Pretreatment Systemic Inflammation Response Index in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as a Useful Prognostic Indicator

• Main Authors: Chen L, Kong X, Wang Z, Wang X, Fang Y, Wang J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dove Medical Press 2020-03-01
• Series: Cancer Management and Research
• Subjects: systemic inflammation response index (siri); breast cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; survival; prognosis
• Online Access: https://www.dovepress.com/pretreatment-systemic-inflammation-response-index-in-patients-with-bre-peer-reviewed-article-CMAR
• ISSN: 1179-1322

Li Chen, Xiangyi Kong, Zhongzhao Wang, Xiangyu Wang, Yi Fang, Jing Wang Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jing Wang; Yi FangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People’s Republic of ChinaEmail [e-mail]; [e-mail] and Objective: Systemic inflammation response index (SIRI=N×M/L), based on neutrophil (N), monocyte (M), and lymphocyte (L) counts, is used to predict the survival of patients with malignant tumors and can fully evaluate the balance between host immune and inflammatory condition. The present study is aimed to evaluate the potential prognostic significance of SIRI in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Subjects and Methods: A total of 262 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in this retrospective study. The optimal cutoff value of SIRI by receiver operating characteristic curve stratified patients into low SIRI (< 0.85× 109/L) group and high SIRI (≥ 0.85× 109/L) group. The associations between breast cancer and clinicopathological variables by SIRI were determined by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Kaplan–Meier plots and log-rank test were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the prognostic value of SIRI. The toxicity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was evaluated by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCICTC).Results: The results were shown that SIRI had prognostic significance by optimal cutoff value of 0.85× 109/L on DFS and OS in univariate and multivariate Cox regression survival analyses. Compared with patients who had high SIRI, patients with low SIRI had longer DFS and OS (41.27 vs 30.45 months, HR: 1.694, 95% CI: 1.128– 2.543, P=0.011; 52.86 vs 45.75 months, HR: 1.288, 95% CI: 0.781– 3.124, P=0.002, respectively). The patients with low SIRI had better 3-, 5-, and 10-year rates of DFS and OS than those with high SIRI. The common toxicities after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were hematologic and gastrointestinal reaction, and the SIRI had no significance on toxicities of all enrolled patients, excepted diarrhea. In patients without neural invasion, those with low SIRI had better prognosis and lower recurrence rates than those with high SIRI.Conclusion: Pretreatment SIRI with the advantage of repeatable, convenient, and non-invasive is a useful prognostic indicator for breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and is a promising biomarker for breast cancer on treatment strategy decisions.Keywords: systemic inflammation response index, SIRI, breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, survival, prognosis