How accurate is the ‘Surprise Question’ at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Clinicians are inaccurate at predicting survival. The ‘Surprise Question’ (SQ) is a screening tool that aims to identify people nearing the end of life. Potentially, its routine use could help identify patients who might benefit from palliative care services. The objective was to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicola White, Nuriye Kupeli, Victoria Vickerstaff, Patrick Stone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-08-01
Series:BMC Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-017-0907-4
id doaj-f7b33f2791f34bf39e98f3f6b0363310
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7b33f2791f34bf39e98f3f6b03633102020-11-24T21:10:27ZengBMCBMC Medicine1741-70152017-08-0115111410.1186/s12916-017-0907-4How accurate is the ‘Surprise Question’ at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysisNicola White0Nuriye Kupeli1Victoria Vickerstaff2Patrick Stone3Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College LondonMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College LondonMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College LondonMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College LondonAbstract Background Clinicians are inaccurate at predicting survival. The ‘Surprise Question’ (SQ) is a screening tool that aims to identify people nearing the end of life. Potentially, its routine use could help identify patients who might benefit from palliative care services. The objective was to assess the accuracy of the SQ by time scale, clinician, and speciality. Methods Searches were completed on Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, Science Citation Index, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Open Grey literature (all from inception to November 2016). Studies were included if they reported the SQ and were written in English. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results A total of 26 papers were included in the review, of which 22 reported a complete data set. There were 25,718 predictions of survival made in response to the SQ. The c-statistic of the SQ ranged from 0.512 to 0.822. In the meta-analysis, the pooled accuracy level was 74.8% (95% CI 68.6–80.5). There was a negligible difference in timescale of the SQ. Doctors appeared to be more accurate than nurses at recognising people in the last year of life (c-statistic = 0.735 vs. 0.688), and the SQ seemed more accurate in an oncology setting 76.1% (95% CI 69.7–86.3). Conclusions There was a wide degree of accuracy, from poor to reasonable, reported across studies using the SQ. Further work investigating how the SQ could be used alongside other prognostic tools to increase the identification of people who would benefit from palliative care is warranted. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42016046564 .http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-017-0907-4Surprise questionAccuracyPrognosisEnd of lifePalliative careSurvival
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicola White
Nuriye Kupeli
Victoria Vickerstaff
Patrick Stone
spellingShingle Nicola White
Nuriye Kupeli
Victoria Vickerstaff
Patrick Stone
How accurate is the ‘Surprise Question’ at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis
BMC Medicine
Surprise question
Accuracy
Prognosis
End of life
Palliative care
Survival
author_facet Nicola White
Nuriye Kupeli
Victoria Vickerstaff
Patrick Stone
author_sort Nicola White
title How accurate is the ‘Surprise Question’ at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short How accurate is the ‘Surprise Question’ at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full How accurate is the ‘Surprise Question’ at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr How accurate is the ‘Surprise Question’ at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed How accurate is the ‘Surprise Question’ at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort how accurate is the ‘surprise question’ at identifying patients at the end of life? a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Medicine
issn 1741-7015
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Abstract Background Clinicians are inaccurate at predicting survival. The ‘Surprise Question’ (SQ) is a screening tool that aims to identify people nearing the end of life. Potentially, its routine use could help identify patients who might benefit from palliative care services. The objective was to assess the accuracy of the SQ by time scale, clinician, and speciality. Methods Searches were completed on Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, Science Citation Index, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Open Grey literature (all from inception to November 2016). Studies were included if they reported the SQ and were written in English. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results A total of 26 papers were included in the review, of which 22 reported a complete data set. There were 25,718 predictions of survival made in response to the SQ. The c-statistic of the SQ ranged from 0.512 to 0.822. In the meta-analysis, the pooled accuracy level was 74.8% (95% CI 68.6–80.5). There was a negligible difference in timescale of the SQ. Doctors appeared to be more accurate than nurses at recognising people in the last year of life (c-statistic = 0.735 vs. 0.688), and the SQ seemed more accurate in an oncology setting 76.1% (95% CI 69.7–86.3). Conclusions There was a wide degree of accuracy, from poor to reasonable, reported across studies using the SQ. Further work investigating how the SQ could be used alongside other prognostic tools to increase the identification of people who would benefit from palliative care is warranted. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42016046564 .
topic Surprise question
Accuracy
Prognosis
End of life
Palliative care
Survival
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-017-0907-4
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolawhite howaccurateisthesurprisequestionatidentifyingpatientsattheendoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nuriyekupeli howaccurateisthesurprisequestionatidentifyingpatientsattheendoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT victoriavickerstaff howaccurateisthesurprisequestionatidentifyingpatientsattheendoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT patrickstone howaccurateisthesurprisequestionatidentifyingpatientsattheendoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1716756504764219392