Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study
Objective: The aim of this randomized, controlled, single-blind, split-mouth and single-center clinical trial was to compare the one-year clinical performances of a high viscosity glass ionomer and a nano-hybrid composite resin on occlusal restorations of mandibular second molar teeth performed with...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Gazi University
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Acta Odontologica Turcica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gaziaot/issue/64759/796790 |
id |
doaj-f827c3fcd70c4d7d81bfee6e43117183 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f827c3fcd70c4d7d81bfee6e431171832021-09-01T12:44:18ZengGazi UniversityActa Odontologica Turcica2147-690X2021-09-01383687410.17214/gaziaot.796790Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth studyHüseyin HATIRLIBilal YAŞAEsra UZER CELIK Objective: The aim of this randomized, controlled, single-blind, split-mouth and single-center clinical trial was to compare the one-year clinical performances of a high viscosity glass ionomer and a nano-hybrid composite resin on occlusal restorations of mandibular second molar teeth performed without rubber dam isolation. Materials and Method: Occlusal carious lesions on right and left mandibular second molars of 56 patients (26 female, 30 male) were restored according to a split-mouth design in this study. A high viscosity glass ionomer (EQA; Equia Fil, GC) and a nano-hybrid composite resin (GSO; GrandioSo, Voco) were applied according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Clinical evaluation of the restorations was performed according to the FDI criteria at one-week, six-month, and one-year follow-ups. The data were statistically analyzed using Friedman’s ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=0.05). Results: After one year, considering functional, esthetic, and biological criteria, the rate of restorations scored with 1, 2, and 3, and were evaluated as successful was 96% in the EQA group, and 100% in the GSO group. GSO showed significantly better surface luster than EQA at both six-month and one-year follow-ups (p<0.05). When one-year alterations within the materials were considered; surface luster, surface discoloration, and marginal adaptation scores significantly increased in the GSO group (p<0.017; Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction). On the other hand, the scores of surface luster and marginal adaptation significantly increased in the EQA group (p<0.017). Conclusion: One-year performance of high viscosity glass ionomer and nano-hybrid composite on occlusal restorations of mandibular second molars were considered acceptable without rubber-dam isolation.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gaziaot/issue/64759/796790glass ionomerdental cariescomposite dental resin |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hüseyin HATIRLI Bilal YAŞA Esra UZER CELIK |
spellingShingle |
Hüseyin HATIRLI Bilal YAŞA Esra UZER CELIK Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study Acta Odontologica Turcica glass ionomer dental caries composite dental resin |
author_facet |
Hüseyin HATIRLI Bilal YAŞA Esra UZER CELIK |
author_sort |
Hüseyin HATIRLI |
title |
Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study |
title_short |
Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study |
title_full |
Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study |
title_fullStr |
Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study |
title_sort |
clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study |
publisher |
Gazi University |
series |
Acta Odontologica Turcica |
issn |
2147-690X |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Objective: The aim of this randomized, controlled, single-blind, split-mouth and single-center clinical trial was to compare the one-year clinical performances of a high viscosity glass ionomer and a nano-hybrid composite resin on occlusal restorations of mandibular second molar teeth performed without rubber dam isolation.
Materials and Method: Occlusal carious lesions on right and left mandibular second molars of 56 patients (26 female, 30 male) were restored according to a split-mouth design in this study. A high viscosity glass ionomer (EQA; Equia Fil, GC) and a nano-hybrid composite resin (GSO; GrandioSo, Voco) were applied according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Clinical evaluation of the restorations was performed according to the FDI criteria at one-week, six-month, and one-year follow-ups. The data were statistically analyzed using Friedman’s ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=0.05).
Results: After one year, considering functional, esthetic, and biological criteria, the rate of restorations scored with 1, 2, and 3, and were evaluated as successful was 96% in the EQA group, and 100% in the GSO group. GSO showed significantly better surface luster than EQA at both six-month and one-year follow-ups (p<0.05). When one-year alterations within the materials were considered; surface luster, surface discoloration, and marginal adaptation scores significantly increased in the GSO group (p<0.017; Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction). On the other hand, the scores of surface luster and marginal adaptation significantly increased in the EQA group (p<0.017).
Conclusion: One-year performance of high viscosity glass ionomer and nano-hybrid composite on occlusal restorations of mandibular second molars were considered acceptable without rubber-dam isolation. |
topic |
glass ionomer dental caries composite dental resin |
url |
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gaziaot/issue/64759/796790 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT huseyinhatirli clinicalperformanceofhighviscosityglassionomerandresincompositeonocclusalrestorationsperformedwithoutrubberdamisolationaoneyearrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthstudy AT bilalyasa clinicalperformanceofhighviscosityglassionomerandresincompositeonocclusalrestorationsperformedwithoutrubberdamisolationaoneyearrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthstudy AT esrauzercelik clinicalperformanceofhighviscosityglassionomerandresincompositeonocclusalrestorationsperformedwithoutrubberdamisolationaoneyearrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthstudy |
_version_ |
1721182720542900224 |