Corporate Governance and Operational Risk: Empirical Evidence

<p>The aim of this paper is to study the effect of governance mechanisms on the operational risk management of banks. A total of 1176 operational loss events recorded in 14 banks during the period 2006-2013 are analyzed to study the relation between the operational loss events and seven indica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariem Nsaibi, Ilyes Abidi, Mouhammed Tahar Rajhi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EconJournals 2020-07-01
Series:International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues
Online Access:https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/9861
id doaj-f899989356e946a49aa1432fceb67337
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f899989356e946a49aa1432fceb673372020-11-25T03:25:52ZengEconJournalsInternational Journal of Economics and Financial Issues2146-41382020-07-011041071154664Corporate Governance and Operational Risk: Empirical EvidenceMariem Nsaibi0Ilyes Abidi1Mouhammed Tahar Rajhi2University of Hail, Saudi ArabiaUniversity of Tunis El Manar, TunisiaUniversity of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia<p>The aim of this paper is to study the effect of governance mechanisms on the operational risk management of banks. A total of 1176 operational loss events recorded in 14 banks during the period 2006-2013 are analyzed to study the relation between the operational loss events and seven indicators of governance: the board size, the proportion of foreign administrators, the proportion of a government representative on the board, the proportion of institutional directors, the proportion of independent directors, the rotation of the director and the internal rating of the bank. The results show that only six governance mechanisms have significant effects on operational risk management. The size of the board of directors, the presence of independent directors, the presence of institutional directors, the presence of a state representative, the presence of foreign directors on the board of directors are  positively and  statistically significant with the severity operational losses. The results also state that the internal rating variable is negatively and statistically significant with the severity operational losses.  But, the turnover hasn’t any impact on the operational risk management.</p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>operational risk, operational loss events, corporate governance, Basel III</p><p><strong>JEL Classifications: </strong>G28, G34, G38</p><p>DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.9861">https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.9861</a></p>https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/9861
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariem Nsaibi
Ilyes Abidi
Mouhammed Tahar Rajhi
spellingShingle Mariem Nsaibi
Ilyes Abidi
Mouhammed Tahar Rajhi
Corporate Governance and Operational Risk: Empirical Evidence
International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues
author_facet Mariem Nsaibi
Ilyes Abidi
Mouhammed Tahar Rajhi
author_sort Mariem Nsaibi
title Corporate Governance and Operational Risk: Empirical Evidence
title_short Corporate Governance and Operational Risk: Empirical Evidence
title_full Corporate Governance and Operational Risk: Empirical Evidence
title_fullStr Corporate Governance and Operational Risk: Empirical Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Corporate Governance and Operational Risk: Empirical Evidence
title_sort corporate governance and operational risk: empirical evidence
publisher EconJournals
series International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues
issn 2146-4138
publishDate 2020-07-01
description <p>The aim of this paper is to study the effect of governance mechanisms on the operational risk management of banks. A total of 1176 operational loss events recorded in 14 banks during the period 2006-2013 are analyzed to study the relation between the operational loss events and seven indicators of governance: the board size, the proportion of foreign administrators, the proportion of a government representative on the board, the proportion of institutional directors, the proportion of independent directors, the rotation of the director and the internal rating of the bank. The results show that only six governance mechanisms have significant effects on operational risk management. The size of the board of directors, the presence of independent directors, the presence of institutional directors, the presence of a state representative, the presence of foreign directors on the board of directors are  positively and  statistically significant with the severity operational losses. The results also state that the internal rating variable is negatively and statistically significant with the severity operational losses.  But, the turnover hasn’t any impact on the operational risk management.</p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>operational risk, operational loss events, corporate governance, Basel III</p><p><strong>JEL Classifications: </strong>G28, G34, G38</p><p>DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.9861">https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.9861</a></p>
url https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/9861
work_keys_str_mv AT mariemnsaibi corporategovernanceandoperationalriskempiricalevidence
AT ilyesabidi corporategovernanceandoperationalriskempiricalevidence
AT mouhammedtaharrajhi corporategovernanceandoperationalriskempiricalevidence
_version_ 1724595162468843520