An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer

Abstract Background Surveilling recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) requires frequent cystoscopy, which is invasive, expensive and time-consuming. An accurate urinary biomarker has the potential to reduce the number of cystoscopies required during post-treatment surveillance. Objective To audit the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madhusudan Koya, Sue Osborne, Christophe Chemaslé, Sima Porten, Anne Schuckman, Andrew Kennedy-Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-02-01
Series:BMC Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-0583-0
id doaj-f7403adb92904ef7bfce4e93f392c295
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f7403adb92904ef7bfce4e93f392c2952021-02-14T12:25:47ZengBMCBMC Urology1471-24902020-02-012011910.1186/s12894-020-0583-0An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancerMadhusudan Koya0Sue Osborne1Christophe Chemaslé2Sima Porten3Anne Schuckman4Andrew Kennedy-Smith5Waitemata District Health BoardWaitemata District Health BoardMid Central District Health BoardUniversity of California San FranciscoUSC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern CaliforniaCapital & Coast District Health BoardAbstract Background Surveilling recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) requires frequent cystoscopy, which is invasive, expensive and time-consuming. An accurate urinary biomarker has the potential to reduce the number of cystoscopies required during post-treatment surveillance. Objective To audit the clinical utility of a new surveillance protocol incorporating the Cxbladder Monitor (CxbM) test in real-world practice. Methods Three hospitals implemented a new surveillance protocol. Patients were risk stratified, and then provided urine samples for CxbM testing. Low-risk CxbM-positive patients and all high-risk patients had cystoscopy at 2–3 months. Low-risk CxbM-negative patients had cystoscopy at ~ 12 months. Results 443 CxbM tests were conducted on samples from 309 patients: 257 (83.2%) low-risk and 52 (16.8%) high-risk. No pathology-confirmed recurrences were seen in low-risk CxbM-negative patients (n = 108) during the first post-CxbM cystoscopy undertaken a mean ± SD 10.3 ± 3.9 months after testing. Three recurrences were detected during cystoscopy at 2.7 ± 3.4 months in 53 low-risk CxbM-positive patients. In 49 high-risk patients, 39 (79.6%) were CxbM-negative with no pathology-confirmed recurrences. Ten high-risk patients (20.4%) were CxbM-positive with four confirmed recurrences; 2 high-grade and 2 low-grade. The median time to first cystoscopy was 12.13 (95% CI: 11.97–12.4) months in patients with a CxbM-negative result versus 1.63 (95% CI: 1.13–2.3) months in patients with a CxbM-positive result (p < 0.00001). No positive cases were missed, no patients progressed to invasive or metastatic disease, and no patient died of cancer over 35 months of follow-up. Conclusions CxbM accurately identified a high proportion of patients (77.8%) who were safely managed with only one cystoscopy per year. Including CxbM in the protocol for patient surveillance provided clinical utility by reducing the average number of annual cystoscopies by approximately 39%, thereby sparing patients the potential discomfort and anxiety, without compromising detection rates. No advantage was observed for risk stratification prior to CxbM.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-0583-0Bladder cancerCystoscopyRecurrenceGenomic rule-out test
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Madhusudan Koya
Sue Osborne
Christophe Chemaslé
Sima Porten
Anne Schuckman
Andrew Kennedy-Smith
spellingShingle Madhusudan Koya
Sue Osborne
Christophe Chemaslé
Sima Porten
Anne Schuckman
Andrew Kennedy-Smith
An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer
BMC Urology
Bladder cancer
Cystoscopy
Recurrence
Genomic rule-out test
author_facet Madhusudan Koya
Sue Osborne
Christophe Chemaslé
Sima Porten
Anne Schuckman
Andrew Kennedy-Smith
author_sort Madhusudan Koya
title An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer
title_short An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer
title_full An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer
title_fullStr An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer
title_sort evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the cxbladder monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer
publisher BMC
series BMC Urology
issn 1471-2490
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Abstract Background Surveilling recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) requires frequent cystoscopy, which is invasive, expensive and time-consuming. An accurate urinary biomarker has the potential to reduce the number of cystoscopies required during post-treatment surveillance. Objective To audit the clinical utility of a new surveillance protocol incorporating the Cxbladder Monitor (CxbM) test in real-world practice. Methods Three hospitals implemented a new surveillance protocol. Patients were risk stratified, and then provided urine samples for CxbM testing. Low-risk CxbM-positive patients and all high-risk patients had cystoscopy at 2–3 months. Low-risk CxbM-negative patients had cystoscopy at ~ 12 months. Results 443 CxbM tests were conducted on samples from 309 patients: 257 (83.2%) low-risk and 52 (16.8%) high-risk. No pathology-confirmed recurrences were seen in low-risk CxbM-negative patients (n = 108) during the first post-CxbM cystoscopy undertaken a mean ± SD 10.3 ± 3.9 months after testing. Three recurrences were detected during cystoscopy at 2.7 ± 3.4 months in 53 low-risk CxbM-positive patients. In 49 high-risk patients, 39 (79.6%) were CxbM-negative with no pathology-confirmed recurrences. Ten high-risk patients (20.4%) were CxbM-positive with four confirmed recurrences; 2 high-grade and 2 low-grade. The median time to first cystoscopy was 12.13 (95% CI: 11.97–12.4) months in patients with a CxbM-negative result versus 1.63 (95% CI: 1.13–2.3) months in patients with a CxbM-positive result (p < 0.00001). No positive cases were missed, no patients progressed to invasive or metastatic disease, and no patient died of cancer over 35 months of follow-up. Conclusions CxbM accurately identified a high proportion of patients (77.8%) who were safely managed with only one cystoscopy per year. Including CxbM in the protocol for patient surveillance provided clinical utility by reducing the average number of annual cystoscopies by approximately 39%, thereby sparing patients the potential discomfort and anxiety, without compromising detection rates. No advantage was observed for risk stratification prior to CxbM.
topic Bladder cancer
Cystoscopy
Recurrence
Genomic rule-out test
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-0583-0
work_keys_str_mv AT madhusudankoya anevaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer
AT sueosborne anevaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer
AT christophechemasle anevaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer
AT simaporten anevaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer
AT anneschuckman anevaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer
AT andrewkennedysmith anevaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer
AT madhusudankoya evaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer
AT sueosborne evaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer
AT christophechemasle evaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer
AT simaporten evaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer
AT anneschuckman evaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer
AT andrewkennedysmith evaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer
_version_ 1724270587674624000