A Video Browsing Tool for Content Management in Postproduction
We propose an interactive video browsing tool for supporting content management and selection in postproduction. The approach is based on a process model for multimedia content abstraction. A software framework based on this process model and desktop and Web-based client applications are presented....
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2010-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/856761 |
id |
doaj-f87e7f5a96914b53934f23a290c9aab1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f87e7f5a96914b53934f23a290c9aab12020-11-24T21:54:24ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting1687-75781687-75862010-01-01201010.1155/2010/856761856761A Video Browsing Tool for Content Management in PostproductionWerner Bailer0Wolfgang Weiss1Gert Kienast2Georg Thallinger3Werner Haas4JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Institute of Information Systems, Steyrergasse 17, 8010 Graz, AustriaJOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Institute of Information Systems, Steyrergasse 17, 8010 Graz, AustriaJOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Institute of Information Systems, Steyrergasse 17, 8010 Graz, AustriaJOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Institute of Information Systems, Steyrergasse 17, 8010 Graz, AustriaJOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Institute of Information Systems, Steyrergasse 17, 8010 Graz, AustriaWe propose an interactive video browsing tool for supporting content management and selection in postproduction. The approach is based on a process model for multimedia content abstraction. A software framework based on this process model and desktop and Web-based client applications are presented. For evaluation, we apply two TRECVID style fact finding approaches (retrieval and question answering tasks) and a user survey to the evaluation of the video browsing tool. We analyze the correlation between the results of the different methods, whether different aspects can be evaluated independently with the survey, and if a learning effect can be measured with the different methods, and we also compare the full-featured desktop and the limited Web-based user interface. The results show that the retrieval task correlates better with the user experience according to the survey. The survey rather measures the general user experience while different aspects of the usability cannot be analyzed independently.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/856761 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Werner Bailer Wolfgang Weiss Gert Kienast Georg Thallinger Werner Haas |
spellingShingle |
Werner Bailer Wolfgang Weiss Gert Kienast Georg Thallinger Werner Haas A Video Browsing Tool for Content Management in Postproduction International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting |
author_facet |
Werner Bailer Wolfgang Weiss Gert Kienast Georg Thallinger Werner Haas |
author_sort |
Werner Bailer |
title |
A Video Browsing Tool for Content Management in Postproduction |
title_short |
A Video Browsing Tool for Content Management in Postproduction |
title_full |
A Video Browsing Tool for Content Management in Postproduction |
title_fullStr |
A Video Browsing Tool for Content Management in Postproduction |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Video Browsing Tool for Content Management in Postproduction |
title_sort |
video browsing tool for content management in postproduction |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting |
issn |
1687-7578 1687-7586 |
publishDate |
2010-01-01 |
description |
We propose an interactive video browsing tool for supporting content management and selection in postproduction. The approach is based on a process model for multimedia content abstraction. A software framework based on this process model and desktop and Web-based client applications are presented. For evaluation, we apply two TRECVID style fact finding approaches (retrieval and question answering tasks) and a user survey to the evaluation of the video browsing tool. We analyze the correlation between the results of the different methods, whether different aspects can be evaluated independently with the survey, and if a learning effect can be measured with the different methods, and we also compare the full-featured desktop and the limited Web-based user interface. The results show that the retrieval task correlates better with the user experience according to the survey. The survey rather measures the general user experience while different aspects of the usability cannot be analyzed independently. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/856761 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wernerbailer avideobrowsingtoolforcontentmanagementinpostproduction AT wolfgangweiss avideobrowsingtoolforcontentmanagementinpostproduction AT gertkienast avideobrowsingtoolforcontentmanagementinpostproduction AT georgthallinger avideobrowsingtoolforcontentmanagementinpostproduction AT wernerhaas avideobrowsingtoolforcontentmanagementinpostproduction AT wernerbailer videobrowsingtoolforcontentmanagementinpostproduction AT wolfgangweiss videobrowsingtoolforcontentmanagementinpostproduction AT gertkienast videobrowsingtoolforcontentmanagementinpostproduction AT georgthallinger videobrowsingtoolforcontentmanagementinpostproduction AT wernerhaas videobrowsingtoolforcontentmanagementinpostproduction |
_version_ |
1725867231454167040 |