Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness between gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women

Objectives: To compare fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness (AAWT) between women with and without GDM during third trimester and to determine accuracy of AAWT to predict large for gestational age (LGA) infants. Materials and methods: A total of 250 pregnant women, including 125 women with GDM and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Supapen Lertvutivivat, Prasert Sunsaneevithayakul, Pornpimol Ruangvutilert, Dittakarn Boriboonhirunsarn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-09-01
Series:Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Subjects:
LGA
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455920301625
id doaj-f80740652c174e47b3f28fb0d17b7fa8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f80740652c174e47b3f28fb0d17b7fa82020-11-25T01:55:09ZengElsevierTaiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology1028-45592020-09-01595669674Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness between gestational diabetes and normal pregnant womenSupapen Lertvutivivat0Prasert Sunsaneevithayakul1Pornpimol Ruangvutilert2Dittakarn Boriboonhirunsarn3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, ThailandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, ThailandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, ThailandCorresponding author. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. Fax: +662 418 2662.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, ThailandObjectives: To compare fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness (AAWT) between women with and without GDM during third trimester and to determine accuracy of AAWT to predict large for gestational age (LGA) infants. Materials and methods: A total of 250 pregnant women, including 125 women with GDM and 125 women without GDM, were enrolled. Tansabdominal ultrasonographic examinations were performed at 28–30, 32–34 and 36–38 weeks. In addition to standard fetal biometries, AAWT was measured. Patient characteristics and ultrasonographic measurements were compared between groups. Sensitivity and specificity of AAWT for identifying LGA were evaluated. Results: While standard fetal biometries were comparable, mean fetal AAWT in GDM women were significantly higher than those without GDM at 28–30 weeks (2.8 ± 0.8 vs. 2.6 ± 0.6, p = 0.006) and 32–34 weeks (4.0 ± 0.9 vs. 3.5 ± 0.8, p = 0.042). LGA infants had significantly higher fetal AAWT at each time point only in GDM women. Using cut off values of AAWT of ≥2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 mm at 28–30, 32–34, and 36–38 weeks, sensitivity for LGA diagnosis in GDM women were 94.4%, 93.9%, and 89.3%, respectively. The use of abdominal circumference (AC) at >90th percentile showed lower sensitivity but higher specificity, regardless of GDM status. Combination of both measurements increased sensitivity to approximately 90% or higher in every time point, especially among GDM women. Conclusion: Significant increase in fetal AAWT was observed in GDM women at 28–30 and 32–34 weeks. Fetal AAWT significantly increased among LGA infants and had higher sensitivity than AC in identifying LGA during third trimester. In GDM women at 28–30 weeks, AAWT ≥2.0 mm and AC >90th percentile had 97.2% sensitivity for LGA diagnosis.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455920301625Anterior abdominal wall thicknessGestational diabetesLGAUltrasound
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Supapen Lertvutivivat
Prasert Sunsaneevithayakul
Pornpimol Ruangvutilert
Dittakarn Boriboonhirunsarn
spellingShingle Supapen Lertvutivivat
Prasert Sunsaneevithayakul
Pornpimol Ruangvutilert
Dittakarn Boriboonhirunsarn
Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness between gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Anterior abdominal wall thickness
Gestational diabetes
LGA
Ultrasound
author_facet Supapen Lertvutivivat
Prasert Sunsaneevithayakul
Pornpimol Ruangvutilert
Dittakarn Boriboonhirunsarn
author_sort Supapen Lertvutivivat
title Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness between gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women
title_short Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness between gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women
title_full Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness between gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women
title_fullStr Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness between gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women
title_full_unstemmed Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness between gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women
title_sort fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness between gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women
publisher Elsevier
series Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
issn 1028-4559
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Objectives: To compare fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness (AAWT) between women with and without GDM during third trimester and to determine accuracy of AAWT to predict large for gestational age (LGA) infants. Materials and methods: A total of 250 pregnant women, including 125 women with GDM and 125 women without GDM, were enrolled. Tansabdominal ultrasonographic examinations were performed at 28–30, 32–34 and 36–38 weeks. In addition to standard fetal biometries, AAWT was measured. Patient characteristics and ultrasonographic measurements were compared between groups. Sensitivity and specificity of AAWT for identifying LGA were evaluated. Results: While standard fetal biometries were comparable, mean fetal AAWT in GDM women were significantly higher than those without GDM at 28–30 weeks (2.8 ± 0.8 vs. 2.6 ± 0.6, p = 0.006) and 32–34 weeks (4.0 ± 0.9 vs. 3.5 ± 0.8, p = 0.042). LGA infants had significantly higher fetal AAWT at each time point only in GDM women. Using cut off values of AAWT of ≥2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 mm at 28–30, 32–34, and 36–38 weeks, sensitivity for LGA diagnosis in GDM women were 94.4%, 93.9%, and 89.3%, respectively. The use of abdominal circumference (AC) at >90th percentile showed lower sensitivity but higher specificity, regardless of GDM status. Combination of both measurements increased sensitivity to approximately 90% or higher in every time point, especially among GDM women. Conclusion: Significant increase in fetal AAWT was observed in GDM women at 28–30 and 32–34 weeks. Fetal AAWT significantly increased among LGA infants and had higher sensitivity than AC in identifying LGA during third trimester. In GDM women at 28–30 weeks, AAWT ≥2.0 mm and AC >90th percentile had 97.2% sensitivity for LGA diagnosis.
topic Anterior abdominal wall thickness
Gestational diabetes
LGA
Ultrasound
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455920301625
work_keys_str_mv AT supapenlertvutivivat fetalanteriorabdominalwallthicknessbetweengestationaldiabetesandnormalpregnantwomen
AT prasertsunsaneevithayakul fetalanteriorabdominalwallthicknessbetweengestationaldiabetesandnormalpregnantwomen
AT pornpimolruangvutilert fetalanteriorabdominalwallthicknessbetweengestationaldiabetesandnormalpregnantwomen
AT dittakarnboriboonhirunsarn fetalanteriorabdominalwallthicknessbetweengestationaldiabetesandnormalpregnantwomen
_version_ 1724984686841692160