Unbalanced, Idle, Canonical and Particular: Polysemous Adjectives in English Dictionaries

This study seeks to compare how various English dictionaries distinguish multiple meanings, focusing on a particular class of words identifiable in dictionary classification, namely, polysemous adjectives. The polysemy displayed by adjectives tends to be of a heavily context-dependent type. A great...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jonathan Stammers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 2008-07-01
Series:Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/771
id doaj-f87cd63fd1e846cb80899bac738e108f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f87cd63fd1e846cb80899bac738e108f2020-11-24T23:12:18ZengUniversité Jean Moulin - Lyon 3Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology1951-62152008-07-01110.4000/lexis.771Unbalanced, Idle, Canonical and Particular: Polysemous Adjectives in English DictionariesJonathan StammersThis study seeks to compare how various English dictionaries distinguish multiple meanings, focusing on a particular class of words identifiable in dictionary classification, namely, polysemous adjectives. The polysemy displayed by adjectives tends to be of a heavily context-dependent type. A great deal of the literature concerning polysemy has little bearing upon adjectives. Adjectives are also a varied word-class, thus posing a range of challenges to the lexicographer. This study looks at six recently published British monolingual dictionaries of English, both for native speakers and advanced learners. A random sample (based on Collins English Dictionary) of adjectives with many senses is selected, and their respective dictionary entries compared and evaluated, following analysis of corpus data. The random sample chosen prove a quite heterogeneous set, with some appearing to be not true adjectives; others to be not truly polysemous; some having a clear hierarchy of senses; others much less clear. Differences between senses are often highly subtle and contextually determined, forming a semantic cline, or continuum of senses, which dictionaries often divide quite differently. Detailed results are shown here for four of the adjectives, unbalanced, idle, canonical and particular, and other results discussed in brief.http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/771
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonathan Stammers
spellingShingle Jonathan Stammers
Unbalanced, Idle, Canonical and Particular: Polysemous Adjectives in English Dictionaries
Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology
author_facet Jonathan Stammers
author_sort Jonathan Stammers
title Unbalanced, Idle, Canonical and Particular: Polysemous Adjectives in English Dictionaries
title_short Unbalanced, Idle, Canonical and Particular: Polysemous Adjectives in English Dictionaries
title_full Unbalanced, Idle, Canonical and Particular: Polysemous Adjectives in English Dictionaries
title_fullStr Unbalanced, Idle, Canonical and Particular: Polysemous Adjectives in English Dictionaries
title_full_unstemmed Unbalanced, Idle, Canonical and Particular: Polysemous Adjectives in English Dictionaries
title_sort unbalanced, idle, canonical and particular: polysemous adjectives in english dictionaries
publisher Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3
series Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology
issn 1951-6215
publishDate 2008-07-01
description This study seeks to compare how various English dictionaries distinguish multiple meanings, focusing on a particular class of words identifiable in dictionary classification, namely, polysemous adjectives. The polysemy displayed by adjectives tends to be of a heavily context-dependent type. A great deal of the literature concerning polysemy has little bearing upon adjectives. Adjectives are also a varied word-class, thus posing a range of challenges to the lexicographer. This study looks at six recently published British monolingual dictionaries of English, both for native speakers and advanced learners. A random sample (based on Collins English Dictionary) of adjectives with many senses is selected, and their respective dictionary entries compared and evaluated, following analysis of corpus data. The random sample chosen prove a quite heterogeneous set, with some appearing to be not true adjectives; others to be not truly polysemous; some having a clear hierarchy of senses; others much less clear. Differences between senses are often highly subtle and contextually determined, forming a semantic cline, or continuum of senses, which dictionaries often divide quite differently. Detailed results are shown here for four of the adjectives, unbalanced, idle, canonical and particular, and other results discussed in brief.
url http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/771
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanstammers unbalancedidlecanonicalandparticularpolysemousadjectivesinenglishdictionaries
_version_ 1725601450433708032