The time to decline: tracing a cohort’s descendants in below replacement populations

Abstract A number of contemporary populations are exhibiting sustained fertility at levels substantially below long-term replacement. Nonetheless, relatively few populations are actually diminishing in size. Here, we approach that apparent paradox by analyzing the time before the number in a birth c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robert Schoen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-01-01
Series:Genus
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41118-018-0026-x
id doaj-f7f710ffa67a4c62ba38f110f93dedba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7f710ffa67a4c62ba38f110f93dedba2020-11-24T21:59:44ZengSpringerOpenGenus2035-55562018-01-0174111010.1186/s41118-018-0026-xThe time to decline: tracing a cohort’s descendants in below replacement populationsRobert Schoen0Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstract A number of contemporary populations are exhibiting sustained fertility at levels substantially below long-term replacement. Nonetheless, relatively few populations are actually diminishing in size. Here, we approach that apparent paradox by analyzing the time before the number in a birth cohort, and its descendants, falls below the initial number in the cohort. First, models are examined with constant below replacement fertility, cohort extinction at age 75 or 85, and no mortality below the highest age attained. For a net reproduction rate (NRR) of 0.75, it takes 150 years for the cohort’s descendants to be fewer than the cohort’s original size if persons live to age 85, and over 130 years if persons live to age 75. If the NRR is at least 0.60, it takes a century before the descendants are fewer in number than the original cohort. Second, projections are done for the USA 2012, Italy 2012, and Hong Kong 2011 assuming that fertility and mortality remain constant. The results resemble the projections. For example, in Italy, with actual mortality and an NRR of 0.70, it takes over 125 years before the descendants of a cohort are fewer in number than the initial cohort. A relatively simple equation for the long term “time to decline” is presented, showing that it depends primarily on the level of fertility, secondarily on longevity, and only modestly on the mean age of fertility.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41118-018-0026-xReplacement levelBelow replacementGenerational successionPopulation projectionPopulation decrease
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert Schoen
spellingShingle Robert Schoen
The time to decline: tracing a cohort’s descendants in below replacement populations
Genus
Replacement level
Below replacement
Generational succession
Population projection
Population decrease
author_facet Robert Schoen
author_sort Robert Schoen
title The time to decline: tracing a cohort’s descendants in below replacement populations
title_short The time to decline: tracing a cohort’s descendants in below replacement populations
title_full The time to decline: tracing a cohort’s descendants in below replacement populations
title_fullStr The time to decline: tracing a cohort’s descendants in below replacement populations
title_full_unstemmed The time to decline: tracing a cohort’s descendants in below replacement populations
title_sort time to decline: tracing a cohort’s descendants in below replacement populations
publisher SpringerOpen
series Genus
issn 2035-5556
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Abstract A number of contemporary populations are exhibiting sustained fertility at levels substantially below long-term replacement. Nonetheless, relatively few populations are actually diminishing in size. Here, we approach that apparent paradox by analyzing the time before the number in a birth cohort, and its descendants, falls below the initial number in the cohort. First, models are examined with constant below replacement fertility, cohort extinction at age 75 or 85, and no mortality below the highest age attained. For a net reproduction rate (NRR) of 0.75, it takes 150 years for the cohort’s descendants to be fewer than the cohort’s original size if persons live to age 85, and over 130 years if persons live to age 75. If the NRR is at least 0.60, it takes a century before the descendants are fewer in number than the original cohort. Second, projections are done for the USA 2012, Italy 2012, and Hong Kong 2011 assuming that fertility and mortality remain constant. The results resemble the projections. For example, in Italy, with actual mortality and an NRR of 0.70, it takes over 125 years before the descendants of a cohort are fewer in number than the initial cohort. A relatively simple equation for the long term “time to decline” is presented, showing that it depends primarily on the level of fertility, secondarily on longevity, and only modestly on the mean age of fertility.
topic Replacement level
Below replacement
Generational succession
Population projection
Population decrease
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41118-018-0026-x
work_keys_str_mv AT robertschoen thetimetodeclinetracingacohortsdescendantsinbelowreplacementpopulations
AT robertschoen timetodeclinetracingacohortsdescendantsinbelowreplacementpopulations
_version_ 1725847450909933568