Regulation as a policy contest: the probability of conservation of a renewable resource

How do the levels of extreme positions of various interest groups influence the conservation policies in the context of a renewable resource conservation contest? To answer this question, a model is provided where conservation policy is determined as a contest between two opposing interest groups: o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Urs Steiner Brandt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives" 2017-10-01
Series:Environmental Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/9231/EE_2017_03cont._Brandt.pdf
id doaj-f7a40a123d92420e907f11454166c0ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7a40a123d92420e907f11454166c0ea2020-11-24T21:02:14ZengLLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"Environmental Economics1998-60411998-605X2017-10-01839210110.21511/ee.08(3-1).2017.019231Regulation as a policy contest: the probability of conservation of a renewable resourceUrs Steiner Brandt0Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Environmental and Business Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Campus EsbjergHow do the levels of extreme positions of various interest groups influence the conservation policies in the context of a renewable resource conservation contest? To answer this question, a model is provided where conservation policy is determined as a contest between two opposing interest groups: one in favor of conservation and another in favor of non-conservation. The levels of extreme positions for the conservationalists are determined by their demands about the severity of the conservation strategy that needs to be implemented. For the non-conservation group, the level of extreme position is determined by how large the current harvest of the resource should be. The main driver of the model is that resource conservation is realized only if the conservation group wins the contest, which again depends on the relative gain the two contenders receive when winning the contest. The paper derives conditions where the more extreme positioned groups will have less likelihood of succeeding, e.g., a conservation group demanding larger conservation efforts will face a reduced probability that actual conservation policies will be implemented.https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/9231/EE_2017_03cont._Brandt.pdfenvironmental degradationextreme positionspolitical contestprobability of conservationresource management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Urs Steiner Brandt
spellingShingle Urs Steiner Brandt
Regulation as a policy contest: the probability of conservation of a renewable resource
Environmental Economics
environmental degradation
extreme positions
political contest
probability of conservation
resource management
author_facet Urs Steiner Brandt
author_sort Urs Steiner Brandt
title Regulation as a policy contest: the probability of conservation of a renewable resource
title_short Regulation as a policy contest: the probability of conservation of a renewable resource
title_full Regulation as a policy contest: the probability of conservation of a renewable resource
title_fullStr Regulation as a policy contest: the probability of conservation of a renewable resource
title_full_unstemmed Regulation as a policy contest: the probability of conservation of a renewable resource
title_sort regulation as a policy contest: the probability of conservation of a renewable resource
publisher LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"
series Environmental Economics
issn 1998-6041
1998-605X
publishDate 2017-10-01
description How do the levels of extreme positions of various interest groups influence the conservation policies in the context of a renewable resource conservation contest? To answer this question, a model is provided where conservation policy is determined as a contest between two opposing interest groups: one in favor of conservation and another in favor of non-conservation. The levels of extreme positions for the conservationalists are determined by their demands about the severity of the conservation strategy that needs to be implemented. For the non-conservation group, the level of extreme position is determined by how large the current harvest of the resource should be. The main driver of the model is that resource conservation is realized only if the conservation group wins the contest, which again depends on the relative gain the two contenders receive when winning the contest. The paper derives conditions where the more extreme positioned groups will have less likelihood of succeeding, e.g., a conservation group demanding larger conservation efforts will face a reduced probability that actual conservation policies will be implemented.
topic environmental degradation
extreme positions
political contest
probability of conservation
resource management
url https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/9231/EE_2017_03cont._Brandt.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT urssteinerbrandt regulationasapolicycontesttheprobabilityofconservationofarenewableresource
_version_ 1716776120186044416