Monitoring HIV Testing in the United States: Consequences of Methodology Changes to National Surveys.

<h4>Objective</h4>In 2011, the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), an in-person household interview, revised the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) section of the survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a telephone-based survey, added cellphone numbers to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michelle M Van Handel, Bernard M Branson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125637
id doaj-f88ecf57fa7f41af8c3cdc25c756625c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f88ecf57fa7f41af8c3cdc25c756625c2021-03-04T08:15:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01104e012563710.1371/journal.pone.0125637Monitoring HIV Testing in the United States: Consequences of Methodology Changes to National Surveys.Michelle M Van HandelBernard M Branson<h4>Objective</h4>In 2011, the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), an in-person household interview, revised the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) section of the survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a telephone-based survey, added cellphone numbers to its sampling frame. We sought to determine how these changes might affect assessment of HIV testing trends.<h4>Methods</h4>We used linear regression with pairwise contrasts with 2003-2013 data from NHIS and BRFSS to compare percentages of persons aged 18-64 years who reported HIV testing in landline versus cellphone-only households before and after 2011, when NHIS revised its in-person questionnaire and BRFSS added cellphone numbers to its telephone-based sample.<h4>Results</h4>In NHIS, the percentage of persons in cellphone-only households increased 13-fold from 2003 to 2013. The percentage ever tested for HIV was 6%-10% higher among persons in cellphone-only than landline households. The percentage ever tested for HIV increased significantly from 40.2% in 2003 to 45.0% in 2010, but was significantly lower in 2011 (40.6%) and 2012 (39.7%). In BRFSS, the percentage ever tested decreased significantly from 45.9% in 2003 to 40.2% in 2010, but increased to 42.9% in 2011 and 43.5% in 2013.<h4>Conclusions</h4>HIV testing estimates were lower after NHIS questionnaire changes but higher after BRFSS methodology changes. Data before and after 2011 are not comparable, complicating assessment of trends.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125637
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michelle M Van Handel
Bernard M Branson
spellingShingle Michelle M Van Handel
Bernard M Branson
Monitoring HIV Testing in the United States: Consequences of Methodology Changes to National Surveys.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Michelle M Van Handel
Bernard M Branson
author_sort Michelle M Van Handel
title Monitoring HIV Testing in the United States: Consequences of Methodology Changes to National Surveys.
title_short Monitoring HIV Testing in the United States: Consequences of Methodology Changes to National Surveys.
title_full Monitoring HIV Testing in the United States: Consequences of Methodology Changes to National Surveys.
title_fullStr Monitoring HIV Testing in the United States: Consequences of Methodology Changes to National Surveys.
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring HIV Testing in the United States: Consequences of Methodology Changes to National Surveys.
title_sort monitoring hiv testing in the united states: consequences of methodology changes to national surveys.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description <h4>Objective</h4>In 2011, the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), an in-person household interview, revised the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) section of the survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a telephone-based survey, added cellphone numbers to its sampling frame. We sought to determine how these changes might affect assessment of HIV testing trends.<h4>Methods</h4>We used linear regression with pairwise contrasts with 2003-2013 data from NHIS and BRFSS to compare percentages of persons aged 18-64 years who reported HIV testing in landline versus cellphone-only households before and after 2011, when NHIS revised its in-person questionnaire and BRFSS added cellphone numbers to its telephone-based sample.<h4>Results</h4>In NHIS, the percentage of persons in cellphone-only households increased 13-fold from 2003 to 2013. The percentage ever tested for HIV was 6%-10% higher among persons in cellphone-only than landline households. The percentage ever tested for HIV increased significantly from 40.2% in 2003 to 45.0% in 2010, but was significantly lower in 2011 (40.6%) and 2012 (39.7%). In BRFSS, the percentage ever tested decreased significantly from 45.9% in 2003 to 40.2% in 2010, but increased to 42.9% in 2011 and 43.5% in 2013.<h4>Conclusions</h4>HIV testing estimates were lower after NHIS questionnaire changes but higher after BRFSS methodology changes. Data before and after 2011 are not comparable, complicating assessment of trends.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125637
work_keys_str_mv AT michellemvanhandel monitoringhivtestingintheunitedstatesconsequencesofmethodologychangestonationalsurveys
AT bernardmbranson monitoringhivtestingintheunitedstatesconsequencesofmethodologychangestonationalsurveys
_version_ 1714808098870263808