Costi sanitari di un programma vaccinale: analisi di minimizzazione dei costi

The global cost of a vaccination program is made up by many more cost components than the acquisition expense, although the former is the first cost usually taken into consideration when comparing two or more alternatives. The present article analyses the economical impact consequent to the use of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. L. Colombo, A. Muzio, R. Giordani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SEEd Medical Publishers 2003-03-01
Series:Farmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways
Online Access:https://journals.seedmedicalpublishers.com/index.php/FE/article/view/763
id doaj-f8a0a2c4a2da47c0a94e49c67759f2e9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f8a0a2c4a2da47c0a94e49c67759f2e92020-11-25T01:57:43ZengSEEd Medical PublishersFarmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways2240-256X2003-03-0141253210.7175/fe.v4i1.763709Costi sanitari di un programma vaccinale: analisi di minimizzazione dei costiG. L. Colombo0A. Muzio1R. Giordani2S.A.V.E. Studi Analisi Valutazioni Economiche, Milano
S.A.V.E. Studi Analisi Valutazioni Economiche, Milano
Azienda USL Bologna Sud

The global cost of a vaccination program is made up by many more cost components than the acquisition expense, although the former is the first cost usually taken into consideration when comparing two or more alternatives. The present article analyses the economical impact consequent to the use of two different hexavalent vaccine formulations (Hexavac, liquid ready for injection, and Infanrix Hexa, dry, to be re-hydrated) available on the Italian market for the mandatory vaccination of newborns during their first year of life. The cost minimization analysis was conducted considering only differential costs, i.e. those costs than can differ with the use of one of the two products, and not those common to the two competing products, such as acquisition cost (33 euro in average for both), the costs for the organization, the call of the infants to be vaccinated, etc.. The differences among the considered alternatives detected by this study regard the work for the preparation and administration of the vaccines, the quantity of special waste they produce and the incidence of serious febrile reactions leading to pharmacological treatment and physician consultation (body temperature > 40°C). The liquid formulation resulted more convenient in terms of cost for nurse work (0,63 euro saved per patient), waste disposal, and adverse reactions management. The robustness of these results was confirmed by sensitivity analysis and an estimate of the global saving for the Italian health system associated with the universal utilization of the liquid formulation is furnished.https://journals.seedmedicalpublishers.com/index.php/FE/article/view/763
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G. L. Colombo
A. Muzio
R. Giordani
spellingShingle G. L. Colombo
A. Muzio
R. Giordani
Costi sanitari di un programma vaccinale: analisi di minimizzazione dei costi
Farmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways
author_facet G. L. Colombo
A. Muzio
R. Giordani
author_sort G. L. Colombo
title Costi sanitari di un programma vaccinale: analisi di minimizzazione dei costi
title_short Costi sanitari di un programma vaccinale: analisi di minimizzazione dei costi
title_full Costi sanitari di un programma vaccinale: analisi di minimizzazione dei costi
title_fullStr Costi sanitari di un programma vaccinale: analisi di minimizzazione dei costi
title_full_unstemmed Costi sanitari di un programma vaccinale: analisi di minimizzazione dei costi
title_sort costi sanitari di un programma vaccinale: analisi di minimizzazione dei costi
publisher SEEd Medical Publishers
series Farmeconomia: Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways
issn 2240-256X
publishDate 2003-03-01
description The global cost of a vaccination program is made up by many more cost components than the acquisition expense, although the former is the first cost usually taken into consideration when comparing two or more alternatives. The present article analyses the economical impact consequent to the use of two different hexavalent vaccine formulations (Hexavac, liquid ready for injection, and Infanrix Hexa, dry, to be re-hydrated) available on the Italian market for the mandatory vaccination of newborns during their first year of life. The cost minimization analysis was conducted considering only differential costs, i.e. those costs than can differ with the use of one of the two products, and not those common to the two competing products, such as acquisition cost (33 euro in average for both), the costs for the organization, the call of the infants to be vaccinated, etc.. The differences among the considered alternatives detected by this study regard the work for the preparation and administration of the vaccines, the quantity of special waste they produce and the incidence of serious febrile reactions leading to pharmacological treatment and physician consultation (body temperature > 40°C). The liquid formulation resulted more convenient in terms of cost for nurse work (0,63 euro saved per patient), waste disposal, and adverse reactions management. The robustness of these results was confirmed by sensitivity analysis and an estimate of the global saving for the Italian health system associated with the universal utilization of the liquid formulation is furnished.
url https://journals.seedmedicalpublishers.com/index.php/FE/article/view/763
work_keys_str_mv AT glcolombo costisanitaridiunprogrammavaccinaleanalisidiminimizzazionedeicosti
AT amuzio costisanitaridiunprogrammavaccinaleanalisidiminimizzazionedeicosti
AT rgiordani costisanitaridiunprogrammavaccinaleanalisidiminimizzazionedeicosti
_version_ 1724972954880573440