Cultural Concern under Trade and Investment Agreements: Does it Really Work?

There has been a concern over the adverse influence of globalisation on local culture. Trade and investment agreements have included cultural concern in their provisions.  Employing these provisions, countries initiated trade and investment-related measures to secure what they have presumed as cultu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Brawijaya University 2018-10-01
Series:Brawijaya Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://lawjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/law/article/view/145
id doaj-f8ba86700edb4eb491b1eefb49ff0d6f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f8ba86700edb4eb491b1eefb49ff0d6f2020-11-24T21:24:30ZengBrawijaya UniversityBrawijaya Law Journal2356-45122503-08412018-10-015217318810.21776/ub.blj.2018.005.02.0256Cultural Concern under Trade and Investment Agreements: Does it Really Work?I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja0Faculty of Law Udayana UniversityThere has been a concern over the adverse influence of globalisation on local culture. Trade and investment agreements have included cultural concern in their provisions.  Employing these provisions, countries initiated trade and investment-related measures to secure what they have presumed as cultural traditions and values. This article seeks to examine if the incorporation of cultural concern under trade and investment agreement is effective to reconcile the need for securing culture and the spirit of free trade and free flows of investment. This article is normative research, examining the existing cultural concern under trade and investment agreements, cultural-related measures of particular countries, and how the judicial bodies have responded these measures in their decisions. This article argues that the incorporation of cultural concern has triggered a wide range of cultural-related measures. Nevertheless, the decision of judicial bodies, to some extent, has been effective to shield the purpose of cultural concern, especially to avoid disguise or inefficient protectionism, and to admit the right of countries to protect or promote their cultural traditions and values.https://lawjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/law/article/view/145cultural concerntrade agreementsinvestment agreements
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
spellingShingle I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
Cultural Concern under Trade and Investment Agreements: Does it Really Work?
Brawijaya Law Journal
cultural concern
trade agreements
investment agreements
author_facet I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
author_sort I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja
title Cultural Concern under Trade and Investment Agreements: Does it Really Work?
title_short Cultural Concern under Trade and Investment Agreements: Does it Really Work?
title_full Cultural Concern under Trade and Investment Agreements: Does it Really Work?
title_fullStr Cultural Concern under Trade and Investment Agreements: Does it Really Work?
title_full_unstemmed Cultural Concern under Trade and Investment Agreements: Does it Really Work?
title_sort cultural concern under trade and investment agreements: does it really work?
publisher Brawijaya University
series Brawijaya Law Journal
issn 2356-4512
2503-0841
publishDate 2018-10-01
description There has been a concern over the adverse influence of globalisation on local culture. Trade and investment agreements have included cultural concern in their provisions.  Employing these provisions, countries initiated trade and investment-related measures to secure what they have presumed as cultural traditions and values. This article seeks to examine if the incorporation of cultural concern under trade and investment agreement is effective to reconcile the need for securing culture and the spirit of free trade and free flows of investment. This article is normative research, examining the existing cultural concern under trade and investment agreements, cultural-related measures of particular countries, and how the judicial bodies have responded these measures in their decisions. This article argues that the incorporation of cultural concern has triggered a wide range of cultural-related measures. Nevertheless, the decision of judicial bodies, to some extent, has been effective to shield the purpose of cultural concern, especially to avoid disguise or inefficient protectionism, and to admit the right of countries to protect or promote their cultural traditions and values.
topic cultural concern
trade agreements
investment agreements
url https://lawjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/law/article/view/145
work_keys_str_mv AT igustingurahparikesitwidiatedja culturalconcernundertradeandinvestmentagreementsdoesitreallywork
_version_ 1725987778910486528