Two epochal turns of inequality, their significance, and their dynamics
Abstract At the end of the twentieth century, two historical turns of economic inequality happened. Among the developed countries of the Global North, the secular trend of decreasing intra-national inequality turned into its opposite. At about the same time, the long period of global inequality bega...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2021-03-01
|
Series: | The Journal of Chinese Sociology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-021-00143-0 |
id |
doaj-f75c1bb1990f4276ab45a6de831f6035 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f75c1bb1990f4276ab45a6de831f60352021-03-28T11:10:07ZengSpringerOpenThe Journal of Chinese Sociology2198-26352021-03-018111810.1186/s40711-021-00143-0Two epochal turns of inequality, their significance, and their dynamicsGöran Therborn0The Old Schools, University of CambridgeAbstract At the end of the twentieth century, two historical turns of economic inequality happened. Among the developed countries of the Global North, the secular trend of decreasing intra-national inequality turned into its opposite. At about the same time, the long period of global inequality began to bend down, among households as well as among nations, a turn less noticed but more significant than the reduction of extreme poverty in the South. The foundation of the former turn was the beginning of de-industrialization in the North, and the coming of a post-industrial society, very different from the one predicted. The paper analyzes the trigger of the turn and the central dynamics of the new inequality in the rich North, financialization, and the digital revolution. It then tries to answer two questions about the global turn: Was the decline of global inequality causally connected to the increase of Northern intra-national inequality? Will there be a development of industrial societies in the South? The answer to both is no. What lies ahead is more likely a global convergence of intra-national unequalization, albeit with both different and similar dynamics, as the decline of extreme poverty in the South is leading to inequality increases comparable to those of the North. Post-industrialism has no egalitarian dialectic like that of industrial capitalism, but the dynamics of the twenty-first century inequality are likely to be confronted not only with popular protest movements but also with an emergent scholarly and intellectual Egalitarian Enlightenment.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-021-00143-0InequalityDe-industrializationPost-industrial societyPovertyFinancialization |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Göran Therborn |
spellingShingle |
Göran Therborn Two epochal turns of inequality, their significance, and their dynamics The Journal of Chinese Sociology Inequality De-industrialization Post-industrial society Poverty Financialization |
author_facet |
Göran Therborn |
author_sort |
Göran Therborn |
title |
Two epochal turns of inequality, their significance, and their dynamics |
title_short |
Two epochal turns of inequality, their significance, and their dynamics |
title_full |
Two epochal turns of inequality, their significance, and their dynamics |
title_fullStr |
Two epochal turns of inequality, their significance, and their dynamics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Two epochal turns of inequality, their significance, and their dynamics |
title_sort |
two epochal turns of inequality, their significance, and their dynamics |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
The Journal of Chinese Sociology |
issn |
2198-2635 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Abstract At the end of the twentieth century, two historical turns of economic inequality happened. Among the developed countries of the Global North, the secular trend of decreasing intra-national inequality turned into its opposite. At about the same time, the long period of global inequality began to bend down, among households as well as among nations, a turn less noticed but more significant than the reduction of extreme poverty in the South. The foundation of the former turn was the beginning of de-industrialization in the North, and the coming of a post-industrial society, very different from the one predicted. The paper analyzes the trigger of the turn and the central dynamics of the new inequality in the rich North, financialization, and the digital revolution. It then tries to answer two questions about the global turn: Was the decline of global inequality causally connected to the increase of Northern intra-national inequality? Will there be a development of industrial societies in the South? The answer to both is no. What lies ahead is more likely a global convergence of intra-national unequalization, albeit with both different and similar dynamics, as the decline of extreme poverty in the South is leading to inequality increases comparable to those of the North. Post-industrialism has no egalitarian dialectic like that of industrial capitalism, but the dynamics of the twenty-first century inequality are likely to be confronted not only with popular protest movements but also with an emergent scholarly and intellectual Egalitarian Enlightenment. |
topic |
Inequality De-industrialization Post-industrial society Poverty Financialization |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-021-00143-0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gorantherborn twoepochalturnsofinequalitytheirsignificanceandtheirdynamics |
_version_ |
1724200438822076416 |