Intense or spatially heterogeneous predation can select against prey dispersal.

Dispersal theory generally predicts kin competition, inbreeding, and temporal variation in habitat quality should select for dispersal, whereas spatial variation in habitat quality should select against dispersal. The effect of predation on the evolution of dispersal is currently not well-known: bec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frederic Barraquand, David J Murrell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3256147?pdf=render
id doaj-f7a5d6de4de940a1a75f9328adce13ca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7a5d6de4de940a1a75f9328adce13ca2020-11-25T01:25:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0171e2892410.1371/journal.pone.0028924Intense or spatially heterogeneous predation can select against prey dispersal.Frederic BarraquandDavid J MurrellDispersal theory generally predicts kin competition, inbreeding, and temporal variation in habitat quality should select for dispersal, whereas spatial variation in habitat quality should select against dispersal. The effect of predation on the evolution of dispersal is currently not well-known: because predation can be variable in both space and time, it is not clear whether or when predation will promote dispersal within prey. Moreover, the evolution of prey dispersal affects strongly the encounter rate of predator and prey individuals, which greatly determines the ecological dynamics, and in turn changes the selection pressures for prey dispersal, in an eco-evolutionary feedback loop. When taken all together the effect of predation on prey dispersal is rather difficult to predict. We analyze a spatially explicit, individual-based predator-prey model and its mathematical approximation to investigate the evolution of prey dispersal. Competition and predation depend on local, rather than landscape-scale densities, and the spatial pattern of predation corresponds well to that of predators using restricted home ranges (e.g. central-place foragers). Analyses show the balance between the level of competition and predation pressure an individual is expected to experience determines whether prey should disperse or stay close to their parents and siblings, and more predation selects for less prey dispersal. Predators with smaller home ranges also select for less prey dispersal; more prey dispersal is favoured if predators have large home ranges, are very mobile, and/or are evenly distributed across the landscape.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3256147?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frederic Barraquand
David J Murrell
spellingShingle Frederic Barraquand
David J Murrell
Intense or spatially heterogeneous predation can select against prey dispersal.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Frederic Barraquand
David J Murrell
author_sort Frederic Barraquand
title Intense or spatially heterogeneous predation can select against prey dispersal.
title_short Intense or spatially heterogeneous predation can select against prey dispersal.
title_full Intense or spatially heterogeneous predation can select against prey dispersal.
title_fullStr Intense or spatially heterogeneous predation can select against prey dispersal.
title_full_unstemmed Intense or spatially heterogeneous predation can select against prey dispersal.
title_sort intense or spatially heterogeneous predation can select against prey dispersal.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Dispersal theory generally predicts kin competition, inbreeding, and temporal variation in habitat quality should select for dispersal, whereas spatial variation in habitat quality should select against dispersal. The effect of predation on the evolution of dispersal is currently not well-known: because predation can be variable in both space and time, it is not clear whether or when predation will promote dispersal within prey. Moreover, the evolution of prey dispersal affects strongly the encounter rate of predator and prey individuals, which greatly determines the ecological dynamics, and in turn changes the selection pressures for prey dispersal, in an eco-evolutionary feedback loop. When taken all together the effect of predation on prey dispersal is rather difficult to predict. We analyze a spatially explicit, individual-based predator-prey model and its mathematical approximation to investigate the evolution of prey dispersal. Competition and predation depend on local, rather than landscape-scale densities, and the spatial pattern of predation corresponds well to that of predators using restricted home ranges (e.g. central-place foragers). Analyses show the balance between the level of competition and predation pressure an individual is expected to experience determines whether prey should disperse or stay close to their parents and siblings, and more predation selects for less prey dispersal. Predators with smaller home ranges also select for less prey dispersal; more prey dispersal is favoured if predators have large home ranges, are very mobile, and/or are evenly distributed across the landscape.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3256147?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT fredericbarraquand intenseorspatiallyheterogeneouspredationcanselectagainstpreydispersal
AT davidjmurrell intenseorspatiallyheterogeneouspredationcanselectagainstpreydispersal
_version_ 1725115507352272896