An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer
Abstract Background Surveilling recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) requires frequent cystoscopy, which is invasive, expensive and time-consuming. An accurate urinary biomarker has the potential to reduce the number of cystoscopies required during post-treatment surveillance. Objective To audit the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Urology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-0583-0 |
id |
doaj-f7403adb92904ef7bfce4e93f392c295 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f7403adb92904ef7bfce4e93f392c2952021-02-14T12:25:47ZengBMCBMC Urology1471-24902020-02-012011910.1186/s12894-020-0583-0An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancerMadhusudan Koya0Sue Osborne1Christophe Chemaslé2Sima Porten3Anne Schuckman4Andrew Kennedy-Smith5Waitemata District Health BoardWaitemata District Health BoardMid Central District Health BoardUniversity of California San FranciscoUSC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern CaliforniaCapital & Coast District Health BoardAbstract Background Surveilling recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) requires frequent cystoscopy, which is invasive, expensive and time-consuming. An accurate urinary biomarker has the potential to reduce the number of cystoscopies required during post-treatment surveillance. Objective To audit the clinical utility of a new surveillance protocol incorporating the Cxbladder Monitor (CxbM) test in real-world practice. Methods Three hospitals implemented a new surveillance protocol. Patients were risk stratified, and then provided urine samples for CxbM testing. Low-risk CxbM-positive patients and all high-risk patients had cystoscopy at 2–3 months. Low-risk CxbM-negative patients had cystoscopy at ~ 12 months. Results 443 CxbM tests were conducted on samples from 309 patients: 257 (83.2%) low-risk and 52 (16.8%) high-risk. No pathology-confirmed recurrences were seen in low-risk CxbM-negative patients (n = 108) during the first post-CxbM cystoscopy undertaken a mean ± SD 10.3 ± 3.9 months after testing. Three recurrences were detected during cystoscopy at 2.7 ± 3.4 months in 53 low-risk CxbM-positive patients. In 49 high-risk patients, 39 (79.6%) were CxbM-negative with no pathology-confirmed recurrences. Ten high-risk patients (20.4%) were CxbM-positive with four confirmed recurrences; 2 high-grade and 2 low-grade. The median time to first cystoscopy was 12.13 (95% CI: 11.97–12.4) months in patients with a CxbM-negative result versus 1.63 (95% CI: 1.13–2.3) months in patients with a CxbM-positive result (p < 0.00001). No positive cases were missed, no patients progressed to invasive or metastatic disease, and no patient died of cancer over 35 months of follow-up. Conclusions CxbM accurately identified a high proportion of patients (77.8%) who were safely managed with only one cystoscopy per year. Including CxbM in the protocol for patient surveillance provided clinical utility by reducing the average number of annual cystoscopies by approximately 39%, thereby sparing patients the potential discomfort and anxiety, without compromising detection rates. No advantage was observed for risk stratification prior to CxbM.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-0583-0Bladder cancerCystoscopyRecurrenceGenomic rule-out test |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Madhusudan Koya Sue Osborne Christophe Chemaslé Sima Porten Anne Schuckman Andrew Kennedy-Smith |
spellingShingle |
Madhusudan Koya Sue Osborne Christophe Chemaslé Sima Porten Anne Schuckman Andrew Kennedy-Smith An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer BMC Urology Bladder cancer Cystoscopy Recurrence Genomic rule-out test |
author_facet |
Madhusudan Koya Sue Osborne Christophe Chemaslé Sima Porten Anne Schuckman Andrew Kennedy-Smith |
author_sort |
Madhusudan Koya |
title |
An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer |
title_short |
An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer |
title_full |
An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer |
title_fullStr |
An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
An evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the Cxbladder Monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer |
title_sort |
evaluation of the real world use and clinical utility of the cxbladder monitor assay in the follow-up of patients previously treated for bladder cancer |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Urology |
issn |
1471-2490 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Surveilling recurrent urothelial carcinoma (UC) requires frequent cystoscopy, which is invasive, expensive and time-consuming. An accurate urinary biomarker has the potential to reduce the number of cystoscopies required during post-treatment surveillance. Objective To audit the clinical utility of a new surveillance protocol incorporating the Cxbladder Monitor (CxbM) test in real-world practice. Methods Three hospitals implemented a new surveillance protocol. Patients were risk stratified, and then provided urine samples for CxbM testing. Low-risk CxbM-positive patients and all high-risk patients had cystoscopy at 2–3 months. Low-risk CxbM-negative patients had cystoscopy at ~ 12 months. Results 443 CxbM tests were conducted on samples from 309 patients: 257 (83.2%) low-risk and 52 (16.8%) high-risk. No pathology-confirmed recurrences were seen in low-risk CxbM-negative patients (n = 108) during the first post-CxbM cystoscopy undertaken a mean ± SD 10.3 ± 3.9 months after testing. Three recurrences were detected during cystoscopy at 2.7 ± 3.4 months in 53 low-risk CxbM-positive patients. In 49 high-risk patients, 39 (79.6%) were CxbM-negative with no pathology-confirmed recurrences. Ten high-risk patients (20.4%) were CxbM-positive with four confirmed recurrences; 2 high-grade and 2 low-grade. The median time to first cystoscopy was 12.13 (95% CI: 11.97–12.4) months in patients with a CxbM-negative result versus 1.63 (95% CI: 1.13–2.3) months in patients with a CxbM-positive result (p < 0.00001). No positive cases were missed, no patients progressed to invasive or metastatic disease, and no patient died of cancer over 35 months of follow-up. Conclusions CxbM accurately identified a high proportion of patients (77.8%) who were safely managed with only one cystoscopy per year. Including CxbM in the protocol for patient surveillance provided clinical utility by reducing the average number of annual cystoscopies by approximately 39%, thereby sparing patients the potential discomfort and anxiety, without compromising detection rates. No advantage was observed for risk stratification prior to CxbM. |
topic |
Bladder cancer Cystoscopy Recurrence Genomic rule-out test |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-0583-0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT madhusudankoya anevaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer AT sueosborne anevaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer AT christophechemasle anevaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer AT simaporten anevaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer AT anneschuckman anevaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer AT andrewkennedysmith anevaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer AT madhusudankoya evaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer AT sueosborne evaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer AT christophechemasle evaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer AT simaporten evaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer AT anneschuckman evaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer AT andrewkennedysmith evaluationoftherealworlduseandclinicalutilityofthecxbladdermonitorassayinthefollowupofpatientspreviouslytreatedforbladdercancer |
_version_ |
1724270587674624000 |