Standardization of tests of attention and inhibition

Aim: The aim of the study was to standardize tests of attention and inhibition for adults in the age range of 16–30 years, who had 1–10 years of formal education. The objectives were to develop normative data for the tests of attention and inhibition, to establish the reliability of the tests of att...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susan Thomas, Shobini L Rao, B Indira Devi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijpm.info/article.asp?issn=0253-7176;year=2016;volume=38;issue=4;spage=320;epage=325;aulast=Thomas
id doaj-f7edcc52776c4676a88f476c79c53d03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7edcc52776c4676a88f476c79c53d032021-08-02T05:14:56ZengSAGE PublishingIndian Journal of Psychological Medicine0253-71762016-01-0138432032510.4103/0253-7176.185959Standardization of tests of attention and inhibitionSusan ThomasShobini L RaoB Indira DeviAim: The aim of the study was to standardize tests of attention and inhibition for adults in the age range of 16–30 years, who had 1–10 years of formal education. The objectives were to develop normative data for the tests of attention and inhibition, to establish the reliability of the tests of attention and inhibition, and to establish the validity of the tests of attention and inhibition. Materials and Methods: The tests studied were figural visual scanning test (FVST), auditory target detection test (ATDT), stop signal test, and go/no-go (GNG) test. The four tests were given to a normal sample of 60 subjects (30 males and 30 females). Reliability of the tests was determined by retesting 20 individuals, (10 subjects from each group) from the sample after an interval of 1 month. The tests were given to a matched clinical sample of patients with unilateral focal lesions, and the results were compared to test discriminant validity. Means, standard deviations, t-test, correlations, and percentiles were used to analyze the data. Results and Conclusion: Results indicated that FVST and ATDT were reliable and valid tests of attention and stop signal test and GNG test were reliable and valid measures of inhibition of motor processes.http://www.ijpm.info/article.asp?issn=0253-7176;year=2016;volume=38;issue=4;spage=320;epage=325;aulast=ThomasAttentioninhibitionnormsreliabilitystandardizationvalidity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Susan Thomas
Shobini L Rao
B Indira Devi
spellingShingle Susan Thomas
Shobini L Rao
B Indira Devi
Standardization of tests of attention and inhibition
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
Attention
inhibition
norms
reliability
standardization
validity
author_facet Susan Thomas
Shobini L Rao
B Indira Devi
author_sort Susan Thomas
title Standardization of tests of attention and inhibition
title_short Standardization of tests of attention and inhibition
title_full Standardization of tests of attention and inhibition
title_fullStr Standardization of tests of attention and inhibition
title_full_unstemmed Standardization of tests of attention and inhibition
title_sort standardization of tests of attention and inhibition
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
issn 0253-7176
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Aim: The aim of the study was to standardize tests of attention and inhibition for adults in the age range of 16–30 years, who had 1–10 years of formal education. The objectives were to develop normative data for the tests of attention and inhibition, to establish the reliability of the tests of attention and inhibition, and to establish the validity of the tests of attention and inhibition. Materials and Methods: The tests studied were figural visual scanning test (FVST), auditory target detection test (ATDT), stop signal test, and go/no-go (GNG) test. The four tests were given to a normal sample of 60 subjects (30 males and 30 females). Reliability of the tests was determined by retesting 20 individuals, (10 subjects from each group) from the sample after an interval of 1 month. The tests were given to a matched clinical sample of patients with unilateral focal lesions, and the results were compared to test discriminant validity. Means, standard deviations, t-test, correlations, and percentiles were used to analyze the data. Results and Conclusion: Results indicated that FVST and ATDT were reliable and valid tests of attention and stop signal test and GNG test were reliable and valid measures of inhibition of motor processes.
topic Attention
inhibition
norms
reliability
standardization
validity
url http://www.ijpm.info/article.asp?issn=0253-7176;year=2016;volume=38;issue=4;spage=320;epage=325;aulast=Thomas
work_keys_str_mv AT susanthomas standardizationoftestsofattentionandinhibition
AT shobinilrao standardizationoftestsofattentionandinhibition
AT bindiradevi standardizationoftestsofattentionandinhibition
_version_ 1721241546420912128