Comparison of Oxidative Status of Human Milk, Human Milk Fortifiers and Preterm Infant Formulas

• Main Authors: Luisa Pozzo, Simona Cirrincione, Rossella Russo, Magdalena Karamać, Ryszard Amarowicz, Alessandra Coscia, Sara Antoniazzi, Laura Cavallarin, Marzia Giribaldi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2019-10-01
• Series: Foods
• Subjects: donkey milk; human milk; infant formulas; protein fortifiers; malondialdehyde; teac
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/8/10/458

Preterm and low birth weight infants require specific nutrition to overcome the accumulated growth deficit, and to prevent morbidities related to postnatal growth failure. In order to guarantee an adequate nutrient-intake, mother&#8217;s own milk, when available, or donor human milk, are usually fortified with additional nutrients, in particular proteins. Fortification with processed ingredients may result in additional intake in oxidative compounds, deriving from extensive heat treatments, that are applied during processing. The aim of the present work was to compare the in vitro antioxidant activity and oxidative compound content conveyed by different preterm infant foods and fortifiers, namely raw and pasteurized human milk, two different preterm infant formulas, three bovine milk-based fortifiers and two experimental donkey milk-based fortifiers. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses revealed significant differences between the different products. The use of human milk minimizes the intake of dietary oxidative compound in comparison to infant formulas, irrespective of pasteurization or fortification, especially as far as malondialdehyde content is concerned. The addition of fortifiers to human milk increases its antioxidant capacity, and the choice of the protein source (hydrolysed <i>vs.</i> whole proteins) differently impacted the resulting total antioxidant capacity of the diet.