| Summary: | Introduction. At the stage of Ukraine’s accession to the European Union, the experience of forming the system of personnel management in different countries of the world is of great importance to us and serves as an example. Therefore, in this publication features of different systems of personnel management are considered and their comparison is carried out.
Purpose. Study of the features of Japanese, American and European HR systems and their comparative characteristics.
Results. Different systems of personnel management are considered. In particular, the Japanese system, the main features of which are: long-term or life-long hiring; combining professions; collectivism; compulsory participation in intra-firm trade unions, continuous learning, collective decision-making and responsibility, increased attention to personality.
Also, the American system of personnel management, features of which are: individualism; orientation to narrow specialization; high professionalism; mobility; risk aversion; individual decision making and responsibility; secondary attention to a person as a person.
The study of the European Personnel Management System shows that European companies support collective work of personnel under the strict management of the manager, create conditions for the implementation of creative abilities of employees and support the healthy moral and psychological climate in the team.
The comparative characteristics of these management systems have shown that the Japanese and American systems are different from each other, and in turn, European – combines certain features of the other two.
Conclusions. Only an integrated approach with the use of modern foreign experience will allow to optimize the mechanisms of implementation of the process of formation and development of personnel at domestic enterprises and to ensure its greater efficiency. For each Ukrainian enterprise, depending on size, form of ownership, composition, should develop its own model of personnel management system, which will be combined with the features of one of the world’s systems of personnel management of the enterprise and take into account our national traditions.
|
|---|
