Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity

Signals in the environment are rarely specified exactly: our visual system may know what to look for (e.g. a specific face), but not its exact configuration (e.g. where in the room, or in what orientation). Uncertainty, and the ability to deal with it, is a fundamental aspect of visual processing. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peter Neri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2010-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2010.00151/full
id doaj-f894e7b5f33e4349aad883b259a5e317
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f894e7b5f33e4349aad883b259a5e3172020-11-24T23:17:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience1662-51882010-11-01410.3389/fncom.2010.001511460Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearityPeter Neri0University of AberdeenSignals in the environment are rarely specified exactly: our visual system may know what to look for (e.g. a specific face), but not its exact configuration (e.g. where in the room, or in what orientation). Uncertainty, and the ability to deal with it, is a fundamental aspect of visual processing. The MAX model is the current gold standard for describing how human vision handles uncertainty: of all possible configurations for the signal, the observer chooses the one corresponding to the template associated with the largest response. We propose an alternative model in which the MAX operation, which is a dynamic nonlinearity (depends on multiple inputs from several stimulus locations) and happens after the input stimulus has been matched to the possible templates, is replaced by an early static nonlinearity (depends only on one input corresponding to one stimulus location) which is applied before template-matching. By exploiting an integrated set of analytical and experimental tools, we show that this model is able to account for a number of empirical observations otherwise unaccounted for by the MAX model, and is more robust with respect to the realistic limitations imposed by the available neural hardware. We then discuss how these results, currently restricted to a simple visual detection task, may extend to a wider range of problems in sensory processing.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2010.00151/fullreverse correlationSignal detection theoryVisual psychophysicsHammerstein cascadenonlinear kernelVolterra expansion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Neri
spellingShingle Peter Neri
Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
reverse correlation
Signal detection theory
Visual psychophysics
Hammerstein cascade
nonlinear kernel
Volterra expansion
author_facet Peter Neri
author_sort Peter Neri
title Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity
title_short Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity
title_full Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity
title_fullStr Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity
title_full_unstemmed Visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity
title_sort visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, nonlinearity
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
issn 1662-5188
publishDate 2010-11-01
description Signals in the environment are rarely specified exactly: our visual system may know what to look for (e.g. a specific face), but not its exact configuration (e.g. where in the room, or in what orientation). Uncertainty, and the ability to deal with it, is a fundamental aspect of visual processing. The MAX model is the current gold standard for describing how human vision handles uncertainty: of all possible configurations for the signal, the observer chooses the one corresponding to the template associated with the largest response. We propose an alternative model in which the MAX operation, which is a dynamic nonlinearity (depends on multiple inputs from several stimulus locations) and happens after the input stimulus has been matched to the possible templates, is replaced by an early static nonlinearity (depends only on one input corresponding to one stimulus location) which is applied before template-matching. By exploiting an integrated set of analytical and experimental tools, we show that this model is able to account for a number of empirical observations otherwise unaccounted for by the MAX model, and is more robust with respect to the realistic limitations imposed by the available neural hardware. We then discuss how these results, currently restricted to a simple visual detection task, may extend to a wider range of problems in sensory processing.
topic reverse correlation
Signal detection theory
Visual psychophysics
Hammerstein cascade
nonlinear kernel
Volterra expansion
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2010.00151/full
work_keys_str_mv AT peterneri visualdetectionunderuncertaintyoperatesviaanearlystaticnotlatedynamicnonlinearity
_version_ 1725583036063416320