On the native/nonnative speaker notion and World Englishes: Debating with K. Rajagopalan

ABSTRACT In a series of three articles published in the Journal of Pragmatics (1995, henceforth JP), the purpose of the papers is to question the division of English spoken in the world into, on one hand, "native" varieties (British English, American English. Australian English) and, on th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Robert SCHMITZ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Series:DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-44502016000300597&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-f76bf3740faa4930916451add0ae0379
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f76bf3740faa4930916451add0ae03792020-11-24T23:37:19ZengPontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloDELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada1678-460X32359761110.1590/0102-445083626175745488S0102-44502016000300597On the native/nonnative speaker notion and World Englishes: Debating with K. RajagopalanJohn Robert SCHMITZABSTRACT In a series of three articles published in the Journal of Pragmatics (1995, henceforth JP), the purpose of the papers is to question the division of English spoken in the world into, on one hand, "native" varieties (British English, American English. Australian English) and, on the other, "new/nonnative" varieties (Indian English, Singaporean English, Nigerian English). The JP articles are indeed groundbreaking for they mark one of the first interactions among scholars from the East with researchers in the West with regard to the growth and spread of the language as well as the roles English is made to play by its impressive number of users. The privileged position of prestige and power attributed to the inner circle varieties (USA, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) is questioned. Rajagopalan (1997, motivated by his reading of the JP papers, adds another dimension to this questioning by pointing to the racial and discriminatory stance underlying the notions "native speaker" and "nonnative speaker" (henceforth, respectively NS and NNS). Rajagopalan has written extensively on the issue of nativity or "nativeness"; over the years, Schmitz has also written on the same topic. There appears, in some cases, to be a number of divergent views with regard to subject on hand on the part of both authors. The purpose of this article is to engage in a respectful debate to uncover misreading and possible misunderstanding on the part of Schmitz. Listening to one another and learning from each another are essential in all academic endeavors.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-44502016000300597&lng=en&tlng=ennative speakernon-native speakernationalismracial discrimination
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Robert SCHMITZ
spellingShingle John Robert SCHMITZ
On the native/nonnative speaker notion and World Englishes: Debating with K. Rajagopalan
DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
native speaker
non-native speaker
nationalism
racial discrimination
author_facet John Robert SCHMITZ
author_sort John Robert SCHMITZ
title On the native/nonnative speaker notion and World Englishes: Debating with K. Rajagopalan
title_short On the native/nonnative speaker notion and World Englishes: Debating with K. Rajagopalan
title_full On the native/nonnative speaker notion and World Englishes: Debating with K. Rajagopalan
title_fullStr On the native/nonnative speaker notion and World Englishes: Debating with K. Rajagopalan
title_full_unstemmed On the native/nonnative speaker notion and World Englishes: Debating with K. Rajagopalan
title_sort on the native/nonnative speaker notion and world englishes: debating with k. rajagopalan
publisher Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
series DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
issn 1678-460X
description ABSTRACT In a series of three articles published in the Journal of Pragmatics (1995, henceforth JP), the purpose of the papers is to question the division of English spoken in the world into, on one hand, "native" varieties (British English, American English. Australian English) and, on the other, "new/nonnative" varieties (Indian English, Singaporean English, Nigerian English). The JP articles are indeed groundbreaking for they mark one of the first interactions among scholars from the East with researchers in the West with regard to the growth and spread of the language as well as the roles English is made to play by its impressive number of users. The privileged position of prestige and power attributed to the inner circle varieties (USA, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) is questioned. Rajagopalan (1997, motivated by his reading of the JP papers, adds another dimension to this questioning by pointing to the racial and discriminatory stance underlying the notions "native speaker" and "nonnative speaker" (henceforth, respectively NS and NNS). Rajagopalan has written extensively on the issue of nativity or "nativeness"; over the years, Schmitz has also written on the same topic. There appears, in some cases, to be a number of divergent views with regard to subject on hand on the part of both authors. The purpose of this article is to engage in a respectful debate to uncover misreading and possible misunderstanding on the part of Schmitz. Listening to one another and learning from each another are essential in all academic endeavors.
topic native speaker
non-native speaker
nationalism
racial discrimination
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-44502016000300597&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT johnrobertschmitz onthenativenonnativespeakernotionandworldenglishesdebatingwithkrajagopalan
_version_ 1725520457514352640