Performance evaluation of Hindi speech recognition system using optimized filterbanks
An Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system implementation uses a conventional pattern recognition technique that stores a set of training patterns in classes and compares the test patterns with training patterns to place them in the best matched pattern class. Most state-of-the-art ASR systems use...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098617318281 |
id |
doaj-f7ebd574df9c418eaf95f6c50b0ce616 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f7ebd574df9c418eaf95f6c50b0ce6162020-11-25T02:24:45ZengElsevierEngineering Science and Technology, an International Journal2215-09862018-06-01213389398Performance evaluation of Hindi speech recognition system using optimized filterbanksMohit Dua0Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal1Mantosh Biswas2Corresponding author.; Department of Computer Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra, IndiaDepartment of Computer Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra, IndiaDepartment of Computer Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra, IndiaAn Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system implementation uses a conventional pattern recognition technique that stores a set of training patterns in classes and compares the test patterns with training patterns to place them in the best matched pattern class. Most state-of-the-art ASR systems use Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC) and Perceptual Linear Prediction (PLP) to extract features in training phase of the ASR system. However, sensitivity of MFCC & PLP to background noise has resulted in use of noise robust features Gammatone Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (GFCC) and Basilar-membrane Frequency-band Cepstral Coefficient (BFCC). But many issues associated with these feature extraction methods, like accepted bandwidth and standard number of filters are unresolved till date. This paper proposes a novel approach to use Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm to optimize the number and spacing of filters used in MFCC, GFCC and BFCC techniques. It also evaluates the performance of the said feature extraction methods with and without DE optimization in clean as well as in noisy environments. The results conclude that BFCC based ASR systems performs 0.4% to 1.0% better than GFCC and 7% to 10% better than MFCC in different conditions. Keywords: Automatic speech recognition, MFCC, GFCC, BFCC, Differential evolutionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098617318281 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mohit Dua Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal Mantosh Biswas |
spellingShingle |
Mohit Dua Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal Mantosh Biswas Performance evaluation of Hindi speech recognition system using optimized filterbanks Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal |
author_facet |
Mohit Dua Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal Mantosh Biswas |
author_sort |
Mohit Dua |
title |
Performance evaluation of Hindi speech recognition system using optimized filterbanks |
title_short |
Performance evaluation of Hindi speech recognition system using optimized filterbanks |
title_full |
Performance evaluation of Hindi speech recognition system using optimized filterbanks |
title_fullStr |
Performance evaluation of Hindi speech recognition system using optimized filterbanks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance evaluation of Hindi speech recognition system using optimized filterbanks |
title_sort |
performance evaluation of hindi speech recognition system using optimized filterbanks |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal |
issn |
2215-0986 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
An Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system implementation uses a conventional pattern recognition technique that stores a set of training patterns in classes and compares the test patterns with training patterns to place them in the best matched pattern class. Most state-of-the-art ASR systems use Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC) and Perceptual Linear Prediction (PLP) to extract features in training phase of the ASR system. However, sensitivity of MFCC & PLP to background noise has resulted in use of noise robust features Gammatone Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (GFCC) and Basilar-membrane Frequency-band Cepstral Coefficient (BFCC). But many issues associated with these feature extraction methods, like accepted bandwidth and standard number of filters are unresolved till date. This paper proposes a novel approach to use Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm to optimize the number and spacing of filters used in MFCC, GFCC and BFCC techniques. It also evaluates the performance of the said feature extraction methods with and without DE optimization in clean as well as in noisy environments. The results conclude that BFCC based ASR systems performs 0.4% to 1.0% better than GFCC and 7% to 10% better than MFCC in different conditions. Keywords: Automatic speech recognition, MFCC, GFCC, BFCC, Differential evolution |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098617318281 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mohitdua performanceevaluationofhindispeechrecognitionsystemusingoptimizedfilterbanks AT rajeshkumaraggarwal performanceevaluationofhindispeechrecognitionsystemusingoptimizedfilterbanks AT mantoshbiswas performanceevaluationofhindispeechrecognitionsystemusingoptimizedfilterbanks |
_version_ |
1724853615718301696 |