Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study

Objective: The aim of this randomized, controlled, single-blind, split-mouth and single-center clinical trial was to compare the one-year clinical performances of a high viscosity glass ionomer and a nano-hybrid composite resin on occlusal restorations of mandibular second molar teeth performed with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hüseyin HATIRLI, Bilal YAŞA, Esra UZER CELIK
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Gazi University 2021-09-01
Series:Acta Odontologica Turcica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gaziaot/issue/64759/796790
id doaj-f827c3fcd70c4d7d81bfee6e43117183
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f827c3fcd70c4d7d81bfee6e431171832021-09-01T12:44:18ZengGazi UniversityActa Odontologica Turcica2147-690X2021-09-01383687410.17214/gaziaot.796790Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth studyHüseyin HATIRLIBilal YAŞAEsra UZER CELIK Objective: The aim of this randomized, controlled, single-blind, split-mouth and single-center clinical trial was to compare the one-year clinical performances of a high viscosity glass ionomer and a nano-hybrid composite resin on occlusal restorations of mandibular second molar teeth performed without rubber dam isolation. Materials and Method: Occlusal carious lesions on right and left mandibular second molars of 56 patients (26 female, 30 male) were restored according to a split-mouth design in this study. A high viscosity glass ionomer (EQA; Equia Fil, GC) and a nano-hybrid composite resin (GSO; GrandioSo, Voco) were applied according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Clinical evaluation of the restorations was performed according to the FDI criteria at one-week, six-month, and one-year follow-ups. The data were statistically analyzed using Friedman’s ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=0.05). Results: After one year, considering functional, esthetic, and biological criteria, the rate of restorations scored with 1, 2, and 3, and were evaluated as successful was 96% in the EQA group, and 100% in the GSO group. GSO showed significantly better surface luster than EQA at both six-month and one-year follow-ups (p<0.05). When one-year alterations within the materials were considered; surface luster, surface discoloration, and marginal adaptation scores significantly increased in the GSO group (p<0.017; Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction). On the other hand, the scores of surface luster and marginal adaptation significantly increased in the EQA group (p<0.017). Conclusion: One-year performance of high viscosity glass ionomer and nano-hybrid composite on occlusal restorations of mandibular second molars were considered acceptable without rubber-dam isolation.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gaziaot/issue/64759/796790glass ionomerdental cariescomposite dental resin
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hüseyin HATIRLI
Bilal YAŞA
Esra UZER CELIK
spellingShingle Hüseyin HATIRLI
Bilal YAŞA
Esra UZER CELIK
Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study
Acta Odontologica Turcica
glass ionomer
dental caries
composite dental resin
author_facet Hüseyin HATIRLI
Bilal YAŞA
Esra UZER CELIK
author_sort Hüseyin HATIRLI
title Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study
title_short Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study
title_full Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study
title_fullStr Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study
title_sort clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a one-year randomized controlled split-mouth study
publisher Gazi University
series Acta Odontologica Turcica
issn 2147-690X
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Objective: The aim of this randomized, controlled, single-blind, split-mouth and single-center clinical trial was to compare the one-year clinical performances of a high viscosity glass ionomer and a nano-hybrid composite resin on occlusal restorations of mandibular second molar teeth performed without rubber dam isolation. Materials and Method: Occlusal carious lesions on right and left mandibular second molars of 56 patients (26 female, 30 male) were restored according to a split-mouth design in this study. A high viscosity glass ionomer (EQA; Equia Fil, GC) and a nano-hybrid composite resin (GSO; GrandioSo, Voco) were applied according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Clinical evaluation of the restorations was performed according to the FDI criteria at one-week, six-month, and one-year follow-ups. The data were statistically analyzed using Friedman’s ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=0.05). Results: After one year, considering functional, esthetic, and biological criteria, the rate of restorations scored with 1, 2, and 3, and were evaluated as successful was 96% in the EQA group, and 100% in the GSO group. GSO showed significantly better surface luster than EQA at both six-month and one-year follow-ups (p<0.05). When one-year alterations within the materials were considered; surface luster, surface discoloration, and marginal adaptation scores significantly increased in the GSO group (p<0.017; Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction). On the other hand, the scores of surface luster and marginal adaptation significantly increased in the EQA group (p<0.017). Conclusion: One-year performance of high viscosity glass ionomer and nano-hybrid composite on occlusal restorations of mandibular second molars were considered acceptable without rubber-dam isolation.
topic glass ionomer
dental caries
composite dental resin
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gaziaot/issue/64759/796790
work_keys_str_mv AT huseyinhatirli clinicalperformanceofhighviscosityglassionomerandresincompositeonocclusalrestorationsperformedwithoutrubberdamisolationaoneyearrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthstudy
AT bilalyasa clinicalperformanceofhighviscosityglassionomerandresincompositeonocclusalrestorationsperformedwithoutrubberdamisolationaoneyearrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthstudy
AT esrauzercelik clinicalperformanceofhighviscosityglassionomerandresincompositeonocclusalrestorationsperformedwithoutrubberdamisolationaoneyearrandomizedcontrolledsplitmouthstudy
_version_ 1721182720542900224