Factors controlling the community structure of picoplankton in contrasting marine environments

• Main Authors: J. L. Otero-Ferrer, P. Cermeño, A. Bode, B. Fernández-Castro, J. M. Gasol, X. A. G. Morán, E. Marañon, V. Moreira-Coello, M. M. Varela, M. Villamaña, B. Mouriño-Carballido
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-10-01
• Series: Biogeosciences
• Online Access: https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/6199/2018/bg-15-6199-2018.pdf
• ISSN: 1726-4170; 1726-4189

<p>The effect of inorganic nutrients on planktonic assemblages has traditionally relied on concentrations rather than estimates of nutrient supply. We combined a novel dataset of hydrographic properties, turbulent mixing, nutrient concentration, and picoplankton community composition with the aims of (i) quantifying the role of temperature, light, and nitrate fluxes as factors controlling the distribution of autotrophic and heterotrophic picoplankton subgroups, as determined by flow cytometry, and (ii) describing the ecological niches of the various components of the picoplankton community. Data were collected at 97 stations in the Atlantic Ocean, including tropical and subtropical open-ocean waters, the northwestern Mediterranean Sea, and the Galician coastal upwelling system of the northwest Iberian Peninsula. A generalized additive model (GAM) approach was used to predict depth-integrated biomass of each picoplankton subgroup based on three niche predictors: sea surface temperature, averaged daily surface irradiance, and the transport of nitrate into the euphotic zone, through both diffusion and advection. In addition, niche overlap among different picoplankton subgroups was computed using nonparametric kernel density functions. Temperature and nitrate supply were more relevant than light in predicting the biomass of most picoplankton subgroups, except for <i>Prochlorococcus</i> and low-nucleic-acid (LNA) prokaryotes, for which irradiance also played a significant role. Nitrate supply was the only factor that allowed the distinction among the ecological niches of all autotrophic and heterotrophic picoplankton subgroups. <i>Prochlorococcus</i> and LNA prokaryotes were more abundant in warmer waters ( &gt; 20&thinsp;°C) where the nitrate fluxes were low, whereas <i>Synechococcus</i> and high-nucleic-acid (HNA) prokaryotes prevailed mainly in cooler environments characterized by intermediate or high levels of nitrate supply. Finally, the niche of picoeukaryotes was defined by low temperatures and high nitrate supply. These results support the key role of nitrate supply, as it not only promotes the growth of large phytoplankton, but it also controls the structure of marine picoplankton communities.</p>