Free-living turtles are a reservoir for Salmonella but not for Campylobacter.

Different studies have reported the prevalence of Salmonella in turtles and its role in reptile-associated salmonellosis in humans, but there is a lack of scientific literature related with the epidemiology of Campylobacter in turtles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Campylob...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clara Marin, Sofia Ingresa-Capaccioni, Sara González-Bodi, Francisco Marco-Jiménez, Santiago Vega
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23951312/?tool=EBI
id doaj-f7c2bbcf64ed4cfa80ddb09099b535f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7c2bbcf64ed4cfa80ddb09099b535f42021-03-03T23:01:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0188e7235010.1371/journal.pone.0072350Free-living turtles are a reservoir for Salmonella but not for Campylobacter.Clara MarinSofia Ingresa-CapaccioniSara González-BodiFrancisco Marco-JiménezSantiago VegaDifferent studies have reported the prevalence of Salmonella in turtles and its role in reptile-associated salmonellosis in humans, but there is a lack of scientific literature related with the epidemiology of Campylobacter in turtles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in free-living native (Emys orbicularis, n=83) and exotic (Trachemysscripta elegans, n=117) turtles from 11 natural ponds in Eastern Spain. In addition, different types of samples (cloacal swabs, intestinal content and water from Turtle containers) were compared. Regardless of the turtle species, natural ponds where individuals were captured and the type of sample taken, Campylobacter was not detected. Salmonella was isolated in similar proportions in native (8.0 ± 3.1%) and exotic (15.0 ± 3.3%) turtles (p=0.189). The prevalence of Salmonella positive turtles was associated with the natural ponds where animals were captured. Captured turtles from 8 of the 11 natural ponds were positive, ranged between 3.0 ± 3.1% and 60.0 ± 11.0%. Serotyping revealed 8 different serovars among four Salmonella enterica subspecies: S. enterica subsp. enterica (n = 21), S. enterica subsp. salamae (n = 2), S. enterica subsp. diarizonae (n = 3), and S. enterica subsp. houtenae (n = 1). Two serovars were predominant: S. Thompson (n=16) and S. typhimurium (n=3). In addition, there was an effect of sample type on Salmonella detection. The highest isolation of Salmonella was obtained from intestinal content samples (12.0 ± 3.0%), while lower percentages were found for water from the containers and cloacal swabs (8.0 ± 2.5% and 3.0 ± 1.5%, respectively). Our results imply that free-living turtles are a risk factor for Salmonella transmission, but do not seem to be a reservoir for Campylobacter. We therefore rule out turtles as a risk factor for human campylobacteriosis. Nevertheless, further studies should be undertaken in other countries to confirm these results.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23951312/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clara Marin
Sofia Ingresa-Capaccioni
Sara González-Bodi
Francisco Marco-Jiménez
Santiago Vega
spellingShingle Clara Marin
Sofia Ingresa-Capaccioni
Sara González-Bodi
Francisco Marco-Jiménez
Santiago Vega
Free-living turtles are a reservoir for Salmonella but not for Campylobacter.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Clara Marin
Sofia Ingresa-Capaccioni
Sara González-Bodi
Francisco Marco-Jiménez
Santiago Vega
author_sort Clara Marin
title Free-living turtles are a reservoir for Salmonella but not for Campylobacter.
title_short Free-living turtles are a reservoir for Salmonella but not for Campylobacter.
title_full Free-living turtles are a reservoir for Salmonella but not for Campylobacter.
title_fullStr Free-living turtles are a reservoir for Salmonella but not for Campylobacter.
title_full_unstemmed Free-living turtles are a reservoir for Salmonella but not for Campylobacter.
title_sort free-living turtles are a reservoir for salmonella but not for campylobacter.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Different studies have reported the prevalence of Salmonella in turtles and its role in reptile-associated salmonellosis in humans, but there is a lack of scientific literature related with the epidemiology of Campylobacter in turtles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in free-living native (Emys orbicularis, n=83) and exotic (Trachemysscripta elegans, n=117) turtles from 11 natural ponds in Eastern Spain. In addition, different types of samples (cloacal swabs, intestinal content and water from Turtle containers) were compared. Regardless of the turtle species, natural ponds where individuals were captured and the type of sample taken, Campylobacter was not detected. Salmonella was isolated in similar proportions in native (8.0 ± 3.1%) and exotic (15.0 ± 3.3%) turtles (p=0.189). The prevalence of Salmonella positive turtles was associated with the natural ponds where animals were captured. Captured turtles from 8 of the 11 natural ponds were positive, ranged between 3.0 ± 3.1% and 60.0 ± 11.0%. Serotyping revealed 8 different serovars among four Salmonella enterica subspecies: S. enterica subsp. enterica (n = 21), S. enterica subsp. salamae (n = 2), S. enterica subsp. diarizonae (n = 3), and S. enterica subsp. houtenae (n = 1). Two serovars were predominant: S. Thompson (n=16) and S. typhimurium (n=3). In addition, there was an effect of sample type on Salmonella detection. The highest isolation of Salmonella was obtained from intestinal content samples (12.0 ± 3.0%), while lower percentages were found for water from the containers and cloacal swabs (8.0 ± 2.5% and 3.0 ± 1.5%, respectively). Our results imply that free-living turtles are a risk factor for Salmonella transmission, but do not seem to be a reservoir for Campylobacter. We therefore rule out turtles as a risk factor for human campylobacteriosis. Nevertheless, further studies should be undertaken in other countries to confirm these results.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23951312/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT claramarin freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter
AT sofiaingresacapaccioni freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter
AT saragonzalezbodi freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter
AT franciscomarcojimenez freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter
AT santiagovega freelivingturtlesareareservoirforsalmonellabutnotforcampylobacter
_version_ 1714811957276573696