Evaluation of Different Feeds for Their Potential to Generate Methane and Change Methanogen Diversity

Optimization of the dietary formulation is the most effective way to reduce methane. Nineteen feed ingredients (brans, vegetable proteins, and grains) were evaluated for their potential to generate methane and change methanogen diversity using an in vitro ruminal fermentation technique. Feed formula...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seon-Ho Kim, Lovelia L. Mamuad, Chang-Dae Jeong, Yeon-Jae Choi, Sung Sill Lee, Jong-Youl Ko, Sang-Suk Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies 2013-12-01
Series:Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ajas.info/upload/pdf/ajas-26-12-1698-6.pdf
id doaj-f8960ad0cc3840a492f3e4dbef705e77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f8960ad0cc3840a492f3e4dbef705e772020-11-25T00:29:56ZengAsian-Australasian Association of Animal Production SocietiesAsian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences1011-23671976-55172013-12-0126121698170710.5713/ajas.2013.132604620Evaluation of Different Feeds for Their Potential to Generate Methane and Change Methanogen DiversitySeon-Ho KimLovelia L. MamuadChang-Dae JeongYeon-Jae ChoiSung Sill LeeJong-Youl KoSang-Suk LeeOptimization of the dietary formulation is the most effective way to reduce methane. Nineteen feed ingredients (brans, vegetable proteins, and grains) were evaluated for their potential to generate methane and change methanogen diversity using an in vitro ruminal fermentation technique. Feed formulations categorized into high, medium and low production based on methane production of each ingredient were then subjected to in vitro fermentation to determine the real methane production and their effects on digestibility. Methanogen diversity among low, medium and high-methane producing groups was analyzed by PCR-DGGE. The highest methane production was observed in Korean wheat bran, soybean and perilla meals, and wheat and maize of brans, vegetable protein and cereal groups, respectively. On the other hand, corn bran, cotton seed meal and barley led to the lowest production in the same groups. Nine bacteria and 18 methanogen 16s rDNA PCR-DGGE dominant bands were identified with 83% to 99% and 92% to 100% similarity, respectively. Overall, the results of this study showed that methane emissions from ruminants can be mitigated through proper selection of feed ingredients to be used in the formulation of diets.http://www.ajas.info/upload/pdf/ajas-26-12-1698-6.pdfFeeds EvaluationMethanogen DiversityMethane ProductionRuminal Fermentation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Seon-Ho Kim
Lovelia L. Mamuad
Chang-Dae Jeong
Yeon-Jae Choi
Sung Sill Lee
Jong-Youl Ko
Sang-Suk Lee
spellingShingle Seon-Ho Kim
Lovelia L. Mamuad
Chang-Dae Jeong
Yeon-Jae Choi
Sung Sill Lee
Jong-Youl Ko
Sang-Suk Lee
Evaluation of Different Feeds for Their Potential to Generate Methane and Change Methanogen Diversity
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Feeds Evaluation
Methanogen Diversity
Methane Production
Ruminal Fermentation
author_facet Seon-Ho Kim
Lovelia L. Mamuad
Chang-Dae Jeong
Yeon-Jae Choi
Sung Sill Lee
Jong-Youl Ko
Sang-Suk Lee
author_sort Seon-Ho Kim
title Evaluation of Different Feeds for Their Potential to Generate Methane and Change Methanogen Diversity
title_short Evaluation of Different Feeds for Their Potential to Generate Methane and Change Methanogen Diversity
title_full Evaluation of Different Feeds for Their Potential to Generate Methane and Change Methanogen Diversity
title_fullStr Evaluation of Different Feeds for Their Potential to Generate Methane and Change Methanogen Diversity
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Different Feeds for Their Potential to Generate Methane and Change Methanogen Diversity
title_sort evaluation of different feeds for their potential to generate methane and change methanogen diversity
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
series Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
issn 1011-2367
1976-5517
publishDate 2013-12-01
description Optimization of the dietary formulation is the most effective way to reduce methane. Nineteen feed ingredients (brans, vegetable proteins, and grains) were evaluated for their potential to generate methane and change methanogen diversity using an in vitro ruminal fermentation technique. Feed formulations categorized into high, medium and low production based on methane production of each ingredient were then subjected to in vitro fermentation to determine the real methane production and their effects on digestibility. Methanogen diversity among low, medium and high-methane producing groups was analyzed by PCR-DGGE. The highest methane production was observed in Korean wheat bran, soybean and perilla meals, and wheat and maize of brans, vegetable protein and cereal groups, respectively. On the other hand, corn bran, cotton seed meal and barley led to the lowest production in the same groups. Nine bacteria and 18 methanogen 16s rDNA PCR-DGGE dominant bands were identified with 83% to 99% and 92% to 100% similarity, respectively. Overall, the results of this study showed that methane emissions from ruminants can be mitigated through proper selection of feed ingredients to be used in the formulation of diets.
topic Feeds Evaluation
Methanogen Diversity
Methane Production
Ruminal Fermentation
url http://www.ajas.info/upload/pdf/ajas-26-12-1698-6.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT seonhokim evaluationofdifferentfeedsfortheirpotentialtogeneratemethaneandchangemethanogendiversity
AT lovelialmamuad evaluationofdifferentfeedsfortheirpotentialtogeneratemethaneandchangemethanogendiversity
AT changdaejeong evaluationofdifferentfeedsfortheirpotentialtogeneratemethaneandchangemethanogendiversity
AT yeonjaechoi evaluationofdifferentfeedsfortheirpotentialtogeneratemethaneandchangemethanogendiversity
AT sungsilllee evaluationofdifferentfeedsfortheirpotentialtogeneratemethaneandchangemethanogendiversity
AT jongyoulko evaluationofdifferentfeedsfortheirpotentialtogeneratemethaneandchangemethanogendiversity
AT sangsuklee evaluationofdifferentfeedsfortheirpotentialtogeneratemethaneandchangemethanogendiversity
_version_ 1725328852984528896