When Does Rejection Trigger Aggression? A Test of the Multimotive Model

Research has sought to identify the conditions under which rejection leads to retaliation. The Multimotive Model (MMM) proposes that there are three primary behavioral responses to rejection: prosocial (e.g., befriending others), asocial (e.g., withdrawal), and antisocial behavior (e.g., aggression...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megan Stubbs-Richardson, H. Colleen Sinclair, Ben Porter, Jessica Weiss Utley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660973/full
id doaj-f7c0b3f2b6ae48d995e3c996edb6ab3d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7c0b3f2b6ae48d995e3c996edb6ab3d2021-06-25T04:40:46ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-06-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.660973660973When Does Rejection Trigger Aggression? A Test of the Multimotive ModelMegan Stubbs-Richardson0H. Colleen Sinclair1Ben Porter2Jessica Weiss Utley3Social Science Research Center, Data Science for the Social Sciences Laboratory, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United StatesSocial Science Research Center, Social Relations Collaborative, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United StatesSocial Science Research Center, Data Science for the Social Sciences Laboratory, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United StatesSocial Science Research Center, Social Relations Collaborative, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United StatesResearch has sought to identify the conditions under which rejection leads to retaliation. The Multimotive Model (MMM) proposes that there are three primary behavioral responses to rejection: prosocial (e.g., befriending others), asocial (e.g., withdrawal), and antisocial behavior (e.g., aggression toward others). In this study, we conducted the first full test of the MMM as well as expanded the model. Based on research linking aggression and “perceived groupness,” construal items were added assessing whether the rejection was perceived as extending beyond the individual to one's peers. We also included self-harm behavioral responses as this outcome was not sufficiently captured by existing antisocial or asocial operationalizations. This expanded model was then tested with two high school student samples (Ns of 231 and 374) who reported experiencing aggressive rejection (i.e., experienced physical, verbal, relational, or cyber aggression from peers). The MMM was compared to a saturated model separately in each of the two datasets using structural equation modeling. Results indicate that the saturated model provides a better fit for the data than the MMM across all models examined (all p < 0.001). In part, this is due to certain paths having different associations than hypothesized. For example, perceiving the rejection as carrying a higher cost was predicted to promote prosocial behavior, where instead it predicted asocial responses. Perceived groupness was the strongest predictor of antisocial responses. Self-harm outcomes were significantly and consistently associated with higher perceived costs across the models. These results and others will be discussed in the context of how we can better encourage prosocial and discourage antisocial and self-harm responses to social rejection, including bullying.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660973/fullbullyingrejectionaggressionprosocial behaviorantisocial behaviorasocial behavior
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Megan Stubbs-Richardson
H. Colleen Sinclair
Ben Porter
Jessica Weiss Utley
spellingShingle Megan Stubbs-Richardson
H. Colleen Sinclair
Ben Porter
Jessica Weiss Utley
When Does Rejection Trigger Aggression? A Test of the Multimotive Model
Frontiers in Psychology
bullying
rejection
aggression
prosocial behavior
antisocial behavior
asocial behavior
author_facet Megan Stubbs-Richardson
H. Colleen Sinclair
Ben Porter
Jessica Weiss Utley
author_sort Megan Stubbs-Richardson
title When Does Rejection Trigger Aggression? A Test of the Multimotive Model
title_short When Does Rejection Trigger Aggression? A Test of the Multimotive Model
title_full When Does Rejection Trigger Aggression? A Test of the Multimotive Model
title_fullStr When Does Rejection Trigger Aggression? A Test of the Multimotive Model
title_full_unstemmed When Does Rejection Trigger Aggression? A Test of the Multimotive Model
title_sort when does rejection trigger aggression? a test of the multimotive model
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Research has sought to identify the conditions under which rejection leads to retaliation. The Multimotive Model (MMM) proposes that there are three primary behavioral responses to rejection: prosocial (e.g., befriending others), asocial (e.g., withdrawal), and antisocial behavior (e.g., aggression toward others). In this study, we conducted the first full test of the MMM as well as expanded the model. Based on research linking aggression and “perceived groupness,” construal items were added assessing whether the rejection was perceived as extending beyond the individual to one's peers. We also included self-harm behavioral responses as this outcome was not sufficiently captured by existing antisocial or asocial operationalizations. This expanded model was then tested with two high school student samples (Ns of 231 and 374) who reported experiencing aggressive rejection (i.e., experienced physical, verbal, relational, or cyber aggression from peers). The MMM was compared to a saturated model separately in each of the two datasets using structural equation modeling. Results indicate that the saturated model provides a better fit for the data than the MMM across all models examined (all p < 0.001). In part, this is due to certain paths having different associations than hypothesized. For example, perceiving the rejection as carrying a higher cost was predicted to promote prosocial behavior, where instead it predicted asocial responses. Perceived groupness was the strongest predictor of antisocial responses. Self-harm outcomes were significantly and consistently associated with higher perceived costs across the models. These results and others will be discussed in the context of how we can better encourage prosocial and discourage antisocial and self-harm responses to social rejection, including bullying.
topic bullying
rejection
aggression
prosocial behavior
antisocial behavior
asocial behavior
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660973/full
work_keys_str_mv AT meganstubbsrichardson whendoesrejectiontriggeraggressionatestofthemultimotivemodel
AT hcolleensinclair whendoesrejectiontriggeraggressionatestofthemultimotivemodel
AT benporter whendoesrejectiontriggeraggressionatestofthemultimotivemodel
AT jessicaweissutley whendoesrejectiontriggeraggressionatestofthemultimotivemodel
_version_ 1721360813434863616