TAPing into the interpreting process: Using participant reports to inform the interpreting process

• Main Authors: Debra Russell, Betsy Winston
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Western Sydney University 2014-04-01
• Series: Translation and Interpreting : the International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research
• Subjects: educational interpreting; think aloud protocols; stimulated recalls; interpreters; american sign language; teacher intent; goals; classroom; student need; interpreting processing; role; intent; preparation; linguistic
• Online Access: http://www.trans-int.org/index.php/transint/article/view/315/153

This article presents the results of a Canadian study that examined the correlation of verbal reporting processes and the quality of interpretation. Two types of verbal reports, Think Aloud Protocols (TAPs) and Stimulated Recalls (SRs), were collected and analyzed to explore how TAPS and SRs might reflect the quality of interpreting provided in educational settings and therefore be potential tools for improving interpreting education strategies. Twelve interpreters working in educational contexts were recruited to participate in a multi-stage research process. Each interpreter was asked to perform a Think Aloud while viewing a sample of classroom discourse in preparation for interpreting it. Each interpreter then provided an interpretation, followed by a post-interpreting Stimulated Recall review of the interpretation. The standardized samples chosen were based on videotaped authentic classroom instruction and represented classes at the elementary, middle school and high school levels. A Deaf child was described for each level of interpreting so that the interpreters could target their interpretation. The results showed that those interpreters who demonstrated higher order cognitive thinking skills and attended to teacher intent and student language preferences provided more effective interpreting than the interpreters who focused primarily on linguistic choices and interpreting decisions. The findings have implications for interpreters, interpreter educators and mentors, and teachers working with interpreters and Deaf students in mediated learning environments. By exploring the ways in which attention to discourse features and teacher-student needs could be heightened, interpreters could enhance the quality of interpretation provided to Deaf learners. Finally, questions for future research and implications for collaboration across countries are discussed.