Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Various antigen-specific immunoassays are available for the serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases. However, a spectrum of different tissue-based and monovalent antigen-specific assays is required to establish the diagn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: van Beek Nina, Rentzsch Kristin, Probst Christian, Komorowski Lars, Kasperkiewicz Michael, Fechner Kai, Bloecker Inga M, Zillikens Detlef, Stöcker Winfried, Schmidt Enno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-08-01
Series:Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Online Access:http://www.ojrd.com/content/7/1/49
id doaj-f8955826bc824e1195f88b4d628009af
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f8955826bc824e1195f88b4d628009af2020-11-24T21:36:19ZengBMCOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases1750-11722012-08-01714910.1186/1750-1172-7-49Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategyvan Beek NinaRentzsch KristinProbst ChristianKomorowski LarsKasperkiewicz MichaelFechner KaiBloecker Inga MZillikens DetlefStöcker WinfriedSchmidt Enno<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Various antigen-specific immunoassays are available for the serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases. However, a spectrum of different tissue-based and monovalent antigen-specific assays is required to establish the diagnosis. BIOCHIP mosaics consisting of different antigen substrates allow polyvalent immunofluorescence (IF) tests and provide antibody profiles in a single incubation.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Slides for indirect IF were prepared, containing BIOCHIPS with the following test substrates in each reaction field: monkey esophagus, primate salt-split skin, antigen dots of tetrameric BP180-NC16A as well as desmoglein 1-, desmoglein 3-, and BP230gC-expressing human HEK293 cells. This BIOCHIP mosaic was probed using a large panel of sera from patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV, n = 65), pemphigus foliaceus (PF, n = 50), bullous pemphigoid (BP, n = 42), and non-inflammatory skin diseases (n = 97) as well as from healthy blood donors (n = 100). Furthermore, to evaluate the usability in routine diagnostics, 454 consecutive sera from patients with suspected immunobullous disorders were prospectively analyzed in parallel using a) the IF BIOCHIP mosaic and b) a panel of single antibody assays as commonly used by specialized centers.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Using the BIOCHIP mosaic, sensitivities of the desmoglein 1-, desmoglein 3-, and NC16A-specific substrates were 90%, 98.5% and 100%, respectively. BP230 was recognized by 54% of the BP sera. Specificities ranged from 98.2% to 100% for all substrates. In the prospective study, a high agreement was found between the results obtained by the BIOCHIP mosaic and the single test panel for the diagnosis of BP, PV, PF, and sera without serum autoantibodies (Cohen’s κ between 0.88 and 0.97).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The BIOCHIP mosaic contains sensitive and specific substrates for the indirect IF diagnosis of BP, PF, and PV. Its diagnostic accuracy is comparable with the conventional multi-step approach. The highly standardized and practical BIOCHIP mosaic will facilitate the serological diagnosis of autoimmune blistering diseases.</p> http://www.ojrd.com/content/7/1/49
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author van Beek Nina
Rentzsch Kristin
Probst Christian
Komorowski Lars
Kasperkiewicz Michael
Fechner Kai
Bloecker Inga M
Zillikens Detlef
Stöcker Winfried
Schmidt Enno
spellingShingle van Beek Nina
Rentzsch Kristin
Probst Christian
Komorowski Lars
Kasperkiewicz Michael
Fechner Kai
Bloecker Inga M
Zillikens Detlef
Stöcker Winfried
Schmidt Enno
Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
author_facet van Beek Nina
Rentzsch Kristin
Probst Christian
Komorowski Lars
Kasperkiewicz Michael
Fechner Kai
Bloecker Inga M
Zillikens Detlef
Stöcker Winfried
Schmidt Enno
author_sort van Beek Nina
title Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy
title_short Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy
title_full Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy
title_fullStr Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy
title_full_unstemmed Serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: Prospective comparison of the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy
title_sort serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous skin diseases: prospective comparison of the biochip mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique with the conventional multi-step single test strategy
publisher BMC
series Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
issn 1750-1172
publishDate 2012-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Various antigen-specific immunoassays are available for the serological diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases. However, a spectrum of different tissue-based and monovalent antigen-specific assays is required to establish the diagnosis. BIOCHIP mosaics consisting of different antigen substrates allow polyvalent immunofluorescence (IF) tests and provide antibody profiles in a single incubation.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Slides for indirect IF were prepared, containing BIOCHIPS with the following test substrates in each reaction field: monkey esophagus, primate salt-split skin, antigen dots of tetrameric BP180-NC16A as well as desmoglein 1-, desmoglein 3-, and BP230gC-expressing human HEK293 cells. This BIOCHIP mosaic was probed using a large panel of sera from patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV, n = 65), pemphigus foliaceus (PF, n = 50), bullous pemphigoid (BP, n = 42), and non-inflammatory skin diseases (n = 97) as well as from healthy blood donors (n = 100). Furthermore, to evaluate the usability in routine diagnostics, 454 consecutive sera from patients with suspected immunobullous disorders were prospectively analyzed in parallel using a) the IF BIOCHIP mosaic and b) a panel of single antibody assays as commonly used by specialized centers.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Using the BIOCHIP mosaic, sensitivities of the desmoglein 1-, desmoglein 3-, and NC16A-specific substrates were 90%, 98.5% and 100%, respectively. BP230 was recognized by 54% of the BP sera. Specificities ranged from 98.2% to 100% for all substrates. In the prospective study, a high agreement was found between the results obtained by the BIOCHIP mosaic and the single test panel for the diagnosis of BP, PV, PF, and sera without serum autoantibodies (Cohen’s κ between 0.88 and 0.97).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The BIOCHIP mosaic contains sensitive and specific substrates for the indirect IF diagnosis of BP, PF, and PV. Its diagnostic accuracy is comparable with the conventional multi-step approach. The highly standardized and practical BIOCHIP mosaic will facilitate the serological diagnosis of autoimmune blistering diseases.</p>
url http://www.ojrd.com/content/7/1/49
work_keys_str_mv AT vanbeeknina serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy
AT rentzschkristin serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy
AT probstchristian serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy
AT komorowskilars serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy
AT kasperkiewiczmichael serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy
AT fechnerkai serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy
AT bloeckeringam serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy
AT zillikensdetlef serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy
AT stockerwinfried serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy
AT schmidtenno serologicaldiagnosisofautoimmunebullousskindiseasesprospectivecomparisonofthebiochipmosaicbasedindirectimmunofluorescencetechniquewiththeconventionalmultistepsingleteststrategy
_version_ 1725941693783474176