Diagnostic Properties of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Tests

Serological assays emerged as complementary tools to RT-PCR in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 as well as being needed for epidemiological studies. This study aimed to assess the performance of a rapid test (RT) compared to that of serological tests using finger prick blood samples. A total of 183 sampl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suelen Basgalupp, Giovana dos Santos, Marina Bessel, Lara Garcia, Ana Carolina de Moura, Ana Carolina Rocha, Emerson Brito, Giovana de Miranda, Thayane Dornelles, William Dartora, Lucia Pellanda, Pedro Hallal, Eliana Wendland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/8/1441
id doaj-f7d3b9389e0c4539a79c3003fce3ae2c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7d3b9389e0c4539a79c3003fce3ae2c2021-08-26T13:40:24ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182021-08-01111441144110.3390/diagnostics11081441Diagnostic Properties of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody TestsSuelen Basgalupp0Giovana dos Santos1Marina Bessel2Lara Garcia3Ana Carolina de Moura4Ana Carolina Rocha5Emerson Brito6Giovana de Miranda7Thayane Dornelles8William Dartora9Lucia Pellanda10Pedro Hallal11Eliana Wendland12Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre 90035-000, RS, BrazilHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre 90035-000, RS, BrazilHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre 90035-000, RS, BrazilHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre 90035-000, RS, BrazilDepartment of Public Health, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde, de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050-170, RS, BrazilHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre 90035-000, RS, BrazilHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre 90035-000, RS, BrazilHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre 90035-000, RS, BrazilHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre 90035-000, RS, BrazilHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre 90035-000, RS, BrazilDepartment of Public Health, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde, de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90050-170, RS, BrazilPostgraduate Programme in Epidemiology, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas 96020-220, RS, BrazilHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre 90035-000, RS, BrazilSerological assays emerged as complementary tools to RT-PCR in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 as well as being needed for epidemiological studies. This study aimed to assess the performance of a rapid test (RT) compared to that of serological tests using finger prick blood samples. A total of 183 samples were evaluated, 88 of which were collected from individuals with negative RT-PCR and 95 from positive RT-PCR individuals. The diagnostic performance of RT (WONDFO<sup>®</sup>) and LUMIT (PROMEGA<sup>®</sup>) were compared to that of ELISA (EUROIMMUN<sup>®</sup>) for detecting antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 according to time from symptoms onset. The IgG antibody tests were detected in 77.4% (LUMIT), 77.9% (RT), and 80.0% (ELISA) of individuals. The detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 increases in accordance with increasing time from symptoms onset. Considering only time from symptoms onset >21 days, the positivity rate ranged from 81.8 to 97.0% between the three tests. The RT and LUMIT showed high agreement with ELISA (agreement = 91.5%, k = 0.83, and agreement = 96.3%, k = 0.9, respectively) in individuals who had symptoms 15 to 21 days before sample collection. Compared to that of the ELISA assay, our results show sensitivity ranged from 95% to 100% for IgG antibody detection in individuals with symptoms onset between 15 and 21 days before sample collection. The specificity was 100% in individuals with symptoms onset >15 days before serological tests. This study shows good performance and high level of agreement of three immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/8/1441SARS-CoV-2COVID-19serological testsantibodiespoint-of-care testELISA
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suelen Basgalupp
Giovana dos Santos
Marina Bessel
Lara Garcia
Ana Carolina de Moura
Ana Carolina Rocha
Emerson Brito
Giovana de Miranda
Thayane Dornelles
William Dartora
Lucia Pellanda
Pedro Hallal
Eliana Wendland
spellingShingle Suelen Basgalupp
Giovana dos Santos
Marina Bessel
Lara Garcia
Ana Carolina de Moura
Ana Carolina Rocha
Emerson Brito
Giovana de Miranda
Thayane Dornelles
William Dartora
Lucia Pellanda
Pedro Hallal
Eliana Wendland
Diagnostic Properties of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Tests
Diagnostics
SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
serological tests
antibodies
point-of-care test
ELISA
author_facet Suelen Basgalupp
Giovana dos Santos
Marina Bessel
Lara Garcia
Ana Carolina de Moura
Ana Carolina Rocha
Emerson Brito
Giovana de Miranda
Thayane Dornelles
William Dartora
Lucia Pellanda
Pedro Hallal
Eliana Wendland
author_sort Suelen Basgalupp
title Diagnostic Properties of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Tests
title_short Diagnostic Properties of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Tests
title_full Diagnostic Properties of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Tests
title_fullStr Diagnostic Properties of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Tests
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Properties of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Tests
title_sort diagnostic properties of three sars-cov-2 antibody tests
publisher MDPI AG
series Diagnostics
issn 2075-4418
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Serological assays emerged as complementary tools to RT-PCR in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 as well as being needed for epidemiological studies. This study aimed to assess the performance of a rapid test (RT) compared to that of serological tests using finger prick blood samples. A total of 183 samples were evaluated, 88 of which were collected from individuals with negative RT-PCR and 95 from positive RT-PCR individuals. The diagnostic performance of RT (WONDFO<sup>®</sup>) and LUMIT (PROMEGA<sup>®</sup>) were compared to that of ELISA (EUROIMMUN<sup>®</sup>) for detecting antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 according to time from symptoms onset. The IgG antibody tests were detected in 77.4% (LUMIT), 77.9% (RT), and 80.0% (ELISA) of individuals. The detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 increases in accordance with increasing time from symptoms onset. Considering only time from symptoms onset >21 days, the positivity rate ranged from 81.8 to 97.0% between the three tests. The RT and LUMIT showed high agreement with ELISA (agreement = 91.5%, k = 0.83, and agreement = 96.3%, k = 0.9, respectively) in individuals who had symptoms 15 to 21 days before sample collection. Compared to that of the ELISA assay, our results show sensitivity ranged from 95% to 100% for IgG antibody detection in individuals with symptoms onset between 15 and 21 days before sample collection. The specificity was 100% in individuals with symptoms onset >15 days before serological tests. This study shows good performance and high level of agreement of three immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.
topic SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
serological tests
antibodies
point-of-care test
ELISA
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/8/1441
work_keys_str_mv AT suelenbasgalupp diagnosticpropertiesofthreesarscov2antibodytests
AT giovanadossantos diagnosticpropertiesofthreesarscov2antibodytests
AT marinabessel diagnosticpropertiesofthreesarscov2antibodytests
AT laragarcia diagnosticpropertiesofthreesarscov2antibodytests
AT anacarolinademoura diagnosticpropertiesofthreesarscov2antibodytests
AT anacarolinarocha diagnosticpropertiesofthreesarscov2antibodytests
AT emersonbrito diagnosticpropertiesofthreesarscov2antibodytests
AT giovanademiranda diagnosticpropertiesofthreesarscov2antibodytests
AT thayanedornelles diagnosticpropertiesofthreesarscov2antibodytests
AT williamdartora diagnosticpropertiesofthreesarscov2antibodytests
AT luciapellanda diagnosticpropertiesofthreesarscov2antibodytests
AT pedrohallal diagnosticpropertiesofthreesarscov2antibodytests
AT elianawendland diagnosticpropertiesofthreesarscov2antibodytests
_version_ 1721194087375175680