On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape

Introduction: This study explores the feasibility of SRS/SRT treatment with MLC leaves wider than 2.5 mm at isocenter by inter-comparing treatment plans produced with 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm leaves for various target sizes and shapes.Materials and methods: Forty previously treated patients were re-pla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wassim Jalbout, Jana Abou Zahr, Bassem Youssef, Bilal Shahine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
SRS
SRT
MLC
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.00741/full
id doaj-f74727a0a5f24f3faac7d37fa2912c95
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f74727a0a5f24f3faac7d37fa2912c952020-11-25T00:31:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2019-08-01910.3389/fonc.2019.00741472469On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and ShapeWassim JalboutJana Abou ZahrBassem YoussefBilal ShahineIntroduction: This study explores the feasibility of SRS/SRT treatment with MLC leaves wider than 2.5 mm at isocenter by inter-comparing treatment plans produced with 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm leaves for various target sizes and shapes.Materials and methods: Forty previously treated patients were re-planned using 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm wide MLC leaves. For each patient, all three plans were evaluated and contrasted between them in terms of five metrics: target dose homogeneity, conformity index, organs at risk dose, dose fall off outside the target, and dose to normal tissues. A regularity index RI was introduced that quantified the degree of target shape irregularity. The effect of target size and shape irregularity on feasibility of 5.0 and 10.0 mm leaves was analyzed.Results: Consistent plan degradation was observed for 10.0 mm (sometimes for 5.0 mm) compared to 2.5 mm MLC in terms of the above five plan metrics, but this degradation was small to clinically insignificant. As an exception, when target (PTV) size was smaller than about 1 cm diameter, clinically significant differences were found between 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm MLC.Conclusion: 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC can be used in SRS/SRT for targets (PTV) diameter larger than 1 cm. For smaller targets, 2.5 mm MLC is clinically superior, 5.0 is acceptable and 10.0 mm MLC is discouraged in terms of PTV dose conformity.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.00741/fullSRSSRTradiosurgeryMLCmultileaf collimatorsleaf width
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wassim Jalbout
Jana Abou Zahr
Bassem Youssef
Bilal Shahine
spellingShingle Wassim Jalbout
Jana Abou Zahr
Bassem Youssef
Bilal Shahine
On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape
Frontiers in Oncology
SRS
SRT
radiosurgery
MLC
multileaf collimators
leaf width
author_facet Wassim Jalbout
Jana Abou Zahr
Bassem Youssef
Bilal Shahine
author_sort Wassim Jalbout
title On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape
title_short On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape
title_full On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape
title_fullStr On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape
title_full_unstemmed On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape
title_sort on the feasibility of stereotactic radiosurgery with 5.0 and 10.0 mm mlc leaves as a function of target size and shape
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Introduction: This study explores the feasibility of SRS/SRT treatment with MLC leaves wider than 2.5 mm at isocenter by inter-comparing treatment plans produced with 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm leaves for various target sizes and shapes.Materials and methods: Forty previously treated patients were re-planned using 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm wide MLC leaves. For each patient, all three plans were evaluated and contrasted between them in terms of five metrics: target dose homogeneity, conformity index, organs at risk dose, dose fall off outside the target, and dose to normal tissues. A regularity index RI was introduced that quantified the degree of target shape irregularity. The effect of target size and shape irregularity on feasibility of 5.0 and 10.0 mm leaves was analyzed.Results: Consistent plan degradation was observed for 10.0 mm (sometimes for 5.0 mm) compared to 2.5 mm MLC in terms of the above five plan metrics, but this degradation was small to clinically insignificant. As an exception, when target (PTV) size was smaller than about 1 cm diameter, clinically significant differences were found between 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm MLC.Conclusion: 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC can be used in SRS/SRT for targets (PTV) diameter larger than 1 cm. For smaller targets, 2.5 mm MLC is clinically superior, 5.0 is acceptable and 10.0 mm MLC is discouraged in terms of PTV dose conformity.
topic SRS
SRT
radiosurgery
MLC
multileaf collimators
leaf width
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2019.00741/full
work_keys_str_mv AT wassimjalbout onthefeasibilityofstereotacticradiosurgerywith50and100mmmlcleavesasafunctionoftargetsizeandshape
AT janaabouzahr onthefeasibilityofstereotacticradiosurgerywith50and100mmmlcleavesasafunctionoftargetsizeandshape
AT bassemyoussef onthefeasibilityofstereotacticradiosurgerywith50and100mmmlcleavesasafunctionoftargetsizeandshape
AT bilalshahine onthefeasibilityofstereotacticradiosurgerywith50and100mmmlcleavesasafunctionoftargetsizeandshape
_version_ 1725322807317889024