Accepted standards on how to give a Medical Research Presentation: a systematic review of expert opinion papers

Background: This systematic review aimed to extract recommendations from expert opinion articles on how to give a medical research presentation on a scientific conference and to determine whether the experts agree on what makes an effective or poor presentation. Methods: Presentation-related terms w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blome, Christine, Sondermann, Hanno, Augustin, Matthias
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2017-02-01
Series:GMS Journal for Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/zma/2017-34/zma001088.shtml
id doaj-f83f6127db31432cbead1360531fe155
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f83f6127db31432cbead1360531fe1552020-11-25T03:20:41ZdeuGerman Medical Science GMS Publishing HouseGMS Journal for Medical Education2366-50172017-02-01341Doc1110.3205/zma001088Accepted standards on how to give a Medical Research Presentation: a systematic review of expert opinion papersBlome, Christine0Sondermann, Hanno1Augustin, Matthias2University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology (CVderm), Hamburg, GermanyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology (CVderm), Hamburg, GermanyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology (CVderm), Hamburg, GermanyBackground: This systematic review aimed to extract recommendations from expert opinion articles on how to give a medical research presentation on a scientific conference and to determine whether the experts agree on what makes an effective or poor presentation. Methods: Presentation-related terms were searched within article titles listed in PubMed, restricting the search to English-language articles published from January 1975 to July 2015. Recommendations were extracted from the articles, grouped by content, and analyzed for frequency. Ninety-one articles were included. Among 679 different recommendations, 29 were given in more than 20% of articles each. The five most frequent recommendations were to keep slides simple, adjust the talk to the audience, rehearse, not read the talk from slides or a manuscript, and make eye contact. Results: No article gave advice that was the complete opposite of the 29 most frequent recommendations with the exception of whether a light or dark background should be used for slides. Conclusions: Researchers should comply with these widely accepted standards to be perceived as effective presenters.http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/zma/2017-34/zma001088.shtmlscientific talksscientific presentationsscientific conferenceslecturingPowerPoint
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Blome, Christine
Sondermann, Hanno
Augustin, Matthias
spellingShingle Blome, Christine
Sondermann, Hanno
Augustin, Matthias
Accepted standards on how to give a Medical Research Presentation: a systematic review of expert opinion papers
GMS Journal for Medical Education
scientific talks
scientific presentations
scientific conferences
lecturing
PowerPoint
author_facet Blome, Christine
Sondermann, Hanno
Augustin, Matthias
author_sort Blome, Christine
title Accepted standards on how to give a Medical Research Presentation: a systematic review of expert opinion papers
title_short Accepted standards on how to give a Medical Research Presentation: a systematic review of expert opinion papers
title_full Accepted standards on how to give a Medical Research Presentation: a systematic review of expert opinion papers
title_fullStr Accepted standards on how to give a Medical Research Presentation: a systematic review of expert opinion papers
title_full_unstemmed Accepted standards on how to give a Medical Research Presentation: a systematic review of expert opinion papers
title_sort accepted standards on how to give a medical research presentation: a systematic review of expert opinion papers
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
series GMS Journal for Medical Education
issn 2366-5017
publishDate 2017-02-01
description Background: This systematic review aimed to extract recommendations from expert opinion articles on how to give a medical research presentation on a scientific conference and to determine whether the experts agree on what makes an effective or poor presentation. Methods: Presentation-related terms were searched within article titles listed in PubMed, restricting the search to English-language articles published from January 1975 to July 2015. Recommendations were extracted from the articles, grouped by content, and analyzed for frequency. Ninety-one articles were included. Among 679 different recommendations, 29 were given in more than 20% of articles each. The five most frequent recommendations were to keep slides simple, adjust the talk to the audience, rehearse, not read the talk from slides or a manuscript, and make eye contact. Results: No article gave advice that was the complete opposite of the 29 most frequent recommendations with the exception of whether a light or dark background should be used for slides. Conclusions: Researchers should comply with these widely accepted standards to be perceived as effective presenters.
topic scientific talks
scientific presentations
scientific conferences
lecturing
PowerPoint
url http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/zma/2017-34/zma001088.shtml
work_keys_str_mv AT blomechristine acceptedstandardsonhowtogiveamedicalresearchpresentationasystematicreviewofexpertopinionpapers
AT sondermannhanno acceptedstandardsonhowtogiveamedicalresearchpresentationasystematicreviewofexpertopinionpapers
AT augustinmatthias acceptedstandardsonhowtogiveamedicalresearchpresentationasystematicreviewofexpertopinionpapers
_version_ 1724617201838718976