Antimicrobial efficacy of commercially available endodontic bioceramic root canal sealers: A systematic review.
BACKGROUND:Recently, a new generation of bioceramic root canal sealers has been introduced onto the market. Many in vitro studies have investigated the antimicrobial properties of these sealers, but their comparative efficacy in antimicrobial activity is still unknown. METHODOLOGY:Three electronic d...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223575 |
id |
doaj-f7dd46bc655c4f0993be3e74ca4bc1ce |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f7dd46bc655c4f0993be3e74ca4bc1ce2021-03-03T21:11:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011410e022357510.1371/journal.pone.0223575Antimicrobial efficacy of commercially available endodontic bioceramic root canal sealers: A systematic review.Marija Šimundić MunitićTina Poklepović PeričićAna UtrobičićIvona BagoLivia PuljakBACKGROUND:Recently, a new generation of bioceramic root canal sealers has been introduced onto the market. Many in vitro studies have investigated the antimicrobial properties of these sealers, but their comparative efficacy in antimicrobial activity is still unknown. METHODOLOGY:Three electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE and Embase via the OvidSP platform, and Web of Science, up to June 25, 2019. Studies were included irrespective of study design, type of publication and language. Reporting quality was assessed by two authors independently. Meta-analysis was not performed due to studies being highly heterogeneous. RESULTS:We included 37 studies that analysed the antimicrobial effects of bioceramic sealers. Most of them used a planktonic cell model, with the exception of nine studies which used biofilms. It was not possible to make direct comparison of results from studies and to give a clear conclusion about the comparative antimicrobial activity of these materials because the studies used heterogeneous sources and ages of microorganisms, setting and contact times of sealers, and antimicrobial tests. Furthermore, some materials showed completely different results when tested with different methods. CONCLUSIONS:In conclusion, multiple in vitro studies have shown that bioceramic sealers may have various degrees of antimicrobial activity. However, it is still impossible to make conclusions about their comparative efficacy and to recommend the use of one over another in clinical practice because the studies available were conducted in different ways, which makes meta-analysis futile. A uniform methodological approach, consistent definitions and studies on humans are urgently needed in this field of research so that recommendations for practice can be made.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223575 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marija Šimundić Munitić Tina Poklepović Peričić Ana Utrobičić Ivona Bago Livia Puljak |
spellingShingle |
Marija Šimundić Munitić Tina Poklepović Peričić Ana Utrobičić Ivona Bago Livia Puljak Antimicrobial efficacy of commercially available endodontic bioceramic root canal sealers: A systematic review. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Marija Šimundić Munitić Tina Poklepović Peričić Ana Utrobičić Ivona Bago Livia Puljak |
author_sort |
Marija Šimundić Munitić |
title |
Antimicrobial efficacy of commercially available endodontic bioceramic root canal sealers: A systematic review. |
title_short |
Antimicrobial efficacy of commercially available endodontic bioceramic root canal sealers: A systematic review. |
title_full |
Antimicrobial efficacy of commercially available endodontic bioceramic root canal sealers: A systematic review. |
title_fullStr |
Antimicrobial efficacy of commercially available endodontic bioceramic root canal sealers: A systematic review. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antimicrobial efficacy of commercially available endodontic bioceramic root canal sealers: A systematic review. |
title_sort |
antimicrobial efficacy of commercially available endodontic bioceramic root canal sealers: a systematic review. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
BACKGROUND:Recently, a new generation of bioceramic root canal sealers has been introduced onto the market. Many in vitro studies have investigated the antimicrobial properties of these sealers, but their comparative efficacy in antimicrobial activity is still unknown. METHODOLOGY:Three electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE and Embase via the OvidSP platform, and Web of Science, up to June 25, 2019. Studies were included irrespective of study design, type of publication and language. Reporting quality was assessed by two authors independently. Meta-analysis was not performed due to studies being highly heterogeneous. RESULTS:We included 37 studies that analysed the antimicrobial effects of bioceramic sealers. Most of them used a planktonic cell model, with the exception of nine studies which used biofilms. It was not possible to make direct comparison of results from studies and to give a clear conclusion about the comparative antimicrobial activity of these materials because the studies used heterogeneous sources and ages of microorganisms, setting and contact times of sealers, and antimicrobial tests. Furthermore, some materials showed completely different results when tested with different methods. CONCLUSIONS:In conclusion, multiple in vitro studies have shown that bioceramic sealers may have various degrees of antimicrobial activity. However, it is still impossible to make conclusions about their comparative efficacy and to recommend the use of one over another in clinical practice because the studies available were conducted in different ways, which makes meta-analysis futile. A uniform methodological approach, consistent definitions and studies on humans are urgently needed in this field of research so that recommendations for practice can be made. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223575 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marijasimundicmunitic antimicrobialefficacyofcommerciallyavailableendodonticbioceramicrootcanalsealersasystematicreview AT tinapoklepovicpericic antimicrobialefficacyofcommerciallyavailableendodonticbioceramicrootcanalsealersasystematicreview AT anautrobicic antimicrobialefficacyofcommerciallyavailableendodonticbioceramicrootcanalsealersasystematicreview AT ivonabago antimicrobialefficacyofcommerciallyavailableendodonticbioceramicrootcanalsealersasystematicreview AT liviapuljak antimicrobialefficacyofcommerciallyavailableendodonticbioceramicrootcanalsealersasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1714818376882192384 |