their experience of agency in life.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/8/e037701.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Helle Hvilsted Nielsen
Jakob Schäfer
Janni Lisander Larsen
Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen
spellingShingle Helle Hvilsted Nielsen
Jakob Schäfer
Janni Lisander Larsen
Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen
Qualitative factors shaping MS patients’ experiences of infusible disease-modifying drugs: a critical incident technique analysis
BMJ Open
author_facet Helle Hvilsted Nielsen
Jakob Schäfer
Janni Lisander Larsen
Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen
author_sort Helle Hvilsted Nielsen
title Qualitative factors shaping MS patients’ experiences of infusible disease-modifying drugs: a critical incident technique analysis
title_short Qualitative factors shaping MS patients’ experiences of infusible disease-modifying drugs: a critical incident technique analysis
title_full Qualitative factors shaping MS patients’ experiences of infusible disease-modifying drugs: a critical incident technique analysis
title_fullStr Qualitative factors shaping MS patients’ experiences of infusible disease-modifying drugs: a critical incident technique analysis
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative factors shaping MS patients’ experiences of infusible disease-modifying drugs: a critical incident technique analysis
title_sort qualitative factors shaping ms patients’ experiences of infusible disease-modifying drugs: a critical incident technique analysis
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Objective To explore factors shaping the experiences of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with infusible disease-modifying drugs in a hospital setting.Design and settings The critical incident technique served as a framework for collecting and analysing patients’ qualitative account practices involving infusible disease-modifying drugs. Data were collected through semistructured interviews and one single-case study. Participants were recruited from all five regions in Denmark. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify and interpret factors shaping patients’ infusion journey over time.Participants Twenty-two patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis receiving infusion with disease-modifying drugs (natalizumab, alemtuzumab and ocrelizumab).Results Four time scenarios—preinfusion, day of infusion, long-term infusion and switch of infusion—associated with the infusion of disease-modifying drugs were analysed to reveal how different factors could both positively and negatively affect patient experience. Time taken to make the treatment decision was affected by participants’ subjective perceptions of their disease activity; this may have set off a treatment dilemma in the event of a pressing need for treatment. Planning and routine made infusion practices manageable, but external and internal surroundings, including infusion room ambience and the quality of relationships with healthcare professionals and fellow patients, affected patients’ cognitive state and well-being irrespective of the infusion regimen. Switching the infusion regimen can reactivate worries akin to the preinfusion scenario.Conclusion This study provides novel insight into the positive and negative factors that shape patients’ experience of infusion care practices. From a patient’s perspective, an infusion practice is not a solitary event in time but includes planning and routine which become an integral part of their multiple sclerosis management. The quality of space and the ambience of the infusion room, combined with the relationship with healthcare professionals and fellow patients, can be a significant source of knowledge and support people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in their experience of agency in life.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/8/e037701.full
work_keys_str_mv AT hellehvilstednielsen qualitativefactorsshapingmspatientsexperiencesofinfusiblediseasemodifyingdrugsacriticalincidenttechniqueanalysis
AT jakobschafer qualitativefactorsshapingmspatientsexperiencesofinfusiblediseasemodifyingdrugsacriticalincidenttechniqueanalysis
AT jannilisanderlarsen qualitativefactorsshapingmspatientsexperiencesofinfusiblediseasemodifyingdrugsacriticalincidenttechniqueanalysis
AT petervestergaardrasmussen qualitativefactorsshapingmspatientsexperiencesofinfusiblediseasemodifyingdrugsacriticalincidenttechniqueanalysis
_version_ 1721424176735059968