Mega-regional trade Agreements: Costly distractions for developing countries?
Abstract This paper examines the relationship between mega-regional trade Agreements and diet-related health given that such Agreements aim to liberalize “substantially all trade and investment” that could potentially impact on health through tariff elimination and stronger intellectual property com...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2017-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Economic Structures |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40008-017-0090-y |
id |
doaj-f84138156aa540e48d73671b183a5bf7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f84138156aa540e48d73671b183a5bf72020-11-25T00:44:16ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Economic Structures2193-24092017-10-016111810.1186/s40008-017-0090-yMega-regional trade Agreements: Costly distractions for developing countries?Badri G. Narayanan0Sangeeta Khorana1University of Washington SeattleBournemouth UniversityAbstract This paper examines the relationship between mega-regional trade Agreements and diet-related health given that such Agreements aim to liberalize “substantially all trade and investment” that could potentially impact on health through tariff elimination and stronger intellectual property commitments in partner countries. We analyse two interlinked policy concerns: first, how tariff reduction/elimination under mega-regional Agreements impact on the production of sugar? Second, how mega-regional Agreements with Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)-style and TRIPS-plus commitments modify intellectual property rules among partner countries and impact on developing countries’ access to life-saving drugs and medicines? Using a dynamic Global Trade Analysis Project model, we find there are significant health consequences of trade commitments undertaken by developing countries with potential detrimental health effect on populations such that first, higher production of sugar alters consumption trends. Second, despite stricter intellectual property rules, which result in net global gains, developing countries suffer from the regulatory chill effect.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40008-017-0090-yGovernment policy (I18)Economic integration (F15)Trade policy (F13) |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Badri G. Narayanan Sangeeta Khorana |
spellingShingle |
Badri G. Narayanan Sangeeta Khorana Mega-regional trade Agreements: Costly distractions for developing countries? Journal of Economic Structures Government policy (I18) Economic integration (F15) Trade policy (F13) |
author_facet |
Badri G. Narayanan Sangeeta Khorana |
author_sort |
Badri G. Narayanan |
title |
Mega-regional trade Agreements: Costly distractions for developing countries? |
title_short |
Mega-regional trade Agreements: Costly distractions for developing countries? |
title_full |
Mega-regional trade Agreements: Costly distractions for developing countries? |
title_fullStr |
Mega-regional trade Agreements: Costly distractions for developing countries? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mega-regional trade Agreements: Costly distractions for developing countries? |
title_sort |
mega-regional trade agreements: costly distractions for developing countries? |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Journal of Economic Structures |
issn |
2193-2409 |
publishDate |
2017-10-01 |
description |
Abstract This paper examines the relationship between mega-regional trade Agreements and diet-related health given that such Agreements aim to liberalize “substantially all trade and investment” that could potentially impact on health through tariff elimination and stronger intellectual property commitments in partner countries. We analyse two interlinked policy concerns: first, how tariff reduction/elimination under mega-regional Agreements impact on the production of sugar? Second, how mega-regional Agreements with Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)-style and TRIPS-plus commitments modify intellectual property rules among partner countries and impact on developing countries’ access to life-saving drugs and medicines? Using a dynamic Global Trade Analysis Project model, we find there are significant health consequences of trade commitments undertaken by developing countries with potential detrimental health effect on populations such that first, higher production of sugar alters consumption trends. Second, despite stricter intellectual property rules, which result in net global gains, developing countries suffer from the regulatory chill effect. |
topic |
Government policy (I18) Economic integration (F15) Trade policy (F13) |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40008-017-0090-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT badrignarayanan megaregionaltradeagreementscostlydistractionsfordevelopingcountries AT sangeetakhorana megaregionaltradeagreementscostlydistractionsfordevelopingcountries |
_version_ |
1725275301288607744 |