Reconstructing the dynamics of the highly similar May 2016 and June 2019 Iliamna Volcano (Alaska) ice–rock avalanches from seismoacoustic data

<p>Surficial mass wasting events are a hazard worldwide. Seismic and acoustic signals from these often remote processes, combined with other geophysical observations, can provide key information for monitoring and rapid response efforts and enhance our understanding of event dynamics. Here, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Toney, D. Fee, K. E. Allstadt, M. M. Haney, R. S. Matoza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2021-04-01
Series:Earth Surface Dynamics
Online Access:https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/9/271/2021/esurf-9-271-2021.pdf
id doaj-f8be81338dca448a8cf8f24bdc9c4436
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f8be81338dca448a8cf8f24bdc9c44362021-04-08T09:23:19ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth Surface Dynamics2196-63112196-632X2021-04-01927129310.5194/esurf-9-271-2021Reconstructing the dynamics of the highly similar May 2016 and June 2019 Iliamna Volcano (Alaska) ice–rock avalanches from seismoacoustic dataL. Toney0L. Toney1D. Fee2K. E. Allstadt3M. M. Haney4R. S. Matoza5Alaska Volcano Observatory and Wilson Alaska Technical Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USAU.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, CO, USAAlaska Volcano Observatory and Wilson Alaska Technical Center, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USAU.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, CO, USAU.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Volcano Observatory, Anchorage, AK, USADepartment of Earth Science and Earth Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA<p>Surficial mass wasting events are a hazard worldwide. Seismic and acoustic signals from these often remote processes, combined with other geophysical observations, can provide key information for monitoring and rapid response efforts and enhance our understanding of event dynamics. Here, we present seismoacoustic data and analyses for two very large ice–rock avalanches occurring on Iliamna Volcano, Alaska (USA), on 22 May 2016 and 21 June 2019. Iliamna is a glacier-mantled stratovolcano located in the Cook Inlet, <span class="inline-formula">∼200</span> km from Anchorage, Alaska. The volcano experiences massive, quasi-annual slope failures due to glacial instabilities and hydrothermal alteration of volcanic rocks near its summit. The May 2016 and June 2019 avalanches were particularly large and generated energetic seismic and infrasound signals which were recorded at numerous stations at ranges from <span class="inline-formula">∼9</span> to over 600 km. Both avalanches initiated in the same location near the head of Iliamna's east-facing Red Glacier, and their <span class="inline-formula">∼8</span> km long runout shapes are nearly identical. This repeatability – which is rare for large and rapid mass movements – provides an excellent opportunity for comparison and validation of seismoacoustic source characteristics. For both events, we invert long-period (15–80 s) seismic signals to obtain a force-time representation of the source. We model the avalanche as a sliding block which exerts a spatially static point force on the Earth. We use this force-time function to derive constraints on avalanche acceleration, velocity, and directionality, which are compatible with satellite imagery and observed terrain features. Our inversion results suggest that the avalanches reached speeds exceeding 70 m s<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>, consistent with numerical modeling from previous Iliamna studies. We lack sufficient local infrasound data to test an acoustic source model for these processes. However, the acoustic data suggest that infrasound from these avalanches is produced after the mass movement regime transitions from cohesive block-type failure to granular and turbulent flow – little to no infrasound is generated by the initial failure. At Iliamna, synthesis of advanced numerical flow models and more detailed ground observations combined with increased geophysical station coverage could yield significant gains in our understanding of these events.</p>https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/9/271/2021/esurf-9-271-2021.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L. Toney
L. Toney
D. Fee
K. E. Allstadt
M. M. Haney
R. S. Matoza
spellingShingle L. Toney
L. Toney
D. Fee
K. E. Allstadt
M. M. Haney
R. S. Matoza
Reconstructing the dynamics of the highly similar May 2016 and June 2019 Iliamna Volcano (Alaska) ice–rock avalanches from seismoacoustic data
Earth Surface Dynamics
author_facet L. Toney
L. Toney
D. Fee
K. E. Allstadt
M. M. Haney
R. S. Matoza
author_sort L. Toney
title Reconstructing the dynamics of the highly similar May 2016 and June 2019 Iliamna Volcano (Alaska) ice–rock avalanches from seismoacoustic data
title_short Reconstructing the dynamics of the highly similar May 2016 and June 2019 Iliamna Volcano (Alaska) ice–rock avalanches from seismoacoustic data
title_full Reconstructing the dynamics of the highly similar May 2016 and June 2019 Iliamna Volcano (Alaska) ice–rock avalanches from seismoacoustic data
title_fullStr Reconstructing the dynamics of the highly similar May 2016 and June 2019 Iliamna Volcano (Alaska) ice–rock avalanches from seismoacoustic data
title_full_unstemmed Reconstructing the dynamics of the highly similar May 2016 and June 2019 Iliamna Volcano (Alaska) ice–rock avalanches from seismoacoustic data
title_sort reconstructing the dynamics of the highly similar may 2016 and june 2019 iliamna volcano (alaska) ice–rock avalanches from seismoacoustic data
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Earth Surface Dynamics
issn 2196-6311
2196-632X
publishDate 2021-04-01
description <p>Surficial mass wasting events are a hazard worldwide. Seismic and acoustic signals from these often remote processes, combined with other geophysical observations, can provide key information for monitoring and rapid response efforts and enhance our understanding of event dynamics. Here, we present seismoacoustic data and analyses for two very large ice–rock avalanches occurring on Iliamna Volcano, Alaska (USA), on 22 May 2016 and 21 June 2019. Iliamna is a glacier-mantled stratovolcano located in the Cook Inlet, <span class="inline-formula">∼200</span> km from Anchorage, Alaska. The volcano experiences massive, quasi-annual slope failures due to glacial instabilities and hydrothermal alteration of volcanic rocks near its summit. The May 2016 and June 2019 avalanches were particularly large and generated energetic seismic and infrasound signals which were recorded at numerous stations at ranges from <span class="inline-formula">∼9</span> to over 600 km. Both avalanches initiated in the same location near the head of Iliamna's east-facing Red Glacier, and their <span class="inline-formula">∼8</span> km long runout shapes are nearly identical. This repeatability – which is rare for large and rapid mass movements – provides an excellent opportunity for comparison and validation of seismoacoustic source characteristics. For both events, we invert long-period (15–80 s) seismic signals to obtain a force-time representation of the source. We model the avalanche as a sliding block which exerts a spatially static point force on the Earth. We use this force-time function to derive constraints on avalanche acceleration, velocity, and directionality, which are compatible with satellite imagery and observed terrain features. Our inversion results suggest that the avalanches reached speeds exceeding 70 m s<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>, consistent with numerical modeling from previous Iliamna studies. We lack sufficient local infrasound data to test an acoustic source model for these processes. However, the acoustic data suggest that infrasound from these avalanches is produced after the mass movement regime transitions from cohesive block-type failure to granular and turbulent flow – little to no infrasound is generated by the initial failure. At Iliamna, synthesis of advanced numerical flow models and more detailed ground observations combined with increased geophysical station coverage could yield significant gains in our understanding of these events.</p>
url https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/9/271/2021/esurf-9-271-2021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ltoney reconstructingthedynamicsofthehighlysimilarmay2016andjune2019iliamnavolcanoalaskaicerockavalanchesfromseismoacousticdata
AT ltoney reconstructingthedynamicsofthehighlysimilarmay2016andjune2019iliamnavolcanoalaskaicerockavalanchesfromseismoacousticdata
AT dfee reconstructingthedynamicsofthehighlysimilarmay2016andjune2019iliamnavolcanoalaskaicerockavalanchesfromseismoacousticdata
AT keallstadt reconstructingthedynamicsofthehighlysimilarmay2016andjune2019iliamnavolcanoalaskaicerockavalanchesfromseismoacousticdata
AT mmhaney reconstructingthedynamicsofthehighlysimilarmay2016andjune2019iliamnavolcanoalaskaicerockavalanchesfromseismoacousticdata
AT rsmatoza reconstructingthedynamicsofthehighlysimilarmay2016andjune2019iliamnavolcanoalaskaicerockavalanchesfromseismoacousticdata
_version_ 1721535234384592896