Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity
Signals in the environment are rarely specified exactly: our visual system may know what to look for (e.g. a specific face), but not its exact configuration (e.g. where in the room, or in what orientation). Uncertainty, and the ability to deal with it, is a fundamental aspect of visual processing. T...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2010-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2010.00151/full |
id |
doaj-f894e7b5f33e4349aad883b259a5e317 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f894e7b5f33e4349aad883b259a5e3172020-11-24T23:17:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience1662-51882010-11-01410.3389/fncom.2010.001511460Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearityPeter Neri0University of AberdeenSignals in the environment are rarely specified exactly: our visual system may know what to look for (e.g. a specific face), but not its exact configuration (e.g. where in the room, or in what orientation). Uncertainty, and the ability to deal with it, is a fundamental aspect of visual processing. The MAX model is the current gold standard for describing how human vision handles uncertainty: of all possible configurations for the signal, the observer chooses the one corresponding to the template associated with the largest response. We propose an alternative model in which the MAX operation, which is a dynamic nonlinearity (depends on multiple inputs from several stimulus locations) and happens after the input stimulus has been matched to the possible templates, is replaced by an early static nonlinearity (depends only on one input corresponding to one stimulus location) which is applied before template-matching. By exploiting an integrated set of analytical and experimental tools, we show that this model is able to account for a number of empirical observations otherwise unaccounted for by the MAX model, and is more robust with respect to the realistic limitations imposed by the available neural hardware. We then discuss how these results, currently restricted to a simple visual detection task, may extend to a wider range of problems in sensory processing.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2010.00151/fullreverse correlationSignal detection theoryVisual psychophysicsHammerstein cascadenonlinear kernelVolterra expansion |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Peter Neri |
spellingShingle |
Peter Neri Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience reverse correlation Signal detection theory Visual psychophysics Hammerstein cascade nonlinear kernel Volterra expansion |
author_facet |
Peter Neri |
author_sort |
Peter Neri |
title |
Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity |
title_short |
Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity |
title_full |
Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity |
title_fullStr |
Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity |
title_sort |
visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience |
issn |
1662-5188 |
publishDate |
2010-11-01 |
description |
Signals in the environment are rarely specified exactly: our visual system may know what to look for (e.g. a specific face), but not its exact configuration (e.g. where in the room, or in what orientation). Uncertainty, and the ability to deal with it, is a fundamental aspect of visual processing. The MAX model is the current gold standard for describing how human vision handles uncertainty: of all possible configurations for the signal, the observer chooses the one corresponding to the template associated with the largest response. We propose an alternative model in which the MAX operation, which is a dynamic nonlinearity (depends on multiple inputs from several stimulus locations) and happens after the input stimulus has been matched to the possible templates, is replaced by an early static nonlinearity (depends only on one input corresponding to one stimulus location) which is applied before template-matching. By exploiting an integrated set of analytical and experimental tools, we show that this model is able to account for a number of empirical observations otherwise unaccounted for by the MAX model, and is more robust with respect to the realistic limitations imposed by the available neural hardware. We then discuss how these results, currently restricted to a simple visual detection task, may extend to a wider range of problems in sensory processing. |
topic |
reverse correlation Signal detection theory Visual psychophysics Hammerstein cascade nonlinear kernel Volterra expansion |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2010.00151/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peterneri visualdetectionunderuncertaintyoperatesviaanearlystaticnotlatedynamicnonlinearity |
_version_ |
1725583036063416320 |