Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Various antigen-specific immunoassays are available for the serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases. However, a spectrum of different tissue-based and monovalent antigen-specific assays is required to establish the diagn...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-08-01
|
Series: | Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases |
Online Access: | http://www.ojrd.com/content/7/1/49 |
id |
doaj-f8955826bc824e1195f88b4d628009af |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f8955826bc824e1195f88b4d628009af2020-11-24T21:36:19ZengBMCOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases1750-11722012-08-01714910.1186/1750-1172-7-49Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategyvan Beek NinaRentzsch KristinProbst ChristianKomorowski LarsKasperkiewicz MichaelFechner KaiBloecker Inga MZillikens DetlefStöcker WinfriedSchmidt Enno<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Various antigen-specific immunoassays are available for the serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases. However, a spectrum of different tissue-based and monovalent antigen-specific assays is required to establish the diagnosis. BIOCHIP mosaics consisting of different antigen substrates allow polyvalent immunofluorescence (IF) tests and provide antibody profiles in a single incubation.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Slides for indirect IF were prepared, containing BIOCHIPS with the following test substrates in each reaction field: monkey esophagus, primate salt-split skin, antigen dots of tetrameric BP180-NC16A as well as desmoglein 1-, desmoglein 3-, and BP230gC-expressing human HEK293 cells. This BIOCHIP mosaic was probed using a large panel of sera from patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV, n = 65), pemphigus foliaceus (PF, n = 50), bullous pemphigoid (BP, n = 42), and non-inflammatory skin diseases (n = 97) as well as from healthy blood donors (n = 100). Furthermore, to evaluate the usability in routine diagnostics, 454 consecutive sera from patients with suspected immunobullous disorders were prospectively analyzed in parallel using a) the IF BIOCHIP mosaic and b) a panel of single antibody assays as commonly used by specialized centers.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Using the BIOCHIP mosaic, sensitivities of the desmoglein 1-, desmoglein 3-, and NC16A-specific substrates were 90%, 98.5% and 100%, respectively. BP230 was recognized by 54% of the BP sera. Specificities ranged from 98.2% to 100% for all substrates. In the prospective study, a high agreement was found between the results obtained by the BIOCHIP mosaic and the single test panel for the diagnosis of BP, PV, PF, and sera without serum autoantibodies (Cohen’s κ between 0.88 and 0.97).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The BIOCHIP mosaic contains sensitive and specific substrates for the indirect IF diagnosis of BP, PF, and PV. Its diagnostic accuracy is comparable with the conventional multi-step approach. The highly standardized and practical BIOCHIP mosaic will facilitate the serological diagnosis of autoimmune blistering diseases.</p> http://www.ojrd.com/content/7/1/49 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
van Beek Nina Rentzsch Kristin Probst Christian Komorowski Lars Kasperkiewicz Michael Fechner Kai Bloecker Inga M Zillikens Detlef Stöcker Winfried Schmidt Enno |
spellingShingle |
van Beek Nina Rentzsch Kristin Probst Christian Komorowski Lars Kasperkiewicz Michael Fechner Kai Bloecker Inga M Zillikens Detlef Stöcker Winfried Schmidt Enno Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases |
author_facet |
van Beek Nina Rentzsch Kristin Probst Christian Komorowski Lars Kasperkiewicz Michael Fechner Kai Bloecker Inga M Zillikens Detlef Stöcker Winfried Schmidt Enno |
author_sort |
van Beek Nina |
title |
Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy |
title_short |
Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy |
title_full |
Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy |
title_fullStr |
Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy |
title_sort |
serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: prospective comparison of the biochip mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases |
issn |
1750-1172 |
publishDate |
2012-08-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Various antigen-specific immunoassays are available for the serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases. However, a spectrum of different tissue-based and monovalent antigen-specific assays is required to establish the diagnosis. BIOCHIP mosaics consisting of different antigen substrates allow polyvalent immunofluorescence (IF) tests and provide antibody profiles in a single incubation.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Slides for indirect IF were prepared, containing BIOCHIPS with the following test substrates in each reaction field: monkey esophagus, primate salt-split skin, antigen dots of tetrameric BP180-NC16A as well as desmoglein 1-, desmoglein 3-, and BP230gC-expressing human HEK293 cells. This BIOCHIP mosaic was probed using a large panel of sera from patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV, n = 65), pemphigus foliaceus (PF, n = 50), bullous pemphigoid (BP, n = 42), and non-inflammatory skin diseases (n = 97) as well as from healthy blood donors (n = 100). Furthermore, to evaluate the usability in routine diagnostics, 454 consecutive sera from patients with suspected immunobullous disorders were prospectively analyzed in parallel using a) the IF BIOCHIP mosaic and b) a panel of single antibody assays as commonly used by specialized centers.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Using the BIOCHIP mosaic, sensitivities of the desmoglein 1-, desmoglein 3-, and NC16A-specific substrates were 90%, 98.5% and 100%, respectively. BP230 was recognized by 54% of the BP sera. Specificities ranged from 98.2% to 100% for all substrates. In the prospective study, a high agreement was found between the results obtained by the BIOCHIP mosaic and the single test panel for the diagnosis of BP, PV, PF, and sera without serum autoantibodies (Cohen’s κ between 0.88 and 0.97).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The BIOCHIP mosaic contains sensitive and specific substrates for the indirect IF diagnosis of BP, PF, and PV. Its diagnostic accuracy is comparable with the conventional multi-step approach. The highly standardized and practical BIOCHIP mosaic will facilitate the serological diagnosis of autoimmune blistering diseases.</p> |
url |
http://www.ojrd.com/content/7/1/49 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vanbeeknina serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy AT rentzschkristin serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy AT probstchristian serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy AT komorowskilars serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy AT kasperkiewiczmichael serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy AT fechnerkai serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy AT bloeckeringam serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy AT zillikensdetlef serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy AT stockerwinfried serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy AT schmidtenno serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy |
_version_ |
1725941693783474176 |